
Revolut has scrapped its plan to buy a U.S. bank, deciding instead to apply for a brand new federal banking license directly from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It's a notable gamble that the regulatory winds have shifted enough under the Trump administration to make the slower, riskier path actually the faster one.
The pivot comes after Revolut apparently concluded that acquiring an existing American bank would take longer and create more headaches than originally expected. Sources familiar with the matter say the acquisition route would have forced the digital-only company into owning physical branches, which is basically the opposite of everything Revolut stands for. Not exactly ideal when your whole pitch is "banking on your phone, no branches needed."
Here's where it gets interesting. Revolut is clearly betting that the new administration's much friendlier stance toward fintech and crypto companies means they can actually get a de novo charter approved in a reasonable timeframe. That would have been borderline laughable just two years ago.
The OCC under Biden basically shut the door on crypto firms and fintechs looking for national bank charters. But things changed fast after Trump took office. By late 2025, the agency started conditionally approving charters for companies like Circle and Ripple, which would have been unthinkable under the previous regime. The regulatory floodgates didn't just open, they got ripped off the hinges.
So Revolut's calculation seems to be: why spend months or years trying to negotiate an acquisition, deal with integration nightmares, and inherit a bunch of branches we don't want, when we might be able to get a fresh charter approved faster than ever before?
For those not deep in banking arcana, a de novo license means starting from scratch. You're building a new bank rather than buying an existing one. It's traditionally been the longer, harder path because regulators scrutinize new applications intensely.
But for a company like Revolut, it has some real advantages. They get to build exactly what they want without dealing with legacy systems, outdated tech stacks, or that branch in Des Moines that somehow still uses fax machines. Everything can be designed for mobile-first customers who expect instant everything.
The company already has experience running banks in other markets. They've held a European banking license since 2018 and got a restricted UK banking license in 2024. So it's not like they're starting completely fresh, they know how this game works.
Revolut isn't exactly limping into this application process. The company hit a $75 billion valuation in a secondary share sale back in November 2025, making it one of the most valuable private tech companies in Europe. That funding round pulled in heavy hitters like Coatue, Greenoaks, and even Nvidia's venture arm.
The financials back up the hype too. Revolut reported $4 billion in revenue for 2024, up 72% year over year. Pre-tax profit jumped 149% to $1.4 billion. They've got over 65 million users across 39 countries. These aren't struggling startup numbers, this is a company that's figured out how to grow profitably at scale.
Right now, Revolut operates in the U.S. through a partnership with Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which limits what they can offer. A full federal banking license would unlock deposit accounts, loans, overdraft protection, basically the full menu of services that would let them actually compete as a primary bank rather than a secondary account people use for travel.
The American market is the big prize that Revolut hasn't quite cracked yet. It's the world's largest financial market and arguably the toughest nut to crack for foreign fintechs. But the potential upside is massive.
U.S. consumers have shown they're willing to ditch traditional banks for digital alternatives. Chime has millions of customers. SoFi went public. There's clearly appetite for what Revolut does, they just need the regulatory approvals to do it properly.
The company calls itself "the world's first global financial superapp," which is the kind of ambitious branding you'd expect from a $75 billion fintech. But you can't really claim to be global if you're hamstrung in the U.S. market.
The U.S. license application fits into Revolut's broader expansion blitz. They applied for a banking license in Peru in January 2026, their fifth market in Latin America after Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil. They've also moved into India, got regulatory approval in the UAE, and announced a $1.1 billion investment in France over three years.
Latin America in particular seems ripe for disruption. In Peru, the top four banks control over 82% of total loans. That kind of concentration creates opportunities for newcomers, especially ones focused on remittances and cross-border payments where traditional banks tend to charge hefty fees.
Revolut's crypto capabilities might actually help its case, which would have sounded absurd a few years ago. The company runs a crypto exchange called Revolut X and has a MiCA license from Cyprus to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area.
Under Trump, the OCC has made clear that crypto activities are fair game for national banks, assuming they have proper risk controls. The agency issued multiple interpretive letters throughout 2025 clarifying that banks can do crypto custody, stablecoin activities, and participate in blockchain networks.
The GENIUS Act passed in July 2025 created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing and putting federal banking regulators in charge of oversight. That kind of regulatory clarity is exactly what banks need to feel comfortable offering crypto services without worrying they'll get slapped down later.
So Revolut's crypto experience could actually be a selling point rather than a liability, depending on who's reviewing the application.
Revolut has some baggage to deal with. The company's customer service has been criticized pretty heavily, with some customers reporting major difficulties resolving fraud claims or getting help with account issues.
In 2023, Action Fraud in the UK received 10,000 reports of fraud naming Revolut, which was more than Barclays, one of Britain's biggest banks. Consumer organization Which? has warned people not to keep large amounts of money with Revolut, citing concerns about fraud reimbursement.
Those aren't the kind of headlines that make regulators eager to approve your banking license application. The OCC is going to want to see evidence that Revolut has seriously upgraded its consumer protection and customer support operations. A few bad reviews are one thing, but systematic problems with fraud response could sink the whole application.
Revolut confirmed it's exploring multiple paths for U.S. expansion but the de novo license is currently the priority. They haven't said when they'll formally submit the application or how long they expect the process to take.
The OCC typically aims to make decisions within 120 days of accepting an application, though that timeline can stretch depending on complexity. Given Revolut's size, international operations, and the breadth of services they want to offer, this probably won't be a quick rubber stamp approval.
Still, the recent approvals for crypto-focused companies suggest the regulatory environment is about as friendly as it's been in years. If there was ever a time to roll the dice on a de novo application, this is probably it.
Revolut's strategic flip illustrates how quickly regulatory changes can reshape business strategy. Two years ago, every fintech was looking at acquisitions as the realistic path into U.S. banking. Now the calculus has completely reversed for some companies.
The Trump administration's lighter touch on fintech and crypto regulation has opened a window that might not stay open forever. Companies are rushing to get applications in while the getting's good. Whether this regulatory approach proves sustainable long-term is anyone's guess, but for now it's created opportunities that simply didn't exist under the previous administration.
For Revolut specifically, cracking the U.S. market is kind of the final boss level in their quest to become a truly global financial platform. They've got strong financials, solid user growth, and a regulatory environment that's actually receptive to innovation for once.
The next few months will show whether their bet on going the de novo route pays off, or if U.S. banking regulation proves too complex even for a $75 billion company to navigate smoothly. Either way, it's going to be an interesting case study in how fintechs approach regulatory strategy in an era of rapid political change.
One thing's for sure though: if Revolut pulls this off, expect every other major fintech to start reconsidering their U.S. market strategies too.

