
A few days before Donald Trump was sworn in for his second term, a little-known crypto company tied to his family quietly changed hands in a very big way.
According to reporting from The Wall Street Journal, an investment network linked to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan, one of the most powerful figures in the United Arab Emirates, agreed to acquire a 49 percent stake in World Liberty Financial, a Trump-associated crypto venture. The price tag was roughly $500 million. The deal was not disclosed at the time.
On its own, that might sound like another splashy foreign investment in crypto. But when you line up the timing, the players involved, and what happened next in Washington, the story is far less routine.
World Liberty Financial has been marketed as a crypto and stablecoin project aligned with the Trump brand. It has drawn attention before for its political overtones, but the WSJ reporting introduced a new layer entirely.
The Journal reported that the agreement gave Emirati-linked investors just under half the company, enough to wield serious influence without triggering automatic control disclosures. Under the agreement, half of the $500 million was paid upfront, with $187 million flowing to Trump family-controlled entities and at least $31 million going to entities affiliated with the family of Steve Witkoff, the real estate magnate who co-founded World Liberty and was later named U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East. Witkoff's son Zach is the current CEO of the project.
The timing did not help the optics. The deal was reached days before inauguration, when policy direction for the next four years was coming into focus and foreign governments were jockeying for position.
David Wachsman, a spokesperson for World Liberty Financial, said the company moved forward with Aryam’s investment because it believes the deal supports World Liberty’s long-term growth. He pushed back on the idea that the company should be held to a higher bar than other privately held U.S. firms when raising capital, calling that notion unreasonable and out of step with core American business principles.
Wachsman said neither President Trump nor Steve Witkoff played any role in the transaction, and that neither has been involved in World Liberty Financial’s operations since taking office. He added that Witkoff has never held an operational role at the company. According to Wachsman, the investment does not give any party access to government decision-making or policy influence, and the company follows the same rules and regulatory requirements as others in the industry.
Sheikh Tahnoon is not a Silicon Valley VC taking a flier on tokens. He is the UAE’s national security adviser, a senior royal, and a central figure in Abu Dhabi’s intelligence, defense, and investment apparatus.
He also oversees or influences a web of firms operating at the intersection of AI, data infrastructure, and geopolitics. That includes G42, an Emirati AI company that has faced scrutiny in the past over its international ties and access to advanced computing technology.
A person familiar with the investment of World Liberty said Sheikh Tahnoon and his team spent months reviewing World Liberty Financial’s business plans before committing capital, ultimately completing the deal alongside several co-investors. The person said the investment did not involve funds from G42.
The source also said the investment was never discussed with President Trump, either during the due diligence process or afterward, and described Tahnoon as a significant investor in the crypto sector.
One reason this story has legs beyond crypto is what happened after the investment.
Following Trump’s return to office, the administration moved on policies involving advanced AI chips, an area where the UAE has been actively lobbying for expanded access. These chips are tightly controlled, highly strategic, and essential for modern AI development.
No reporting has established a direct quid pro quo. There is no document that says money went in and policy came out.
From a governance perspective, this is exactly the kind of situation ethics experts warn about. Even if no one crosses a legal line, foreign investors with deep political ties may gain goodwill, access, or priority simply by being financially intertwined with the president’s broader business ecosystem.
Some legal scholars cited in reporting have raised the emoluments clause, the constitutional provision meant to prevent U.S. officials from receiving benefits from foreign states. Trump’s defenders counter that he is not directly receiving payments and that the structure insulates him from day-to-day involvement.
That argument may hold up in court. It often has before.
But the political risk is broader. Even without a legal violation, the appearance of foreign influence is enough to trigger congressional scrutiny, especially with Trump's polarizing nature and Senate Democrats, many anti-crypto, looking for any angle to stifle crypto innovation and hang Trump out to dry...all at the same time. Some Lawmakers have already begun calling for reviews, especially given the national security dimensions of AI and crypto infrastructure.
This is not just a Trump story or a UAE story. It is a preview of how crypto-era influence works.
Instead of overt lobbying, capital moves through private deals. Instead of formal control, investors stop at 49 percent. Instead of campaign donations, value flows through equity, tokens, and stablecoin rails.