When Michael Selig stepped into the role of CFTC chair late last year, the crypto industry was already expecting a change in tone. This week, it got confirmation.
On January 20, Selig announced the launch of the CFTC’s new “Future-Proof” initiative, a program designed to rethink how U.S. markets regulate crypto, digital assets, and other fast-moving financial technologies. The message was clear. The old approach is no longer enough.
Rather than relying on enforcement actions and retroactive interpretations of decades-old rules, the CFTC wants to build regulatory frameworks that actually reflect how these markets function today.
For an industry that has spent years navigating uncertainty, that alone is a notable shift.
Selig is not new to crypto regulation. Before taking the top job at the CFTC, he worked closely with digital asset policy at the SEC and spent time in private practice advising both traditional financial firms and crypto companies. He also previously clerked at the CFTC, giving him an unusually well-rounded view of how regulators and markets interact.
That background shows up in his public comments. Since taking office, Selig has repeatedly emphasized predictability, clarity, and rules that market participants can actually follow without guessing how an agency might interpret them years later.
The Future-Proof initiative is the clearest expression of that philosophy so far.
At its core, Future-Proof is about moving away from improvisation. The CFTC wants to stop forcing novel digital products into regulatory boxes built for traditional derivatives and commodities.
Instead, the agency plans to pursue purpose-built rules through formal notice-and-comment processes. That means more upfront guidance and fewer surprises delivered through enforcement actions.
Selig has described the goal as applying the minimum effective level of regulation. Enough oversight to protect markets and participants, but not so much that innovation is choked off before it has a chance to mature.
For crypto firms, that approach could offer something they have long asked for but rarely received, which is regulatory certainty.
The timing matters. Crypto markets are more institutional than they were even a few years ago. Large asset managers, trading firms, and infrastructure providers want clearer rules before committing serious capital. Uncertainty around jurisdiction and compliance has been one of the biggest obstacles.
If the CFTC follows through, Future-Proof could help define how derivatives, spot markets, and emerging products like prediction markets are treated under U.S. law. That would make it easier for firms to build, invest, and operate without constantly second-guessing regulators.
At the same time, clarity cuts both ways. More defined rules could also raise the bar for compliance, especially for smaller startups and decentralized platforms that have operated in legal gray zones.
Tennessee Attempts to Block Prediction Markets
Selig’s initiative does not exist in isolation. It comes as lawmakers in Washington continue debating how to split crypto oversight between the CFTC and the SEC. Several proposed bills aim to draw clearer lines around digital commodities and spot market regulation, potentially expanding the CFTC’s role.
Future-Proof appears designed to fit neatly into that broader push. If Congress hands the agency more authority, the CFTC wants to be ready with frameworks that can scale.
Still, challenges remain. The commission currently lacks a full slate of confirmed commissioners, raising questions about how durable these policy shifts will be. Coordination with the SEC is another open issue, especially where token classifications blur the line between securities and commodities.
For now, Future-Proof is more direction than destination. The real test will be how quickly the CFTC turns principles into actual rules, and whether those rules survive political change and legal scrutiny.
But the tone alone represents a meaningful break from the past. After years of regulation by enforcement and ambiguity, the agency is signaling that crypto markets are not a temporary problem to be contained, but a permanent part of the financial system that deserves thoughtful governance.
Whether that vision becomes reality will shape the next phase of U.S. crypto regulation, and potentially determine whether innovation stays onshore or continues looking elsewhere.


Caroline Pham is heading into her final stretch as acting chair of the CFTC, but she is not easing her way out. Instead, she has pulled together a new CEO Innovation Council, bringing in a mix of crypto founders and leaders from major financial institutions. The timing feels intentional. Markets are shifting fast, the technology is shifting even faster, and she clearly wanted this group in place before she hands off the job.
The council itself is an unusual gathering. On one side are Tyler Winklevoss from Gemini, Arjun Sethi from Kraken and Shayne Coplan from Polymarket. On the other, executives from CME Group, Nasdaq, ICE and Cboe. It is not often you see these people sitting on the same advisory panel, let alone one created this quickly. According to the commission, the entire list came together in about two weeks, which says a lot about how much urgency Pham applied.
She thanked the group for agreeing to join so quickly, noting that the commission needs their experience as it tries to prepare for what comes next. The council will focus on the areas where the rulebook is changing as fast as the products themselves. Tokenization. Prediction markets. Perpetual contracts. Crypto collateral. Around the clock trading. Blockchain market plumbing. Basically all the things that traditional derivatives systems were never built to handle.
Here is the full list of names:
Shayne Coplan, Polymarket
Craig Donohue, Cboe
Terry Duffy, CME Group
Tom Farley, Bullish
Adena Friedman, Nasdaq
Luke Hoersten, Bitnomial
Tarek Mansour, Kalshi
Kris Marszalek, Crypto.com
David Schwimmer, LSEG
Arjun Sethi, Kraken
Jeff Sprecher, Intercontinental Exchange
Tyler Winklevoss, Gemini
All of this is happening as the agency prepares for new leadership. President Trump’s nominee, Mike Selig, is expected to be confirmed soon. When he steps in, he will inherit an agency already deep into crypto policy work that accelerated under Pham. Just this week, the CFTC launched a pilot for using crypto collateral inside derivatives markets. A few days before that, Bitnomial began offering leverage spot crypto trading with her support.
Pham has only been in the acting role for a short time, but she treated crypto as a top priority, pushing several initiatives that line up with the administration’s goal of positioning the United States as a leading hub for digital assets. Over at the SEC, Chairman Paul Atkins has been doing something similar through Project Crypto, which has been absorbing much of the agency’s energy.
What comes next will land in Selig’s lap. But with this council now in place, he will walk into a job where the industry and the regulators are already in the middle of a much bigger conversation about what the future of market structure should look like.

Polymarket, one of the most well-known crypto prediction platforms, has officially secured approval from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to operate as a fully regulated exchange in the United States. This milestone represents the end of a long regulatory saga and marks the beginning of a new era for event-based markets in the American financial system.
Once viewed primarily as an offshore curiosity on the fringes of crypto, Polymarket is now entering the most regulated derivatives market in the world with a structure that resembles a traditional exchange. The approval signals a wider shift in how prediction markets are treated, not as gray-area gambling products but as legitimate financial instruments with real informational and economic value.
Polymarket’s path to reentry took several years and involved significant regulatory challenges.
In 2022 the CFTC fined the company and required it to shut down operations for U.S. customers. At the time the agency viewed Polymarket as an unregistered derivatives venue, and American users were cut off as the platform relocated offshore. For nearly three years Polymarket operated internationally, mostly in regulatory limbo, even as it grew rapidly.
Everything shifted in 2025. Polymarket acquired QCEX, a CFTC-licensed exchange and clearing entity, which gave the company a compliant foundation to reenter the United States. This acquisition changed the regulatory landscape. With QCEX under its umbrella, Polymarket could finally connect to the U.S. derivatives system in a way that aligned with federal rules.
The CFTC then issued a targeted no-action letter providing relief for certain recordkeeping and reporting requirements related specifically to event contracts. This signaled that regulators were open to a structured, compliant form of prediction markets.
The latest approval goes further. It integrates Polymarket’s U.S. entity into the full Designated Contract Market framework, meaning it can now operate in tandem with brokers, clearing firms and professional market infrastructure.
Polymarket has not simply returned. It has transformed.
With this newly amended approval, Polymarket’s U.S. exchange gains access to traditional financial infrastructure, including:
Brokers, futures commission merchants and financial intermediaries can now connect to the exchange. Retail participants will eventually be able to access markets through their existing brokerage accounts.
Contracts can settle through a compliant clearinghouse with full risk controls, reporting frameworks and established audit systems. This allows Polymarket to operate with the same safeguards that apply to regulated futures markets.
The exchange now sits inside the CFTC’s regulatory perimeter. Instead of operating in a legal gray zone, Polymarket’s U.S. operations function as a recognized derivatives venue.
This level of integration was once unimaginable for prediction markets. Now it represents the new baseline.
Polymarket’s core innovation is event-based trading. Users buy or sell positions tied to real-world outcomes such as elections, policy decisions, sports results, economic data releases or cultural events.
The company plans a phased rollout for the U.S. market that will begin with a limited number of markets while onboarding infrastructure is tested. Over time the platform intends to expand into broader categories, including political outcomes, macroeconomic indicators and entertainment markets.
The company has raised substantial capital at valuations nearing one billion dollars, and investors expect the regulated U.S. platform to be a major growth driver.
Polymarket’s approval arrives at a time when interest in event contracts is growing across the financial, regulatory and technology sectors. Several major industry trends make this moment especially significant:
For decades regulators struggled to categorize prediction markets. The new CFTC framework acknowledges that event-based products can carry informational and hedging value rather than being dismissed as speculative wagers.
Traditional finance platforms, sports betting operators and fintech companies are exploring event-based products. This includes sports markets, political prediction markets and financial data markets.
With intermediated access permitted, it is possible that Polymarket’s markets will eventually appear on traditional brokerage platforms, in the same accounts where users already trade stocks and futures.
The regulatory structure around event contracts is still evolving, but Polymarket’s approval provides a template for others to follow. Until recently, no one could point to a clear path. Now there is one.
This is not just a step forward for Polymarket. It is a turning point for the entire prediction market industry.
While the approval is a major milestone, several challenges remain:
State-level restrictions may still apply. Some states treat event markets as gambling, regardless of federal classification.
Political concerns are rising as political event markets attract both attention and controversy.
Scope of no-action relief remains limited, meaning regulators could still intervene if markets move outside approved parameters.
Global regulatory landscape remains inconsistent, with foreign jurisdictions applying very different gambling and derivatives rules.
Polymarket’s success in the United States does not automatically eliminate international hurdles.
Polymarket’s return to the United States in fully regulated form marks one of the most important shifts in the history of prediction markets. A platform once forced offshore has now reentered the U.S. through a regulated, institutional-grade exchange framework. The significance of this moment goes far beyond one company. It signals that prediction markets may finally be entering the financial mainstream.
The next phase will determine how widely these markets spread, how they integrate with traditional finance and how regulators balance innovation with oversight. But for now, a once-fringe industry has gained legitimacy, and Polymarket stands at the center of the transformation.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

A new bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives known as the “Bitcoin for America Act” could usher in a historic shift in how Americans interact with cryptocurrency. Under the legislation, individuals and businesses would be allowed to pay federal taxes in Bitcoin, and the payments would be directed into a proposed U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. If enacted, the policy has the potential to create unprecedented demand for Bitcoin while bolstering America’s position in the digital asset economy.
The bill, introduced by Congressman Warren Davidson of Ohio, sets out to allow taxpayers to settle their federal tax liabilities in Bitcoin (BTC) without triggering capital gains tax on the transaction. In practice this means that someone could pay their IRS tax bill using Bitcoin directly, rather than converting to fiat first and then paying the IRS. Importantly the proceeds from these payments would go toward building a U.S. government held stockpile of Bitcoin, dubbed the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
This approach marks a major policy shift for several reasons:
For the first time the government would accept crypto assets directly for tax payments.
The removal of capital gains liability would make such payments more appealing.
The creation of a national Bitcoin reserve elevates Bitcoin from an investment asset into a component of state financial policy.
The bill frames crypto adoption as not only financial innovation but also national economic strategy.
Supporters argue that the policy would reduce pressure on the dollar, expand alternative stores of value for U.S. capital, and accelerate the growth of digital infrastructure.
One of the more ambitious claims of the legislation is that it could contribute up to a $14-trillion boost to the U.S. economy over time. The rationale behind this figure includes:
The compounding effect of a government-held Bitcoin reserve appreciating alongside institutional demand.
Lower costs of capital and inflation hedge benefits that arise from allocating national value into crypto assets.
Spillover investment into digital entitlements, blockchain infrastructure, decentralized finance and tokenized real-world assets.
A “flywheel effect” where acceptance of Bitcoin for taxes catalyzes corporate and institutional adoption, thereby increasing velocity, liquidity and real economic activity.
While such a number is speculative and depends on many variables, the underlying mechanism is clear: by institutionalizing Bitcoin and giving it official status in economic and fiscal policy, the effect could ripple across investment, technology, and global economic positioning.
Crucially this bill is aligned with broader shifts in U.S. policy and regulatory thinking:
The IRS continues to treat digital assets as property and is doubling down on reporting requirements for crypto transactions. While paying taxes in Bitcoin would require major administrative changes, the notion of digital assets interacting with official tax systems is gaining traction.
Other legislation such as the BITCOIN Act and proposals to establish a national Bitcoin reserve signal rising bipartisan interest in crypto as a strategic asset rather than just a market speculation.
The fact that this tax payment in Bitcoin proposal is being advanced by a sitting Congressman signals that crypto adoption is no longer a fringe topic but is moving toward policy mainstream.
From an institutional standpoint the step from private market crypto investment to tax payments and national reserves is profound. It creates a pathway for cryptocurrencies to be embedded in sovereign financial strategy rather than simply private portfolios.
While the bill’s overview is bold the implementation would require substantive changes:
Taxpayers would submit tax liabilities in Bitcoin rather than U.S. dollars.
The IRS or Treasury would need to accept BTC, probably by converting it to USD or holding it as an asset.
The bill proposes to treat the crypto payment without capital gains tax exposure for the taxpayer, which is a major incentive.
Collected Bitcoin would be placed into the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, converting tax payments into a national digital asset stockpile.
Systems and regulatory frameworks would be needed to track and value received crypto, handle refunds, and integrate with existing tax infrastructure.
While the logistics are significant, proponents argue that digital asset infrastructure is already technologically capable of handling such a flow if policy and regulation align.
There are meaningful hurdles and risks that must be considered:
Volatility risk: Bitcoin is a volatile asset. Accepting tax payments in BTC exposes the treasury or reserve to price swings.
Administrative complexity: Standardizing crypto tax payments across millions of filings requires new systems and raises questions about custody, valuation, tax basis and audit ability.
Regulatory clarity: While the bill is ambitious it must pass committee, survive amendments, and contend with the fact that many regulators still treat crypto as property and not currency.
Public perception and fairness: Some may question whether allowing Bitcoin payments favors crypto-savvy taxpayers or shifts risks to general taxpayers.
Economic numbers may be aspirational: While the $14-trillion potential is headline grabbing the actual outcome depends on broad adoption, global demand, and macroeconomic environment.
If this bill passes it would shift several long-standing barriers:
Crypto becomes not only an investment asset but a valid means of tax payment, enhancing its legitimacy.
Governments participating in crypto expand the ecosystem beyond pockets of enthusiast use into full sovereign inclusion.
Institutional and corporate adoption could accelerate dramatically when foundational use cases like tax payments are enabled.
The narrative of crypto as volatile and speculative would be countered by its new function in everyday fiscal operations.
In short this is not just a policy tweak; it is a redefinition of how digital assets can interface with government, finance, and economies at large.
The Bitcoin for America Act is a bold proposal that could reshape how cryptocurrency interacts with tax systems, government reserves, and the global economy. If implemented it could be a defining moment for the sector.
For investors and observers this is a pivotal moment: the path from niche technology to sovereign asset becomes clearer. While the ambitions are large and the risks real the upside, both for Bitcoin and the broader digital asset industry, is massive.
This is a moment to watch closely. Public policy is aligning with crypto innovation and the tip of the spear could very well be tax payments in Bitcoin and a national digital reserve. If that happens the narrative around crypto will change forever.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Cardano is no longer in the “ETF someday” category. At Cardano Summit 2025 in Berlin, Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard publicly stated that the organization is actively working on a United States based ADA exchange traded fund. He described the initiative as a strategic priority aimed at expanding regulated access to Cardano’s multibillion dollar ecosystem and accelerating institutional participation.
This shift marks one of the clearest signals yet that a Cardano ETF is moving from speculation into an organized, deliberate effort.
At the summit, Gregaard explained that the Foundation is pursuing a United States listed ETF that would give investors direct regulated exposure to ADA. He emphasized that the initiative aligns with the Foundation’s long term strategy of expanding adoption, strengthening Cardano’s financial infrastructure, and positioning ADA as a legitimate allocation within traditional markets.
Additional background from the Foundation in recent months shows:
The Cardano Foundation has scaled substantially, growing from roughly 30 staff to more than 100 in the past few years, and maturing its operational structure and compliance efforts.
The organization has been coordinating with exchanges, specialized ETF issuers, and service providers in preparation for eventual product listings.
Technical upgrades focused on scalability, security, and interoperability are being prioritized to meet the expectations of regulated financial products.
Gregaard described the ETF as something that supports multiple strategic objectives at once. It expands institutional access, introduces a familiar investment wrapper for traditional market participants, and reinforces Cardano’s positioning as a public blockchain infrastructure network rather than a purely speculative asset.
Although the Foundation’s involvement is new, Cardano’s ETF journey has already been building for over a year and the environment around it has shifted dramatically.
Earlier this year, a major United States asset manager filed for a spot Cardano ETF. The proposed product would hold ADA directly in cold storage, offering regulated exposure through brokerage accounts without requiring users to interact with exchanges or self custody wallets.
Regulators extended the review period for the ADA ETF filing and pushed the decision deadline further into 2025. These delays are normal in the ETF approval process. They do not imply rejection, but they confirm that the application remains active.
European markets have listed Cardano based exchange traded products for years. Some are pure ADA trackers and others are diversified digital asset baskets that include ADA. These products demonstrate that ADA has already been packaged successfully into regulated investment structures in major jurisdictions.
Several developments have made altcoin ETFs significantly more achievable:
Exchanges now have generic listing standards for commodity style crypto ETFs. This streamlines the process for non Bitcoin products.
Multiple spot ETFs for Solana, Litecoin, Hedera, and other altcoins have already launched successfully.
A digital large cap ETF that includes Cardano has been approved, confirming that ADA exposure already meets regulatory comfort levels in multi asset funds.
Many market analysts now place the probability of an ADA ETF approval in the high double digits. They cite Cardano’s long lifespan, consistent top ten market cap, and increasing classification as a “mature blockchain ecosystem.”
A spot Cardano ETF would allow investors to buy ADA exposure from conventional brokerage platforms, retirement accounts, and institutional mandates that require regulated instruments.
This would create several important effects:
Lower barriers for financial advisors and institutions that want crypto exposure but cannot interact with direct tokens.
Clearer regulatory boundaries, since ETF issuers must comply with formal custody, disclosure, and compliance frameworks.
New liquidity sources from large capital pools that are currently sidelined.
For Cardano, this would represent a major reputational milestone. It would place ADA alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum in the category of assets viewed by institutions as suitable for a broad investment audience.
The ETF effort complements the Foundation’s broader goal of defining Cardano as public infrastructure.
The network has emphasized scientific peer review, predictable upgrades, staking sustainability, and structured governance. Cardano also promotes real world adoption through enterprise pilot programs, digital identity initiatives, and global development partnerships. These traits align well with the risk frameworks used by institutional allocators.
An ETF would act as long term validation of Cardano’s technical and governance roadmap.
Based on existing filings and European products, there are several likely structures.
A simple product that holds ADA directly, with pricing tied to spot markets. This is the most likely first approval.
A multi asset fund where ADA represents a percentage of the portfolio. These are already live in Europe and are gaining traction in the United States.
A future category could attempt to reflect staking yield through derivatives or structural adjustments. This would require more regulatory clarity.
The Cardano Foundation would not issue the ETF itself, but it would provide technical support, network documentation, and ecosystem coordination while a professional asset manager handles regulatory filings.
Even with strong momentum, several factors can influence the final outcome:
Regulators can still deny or indefinitely delay a spot ADA ETF.
Political changes or shifts in regulatory priorities may slow down altcoin product approvals.
Market reactions are not guaranteed. ETF launches do not always lead to immediate price appreciation, especially during wider market downturns.
Investors must remember that ETF exposure carries ADA’s market volatility and ecosystem risks, even when held through a brokerage account.
The confirmation from Cardano Foundation CEO Frederik Gregaard that a United States ADA ETF is actively being developed is a major milestone for the ecosystem. Combined with existing ETF filings, the evolving regulatory landscape, and multiple successful altcoin ETF approvals, the pathway to a Cardano ETF is clearer than ever.
For the first time, an ADA ETF is not merely a wish from the community. It is an active strategic initiative with real institutional traction behind it. If approved, it will open the door to a wider class of investors, strengthen Cardano’s position in the regulated financial world, and reinforce its role as a durable blockchain infrastructure platform.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Canary Capital is poised to launch what could become the first major U.S. spot ETF tied to XRP on November 13, 2025. The firm updated its S-1 registration to remove a delaying amendment that previously gave the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indefinite discretion over timing. With that procedural hurdle cleared, the launch date now stands as scheduled, assuming final exchange filings are completed without new regulatory objections.
The updated S-1 submission eliminates the “delaying amendment” that prevented automatic effectiveness under Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Without that clause, the filing can become auto-effective after a 20-day waiting period unless the SEC raises substantial comments.
With this obstacle removed, the fund is tracking toward a November 13 launch, contingent on approval of its Form 8-A listing with the Nasdaq Stock Market and final clearance from the exchange.
The timing follows the same process used by other altcoin spot ETFs launched by Canary Capital, including products for Solana, Litecoin and Hedera. These also relied on the auto-effective mechanism.
A spot ETF for XRP dramatically expands investor access by enabling exposure through standard brokerage accounts. Investors will not need self-custody or direct interaction with crypto exchanges.
Institutional demand is expected to be significant. XRP has one of the largest global user bases in the digital asset sector. Many analysts believe the ETF could attract substantial inflows during its first months of trading.
The launch arrives during a broader shift in U.S. regulatory policy. Regulators have recently approved generic listing standards for spot crypto ETFs, creating a path for assets other than Bitcoin and Ethereum.
If the listing proceeds as planned, November 13 could become a landmark moment for altcoin investment products and a sign that regulated crypto ETFs are entering mainstream financial markets.
The ETF will trade on Nasdaq or another major U.S. exchange under a ticker that Canary Capital has not yet confirmed. Several filings suggest the ticker may be “XRPC.”
The fund is structured as a Delaware statutory trust and will hold direct spot XRP. No futures or synthetic exposure will be used.
Custodial providers and market makers are reportedly in place to support liquidity and orderly trading on the first day.
The removal of the delaying amendment gives the fund a direct legal path to launch. Unless the SEC issues new comments, the product will go live automatically on the expected date.
Although the date is targeted and procedurally aligned, the launch still depends on final exchange filings such as Form 8-A and the absence of additional SEC review. Any new staff comments could delay effectiveness.
The auto-effective pathway speeds up the process, but it does not guarantee that the SEC will not exercise its authority to halt or modify the filing.
As with all crypto-related ETFs, the product carries risks such as volatility, liquidity fluctuations, custody risk and potential tracking differences between the ETF and spot XRP.
High expectations may pose additional pressure. If initial trading performance does not meet market enthusiasm, sentiment could shift quickly.
Official confirmation of the ETF ticker and the listing exchange.
Announcements from authorized participants and liquidity providers, which will shape the ETF’s trading quality.
Secondary market trading volume and creation-unit activity once the fund opens.
XRP price action as markets react to the upcoming launch and investors position ahead of the date.
Additional regulatory updates that may impact this ETF or future altcoin ETFs.
Canary Capital’s spot XRP ETF represents one of the most significant steps yet toward expanding regulated crypto products beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. If the ETF goes live on November 13, 2025, it will open the door for broader institutional involvement in XRP and potentially set the stage for additional altcoin ETFs.
For XRP holders, the launch could bring new sources of liquidity, price discovery and market legitimacy. For the industry at large, it signals a shift toward regulated access points for digital assets. Success, however, will depend on smooth execution, clear communication from regulators and strong market participation once trading begins.
All indicators suggest that the launch is on track. Unless regulators introduce unexpected changes, November 13 could become a historic date for crypto investment products.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Coinbase has rolled out a new token-sale platform designed to provide retail investors with access to early-stage crypto projects under a regulated framework. The initiative aims to revive public token offerings in a safer, more transparent manner while restoring trust in token sales.
According to the company’s announcement the platform will host roughly one token sale per month. The first offering featured Monad, a high-performance blockchain startup.
Participants will use USD Coin (USDC) to purchase tokens. Token allocations are determined via an algorithm rather than a first-come, first-serve mechanism. Project teams and affiliated insiders will be prohibited from selling their tokens for six months after the public sale in order to reduce speculative flipping.
Unlike many of the chaotic ICOs of the past the platform will compile purchase requests during a one-week submission window. After that the algorithm will determine allocations with the goal of broad and equitable participation. Small investors will be given a fair chance rather than being crowded out by big players.
Payments must be made using USDC and participants must complete identity verification and compliance checks in good standing with Coinbase.
Project teams, founders and affiliated parties will be barred from selling any tokens—whether private or publicly traded—for at least six months following the public sale on Coinbase. This lock-up provision is intended to align incentives between founders and public investors and avoid immediate dump scenarios.
Issuers will be required to submit detailed disclosures covering tokenomics, vesting schedules and distribution mechanics. These documents will be publicly available providing prospective buyers clarity on what they’re purchasing and how the project is structured. The platform also plans to further develop features like limit orders, automatic reinvestment options and issuer-specific eligibility criteria.
During the 2017 ICO surge thousands of projects raised capital via token sales with minimal oversight. Many lacked product roadmaps, operated without regulatory compliance and ended in large losses or scams. This new Coinbase platform seeks to avoid that history by embedding regulatory controls and design features to reduce speculative excess.
The algorithmic allocations, lock-up periods and rigorous issuer criteria reflect this change.
Previously early-stage token participation was largely reserved for venture capital and accredited investors. Coinbase’s platform opens this market to retail investors under a regulated process tied to its existing infrastructure and compliance regime. In addition Coinbase has made strategic acquisitions including token issuance platform Liquifi and capital-formation platform Echo which strengthen its ability to manage token launches, compliance and cap-table operations.
For Coinbase the token-sale platform represents a growth avenue beyond trading fees. By hosting early-stage token launches and integrating token issuers earlier in their lifecycle the exchange can deepen user engagement, expand its product suite and capture new revenue models as the crypto capital-formation market evolves.
Increased participation and democratization: Retail users gain more equitable access to early token launches.
Improved token quality and credibility: Issuers undergo vetting and lock-ups promoting longer-term alignment.
Competitive pressure on other exchanges: Coinbase may set a new standard for token launches under regulatory guardrails.
Boost to on-chain fundraising: The platform could catalyze a revival of public token offerings with better structure and oversight.
Enhanced secondary market liquidity: With tokens launching via Coinbase’s funnel, listings and liquidity may improve for projects post-sale.
Volume vs quality trade-off: If offerings are too restrictive it may limit deal flow or cause frustration among issuers seeking speed and capital.
Regulatory land-mines: Token sales remain subject to securities laws classification and regulatory enforcement. Any misstep on issuer vetting or investor protections could prompt scrutiny.
Scalability of governance and infrastructure: As the platform hosts more sales maintaining the rigor of disclosures, lock-up enforcement and user fairness will be operationally demanding.
Market sentiment and speculation: Even with guardrails speculative behavior could still dominate new token launches, possibly recreating volatile market dynamics.
Issuer reputation risk: Early failures or token launches that under-perform could damage the platform’s credibility and the broader token-sale model.
The performance and user-feedback of the first offering from Monad and how secondary trading unfolds.
Timeline for subsequent sales and how frequently the platform opens slots.
Additional features announced such as limit orders, reinvestment tools and issuer custom-allocations.
Regulatory responses—whether U.S. agencies view the platform model as compliant or require additional oversight.
Impact on the broader token-launch ecosystem—whether rivals adopt similar models or the industry shifts toward more regulated public sales.
Coinbase’s token-sale platform represents a meaningful step toward the institutionalization of crypto capital-formation. By introducing algorithmic allocations, issuer lock-ups and strong disclosure standards the exchange is attempting to reboot public token launches in a way that avoids the chaos of the ICO boom.
For retail investors it offers a structured opportunity to access early-stage crypto projects. For issuers it provides regulated access to a large investor base under Coinbase’s brand and infrastructure.
Ultimately the success of this initiative will depend on execution, project quality and market reception. If Coinbase can maintain disciplined rollout while delivering compelling token offerings this could set a new paradigm for how tokens are issued, sold and listed in the next phase of crypto.
The next few token sale cycles will tell whether this is merely a novelty or a foundational shift in how crypto projects raise capital and engage with the public.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is reportedly preparing to allow leveraged spot crypto asset products to launch as early as next month. These products would enable retail and institutional traders to buy and sell cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether on a spot basis with margin or leverage, similar to traditional commodity trading instruments.
This initiative marks a major shift in U.S. crypto regulation. For years, regulators treated spot crypto as largely unregulated or under-enforced. Now, the CFTC is using its existing authority under the Commodity Exchange Act to extend oversight to spot crypto trading, especially trades involving leverage, margin, or financing.
Leveraged spot crypto products would work like this: A designated contract market (DCM) or registered futures exchange would list spot crypto contracts that are backed by actual delivery of crypto or tracked via underlying assets. Traders could engage in margin trades on the spot market rather than relying solely on futures or derivatives.
This means platforms regulated under the CFTC could list inventory of crypto assets, allow participants to borrow or finance positions, and require clearing, custody, and risk-management frameworks similar to those in commodities markets.
The CFTC recently launched a “listed spot crypto trading initiative,” inviting comment on how to list these products, including how to handle clearinghouses, custodian arrangements, and whether crypto assets are commodities or securities. That initiative referenced Section 2(c)(2)(D) of the Commodity Exchange Act, which specifically governs retail commodity transactions offered on a leveraged, margined, or financed basis.
The CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have also issued a joint staff statement affirming that current law does not prohibit regulated exchanges from listing certain spot crypto asset products, including those with leverage. Together, these regulatory moves signal a clear shift toward opening margin and leverage trading of spot crypto in the U.S.
Regulatory clarity and scale
For years, one of the key obstacles in the U.S. crypto market was uncertainty over how spot trading with leverage could function under existing law. By establishing a path for leveraged spot crypto trading under CFTC authority, the industry gains a bridge to larger-scale, regulated activity.
Margin and leverage could bring more liquidity
Allowing spot crypto trading with margin may attract more participants, both retail and institutional, because they can use less capital to gain exposure. That could increase market depth and volatility.
Domestic competition with offshore exchanges
Many existing leveraged crypto products are offered by overseas exchanges that lack full U.S. oversight. A regulated domestic pathway could shift volume from offshore platforms to U.S. venues, improving transparency and investor protection.
Integration with futures and derivatives markets
Because these spot leveraged products could be listed on futures exchanges, the ecosystem of trading, hedging, and settlement may become more integrated. This could bring spot, futures, and options markets into closer alignment for crypto assets.
The key regulatory anchor is Section 2(c)(2)(D) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), which states that retail commodity transactions offered on a leveraged, margined, or financed basis must be conducted on a DCM or foreign board of trade (FBOT). Historically, this applied to futures and certain commodities. The CFTC is now interpreting this to apply to spot crypto if leverage or financing is involved.
On August 4, 2025, the CFTC launched its listed spot crypto trading initiative. Regulators invited public comments on how to implement listing spot crypto asset contracts on designated contract markets. Meanwhile, the CFTC’s acting chair has engaged with regulated exchanges and clearing organizations to prepare the framework.
Separately, the SEC-CFTC joint staff statement issued in early September affirmed that regulated U.S. exchanges may list spot crypto asset products and that margin and leverage are within scope, provided proper registration and oversight exist.
According to multiple reports, the CFTC is in active discussions with major exchanges, including futures venues such as CME, Cboe, and ICE, as well as crypto-native platforms, to list these leveraged spot products possibly by next month. That timeline positions the rollout sooner than many expected, though final approvals and exchange rule submissions remain necessary.
While this development could scale regulated crypto markets, several risks remain:
Clearing and custody risk: Spot leveraged contracts require robust clearinghouses and custodians. Any weakness in settlement or collateral arrangements could create systemic stress.
Market risk: Leverage amplifies both gains and losses. If leveraged retail positions grow without sufficient risk controls, it could increase volatility or trigger sharp liquidations.
Regulatory arbitrage: As U.S. venues expand these offerings, overseas platforms may still offer different terms. Fragmentation could persist unless the domestic offering is competitive on cost and efficiency.
Securities law overlap: The CFTC’s effort applies to “commodity” crypto assets. If tokens are deemed securities, the SEC retains oversight. Platforms must ensure proper asset classification and compliance.
Exchange rule filings: Watch for futures exchanges or DCMs submitting rule changes or product proposals for leveraged spot crypto contracts.
Clearinghouse partnerships: Expect new collaborations between clearing organizations and crypto custodians, which are essential for safe margin and settlement operations.
Public feedback: The CFTC’s open comment process will reveal where industry stakeholders align or disagree on the proposal’s structure.
Asset inclusion: Bitcoin and Ether are expected to be first, but whether other tokens join early will indicate how broad the regulatory green light truly is.
Margin parameters: The permitted leverage levels, such as 2x, 5x, or 10x, will determine the potential scale of new trading activity.
The CFTC’s push to approve leveraged spot crypto products marks a pivotal moment in U.S. digital asset regulation. It moves the market closer to a structure where spot trading of crypto under margin and leverage is not only possible but also regulated in line with traditional commodities.
For the crypto industry, this means deeper liquidity, greater institutional involvement, and a more secure trading environment. Yet it also raises the stakes. Leverage and margin create opportunity but also amplify risk. The success of this initiative will depend on how carefully exchanges, clearinghouses, and regulators manage execution and oversight.
If the launch proceeds as early as next month, it could accelerate crypto’s integration into mainstream financial markets and bring a new era of regulated spot trading to the U.S. The next few weeks may determine whether leveraged spot crypto becomes a lasting cornerstone of the industry or remains a tightly controlled experiment.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

After months of build-up the U.S. Senate along with state attorneys general have released a landmark draft of crypto market-structure legislation intended to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for the digital asset industry. The bill seeks to establish clearer rules for exchanges, custodians, stablecoins, and token issuers, signalling a major step in integrating crypto markets into the broader financial-regulatory system.
One of the bill’s cornerstone features is the requirement that platforms offering token trading register as exchanges or alternative trading systems under federal law. Custodial service providers will face enhanced capital, segregation, and reporting standards similar to traditional securities and futures firms. This aims to reduce counterparty risk and improve investor protections.
Stablecoins are addressed explicitly in the legislation. Issuers must maintain redemption rights at par value, hold reserves in approved categories, and submit to regular audits. This creates a regulated pathway for stablecoins to operate under federal oversight rather than piecemeal state rules.
The bill also introduces a clearer set of rules distinguishing when a token is treated as a security versus when it remains a commodity or other asset. Token issuers will face registration or exemption requirements depending on utility, liquidity and decentralization factors. This aims to reduce legal ambiguity for projects and improve market integrity.
The legislation mandates cooperation among the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and state regulators. A new federal-state crypto oversight council is proposed to harmonize enforcement, share data and coordinate cross-border investigations.
Exchanges and token issuers will be required to disclose meaningful risk information, liquidity metrics and relationship with affiliated entities. Retail investors would gain clearer visibility into where their assets are held, how trades are processed and what rights they possess in the case of insolvency or cyber-attack.
For years the crypto industry has operated across fragmented regulatory regimes with varying standards. This legislation offers the possibility of a unified federal framework that could increase trust, lower friction and bring institutional capital to the space.
Clearer rules for custody, trading and stablecoin issuance reduce operational risk for large players. Institutional funds, fiduciaries and corporates may be more willing to enter crypto markets if they can rely on regulated entities rather than offshore or lightly supervised platforms.
While increased regulation introduces burden the bill simultaneously provides clarity. Projects now have clearer paths to token issuance, less fear of regulatory surprise and improved access to U.S. markets. The transparency could foster broader crypto ecosystem growth, especially for high-quality protocols.
Regulatory burden & cost Many smaller projects argue that compliance costs may favour large incumbents and stifle innovation in early-stage ecosystems.
Securities law crossover If tokens are treated as securities many projects may face retroactive registration or litigation risk. The timing and grandfathering provisions will matter.
Implementation complexity Coordinating federal and state regulators, aligning rules across 50 states and dealing with cross-border issues will be operationally intense.
Risk of over-regulation Some stakeholders worry the legislation may push innovation offshore or drive it underground if U.S. rules become too restrictive compared to global peers.
Senate floor votes and committee mark-ups The timeline for passing the legislation will influence market sentiment and business planning.
Rule-making phases Exchanges, custodians and token issuers will monitor how the SEC, CFTC and new oversight council implement the rules.
Stablecoin ecosystem response Will major stablecoin issuers adjust to the new reserve and audit standards and maintain parity?
Token classification outcomes How many tokens will be reclassified as securities and how quickly issuers will respond?
Global regulatory spill-over Other jurisdictions may adopt similar frameworks or respond to U.S. leadership in crypto regulation.
The release of this crypto market-structure legislation marks a milestone in the maturation of the digital asset industry. By creating clearer rules for exchanges, custodians and issuers the U.S. is signalling that crypto is not outside the financial system—it is increasingly part of it.
For markets this means the potential for deeper liquidity, institutional participation and broader adoption—but also higher expectations around compliance, governance and transparency. The next phase of crypto may well depend less on token hype and more on regulated infrastructure, institutional trust and sustainable business models.
As this framework moves through Congress regulators and the industry alike will be watching closely. The outcome will shape not just the next bull market, but how crypto fits into global finance for years to come.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Institutional infrastructure is beginning to enter one of crypto’s most promising frontiers: decentralized finance built on Bitcoin. The latest signal comes from Anchorage Digital, which announced it will provide regulated custody services for institutional clients engaging with emerging Bitcoin DeFi platforms such as BOB Finance.
This partnership marks a turning point for the industry. It signals that Bitcoin’s role in decentralized finance is no longer theoretical. It is becoming a regulated, investable reality for institutions that demand compliance, security, and transparency.
For years, DeFi was synonymous with Ethereum and other smart contract platforms. Users could lend, borrow, and trade without intermediaries, while Bitcoin largely remained a store of value. Now, a new wave of developers is extending DeFi’s reach to Bitcoin.
Bitcoin DeFi refers to financial applications built on or around Bitcoin, where users can earn yield, provide liquidity, and interact with decentralized systems while still relying on Bitcoin’s robust network for security. The challenge has always been technical: Bitcoin’s scripting language is limited, so most of these innovations rely on Layer 2 solutions, sidechains, or bridging frameworks that connect Bitcoin to programmable networks.
Anchorage’s move brings something that has been missing: institutional-grade custody and compliance. For funds and corporate investors, this is what transforms experimentation into adoption.
Anchorage Digital is a U.S. federally chartered digital asset bank, one of the few with the regulatory approval to custody digital assets for institutional clients. Its entrance into the Bitcoin DeFi arena changes the calculus for institutional investors who have been hesitant to participate due to security and compliance concerns.
By offering custody and secure access to protocols like BOB Finance, Anchorage provides the backbone institutions need to engage with on-chain Bitcoin yield opportunities. This development not only reduces custody risk but also strengthens confidence that Bitcoin-based DeFi can scale under proper oversight.
For DeFi protocols, institutional custody means more than safety. It opens the door to deeper liquidity pools, regulated capital, and integration with traditional financial systems. The involvement of Anchorage suggests that institutional investors can now treat Bitcoin DeFi as a legitimate extension of their crypto strategy rather than an unregulated niche.
While the total value locked in Bitcoin DeFi remains small compared to Ethereum’s vast DeFi ecosystem, it is growing steadily. Platforms such as BOB Finance are exploring hybrid models that use Bitcoin as collateral while leveraging programmable infrastructure on other chains.
This design lets users access yield and lending opportunities tied directly to Bitcoin without giving up self-custody or transparency. The institutional entry point that Anchorage provides could unlock a wave of new participation from funds and treasuries that were previously sidelined.
Bitcoin’s reputation as the most secure network in the world gives it a natural advantage. If its liquidity and market cap can be mobilized through DeFi infrastructure, Bitcoin could become a productive financial asset, not just a passive store of value.
Bitcoin DeFi’s growth depends on interoperability — the ability to bridge Bitcoin’s stability and security with the flexibility of programmable ecosystems. The emerging solutions often use cross-chain infrastructure to connect Bitcoin to Ethereum-compatible networks, enabling lending, borrowing, and yield generation without losing Bitcoin exposure.
Anchorage’s involvement provides the compliance and governance layer necessary for that interoperability to appeal to institutions. It helps bridge two worlds that have long been siloed: traditional capital markets and decentralized protocols.
Despite growing optimism, Bitcoin DeFi faces clear challenges. The technology remains young, and the bridges connecting Bitcoin to other networks carry smart contract and security risks. Regulatory clarity is also still evolving, especially as global watchdogs evaluate the role of tokenized assets, wrapped tokens, and decentralized lending systems.
However, Anchorage’s move indicates that progress is being made. Institutions are now demanding solutions that balance innovation with accountability, and that demand will accelerate the creation of safer, more transparent systems.
Anchorage Digital’s entry into Bitcoin DeFi represents a significant milestone for both Bitcoin and decentralized finance. It proves that institutions are ready to move beyond Bitcoin as merely a “store of value” and begin using it as a productive, yield-generating asset.
This evolution could redefine how capital flows across the crypto ecosystem. With secure custody, regulatory oversight, and growing cross-chain infrastructure, Bitcoin DeFi is emerging as the next major chapter in the asset’s story — one where Bitcoin becomes not only a symbol of digital sovereignty, but also a cornerstone of decentralized finance itself.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Romania’s National Office for Gambling (ONJN) has placed Polymarket, a popular blockchain-based prediction market, on its national blacklist for operating without a local gambling license. The move marks one of the first times a European regulator has explicitly targeted a decentralized crypto-betting platform.
According to reports confirmed by Yahoo Finance and Gambling Insider, the ONJN issued an updated list of banned gambling and betting sites, adding Polymarket to the roster. The regulator said it would “not allow the transformation of blockchain into a screen for illegal betting.”
The blacklist directs internet service providers in Romania to block access to the listed sites. Operators without a license are considered unregulated gambling entities, regardless of whether they use crypto or fiat currencies.
Polymarket users in Romania have since reported difficulty accessing the platform, which runs on the Ethereum and Polygon networks and allows people to bet on outcomes of political events, sports, and social trends using stablecoins.
Under Romanian law, all gambling or betting platforms that serve local users must register with and obtain authorization from the ONJN. This includes online platforms that use cryptocurrencies.
Polymarket, which positions itself as a “decentralized prediction market,” does not hold a gambling license in Romania. The ONJN therefore treated it as an unlicensed operator, grouping it with dozens of other offshore betting sites that have been banned from local access in recent months.
Romania’s approach reflects a wider regulatory push across Europe to enforce licensing requirements even for decentralized or crypto-based services. Authorities argue that while blockchain can improve transparency, it cannot be used to bypass national gambling regulations.
Polymarket is no stranger to regulatory scrutiny. In 2022, the company paid a civil penalty to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for operating unregistered event-based markets. Since then, it has implemented geo-blocking to limit access from certain jurisdictions.
Romania’s action follows similar moves by other countries tightening oversight of crypto-gambling platforms. Regulators in the United Kingdom, Italy, and the Netherlands have all increased enforcement against unlicensed or offshore betting operators, many of which use cryptocurrencies for wagers and payouts.
These measures form part of a global effort to bring crypto-related gambling into existing regulatory frameworks, focusing on consumer protection, anti-money-laundering compliance, and tax reporting.
For Romanian residents, access to Polymarket is now restricted. Users attempting to visit the site are redirected or blocked by local ISPs. Engaging with unlicensed gambling services can also expose users to penalties under national law.
Globally, the move underscores a clear message from regulators: using blockchain does not exempt a platform from traditional licensing requirements. While crypto-based betting platforms promote transparency and open participation, they remain subject to the same laws as conventional gambling operators.
Polymarket has not publicly commented on the Romanian blacklist, but the platform’s documentation already lists Romania among its “restricted jurisdictions.” The company has previously stated that it aims to operate responsibly within local regulations and continues to expand in markets where prediction markets are permitted.
Industry observers note that Polymarket’s technology itself is not illegal; the challenge lies in regulatory definitions. Many jurisdictions classify markets that allow users to profit from event outcomes as a form of gambling, regardless of how the bets are structured or settled on-chain.
Romania’s decision is part of a larger balancing act between innovation and oversight. Regulators are increasingly recognizing the potential of blockchain technology, but they are also drawing firm lines around activities that resemble gambling or financial speculation.
For crypto-prediction markets, the key challenge ahead will be finding ways to remain open and decentralized while still complying with regional laws.
The ONJN’s statement summed up the sentiment clearly: blockchain cannot be used as a shield for unlicensed betting.
The blacklisting of Polymarket in Romania highlights a new phase in the global conversation about crypto regulation. As blockchain applications expand into areas like prediction markets and decentralized finance, governments are working to ensure these innovations operate under existing legal structures.
For Polymarket, the ban may limit its reach in one European market, but it also reinforces the growing need for dialogue between blockchain innovators and traditional regulators. Transparency and accountability, it seems, will remain central to the next chapter of crypto’s evolution.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.