It is cleaner, quieter, and harder to regulate.
Whether or not this specific deal leads to formal investigations or enforcement, it highlights a structural vulnerability. Crypto allows political proximity, financial upside, and strategic infrastructure to blend in ways legacy systems never quite allowed.
And that is why this episode is likely to be studied long after the headlines fade.

On October 23, 2025, President Donald Trump granted a full pardon to Changpeng Zhao, the founder of Binance, in one of the most consequential political and financial moves of the year. The decision effectively clears Zhao’s record, erases the legal barriers tied to his conviction, and reignites a wave of optimism across the global crypto industry.
Zhao, widely known as CZ, previously pled guilty to failing to maintain an effective anti–money–laundering program at Binance. After serving a portion of his sentence and paying a record $4.3 billion settlement, he stepped down from his leadership role. Now, with the stroke of a presidential pen, one of crypto’s most iconic figures is free to return to business, investment, and public life — and the implications could be enormous.
The pardon is being interpreted by market analysts as a signal of shifting sentiment in Washington. For years, U.S. regulators took an increasingly strict approach toward the crypto industry, pushing companies offshore and chilling innovation. Trump’s decision to pardon Zhao suggests a reversal of that stance — one that may emphasize economic growth, innovation, and collaboration over enforcement alone.
Industry insiders say this move could encourage renewed dialogue between major crypto platforms and policymakers, potentially leading to clearer, more constructive regulatory frameworks. For investors, it signals that the U.S. may once again aim to compete globally in the digital–asset economy rather than regulate it from the sidelines.
This could also unlock new institutional confidence. Funds, fintech firms, and traditional banks that were once hesitant to engage with crypto could begin exploring partnerships, investments, and product launches with greater comfort and clarity.
Although CZ stepped away from Binance’s leadership in 2023, he remains a majority shareholder and influential voice within the company. His pardon could mark a turning point for Binance itself, both strategically and symbolically.
The exchange has spent the past two years rebuilding its compliance infrastructure, expanding in regulated markets, and deepening relationships with payment providers and global governments. With Zhao now legally cleared, Binance can move forward without the shadow of its founder’s conviction — a psychological and reputational boost that could help the company reassert its dominance in the market.
Insiders suggest that Zhao could return to an advisory or ambassadorial role, helping Binance pursue strategic partnerships, guide expansion efforts, or even spearhead new ventures tied to blockchain innovation. His renewed presence could also help attract new investors, strengthen the company’s credibility, and inspire other crypto entrepreneurs navigating complex regulatory landscapes.
The ripple effects of the pardon extend far beyond Binance. For the broader crypto ecosystem, this development is being seen as a symbol of legitimacy and maturity. Major figures in the industry have publicly celebrated the move, calling it a moment of reconciliation between government and innovation.
The pardon may help ease political pressure on other leading projects and exchanges, allowing for greater collaboration and policy alignment across the global crypto landscape. It could also spur increased venture funding, new listings, and corporate partnerships as confidence returns to the market.
In the short term, analysts expect renewed momentum in market sentiment — particularly for large–cap cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB — as investors interpret the decision as a green light for the industry’s future.
For Changpeng Zhao, the pardon represents a personal and professional revival. Once at the center of regulatory controversy, he now stands as a symbol of resilience and reinvention. For the crypto industry, it represents something larger — a sign that the sector is entering a new chapter marked by accountability, recognition, and global growth.
The message is clear: after years of legal battles and uncertainty, crypto may finally be turning the corner toward mainstream acceptance. With CZ free to participate once again and Binance positioned for renewed expansion, the digital–asset world appears ready to move forward with confidence and purpose.

Coinbase has officially placed BNB (Binance Chain’s native token) onto its asset roadmap, signaling that a future listing is under consideration. At the same time, the exchange is caught in a growing industry dispute over whether centralized exchanges charge hidden listing fees—despite public claims of fee-free listings.
Coinbase’s new roadmap entry for BNB suggests the exchange is shifting closer to the Binance ecosystem, expanding cross-chain asset access. The move aligns with Coinbase’s recent “Blue Carpet” listing framework, which aims for more transparent, merit-based asset onboarding.
BNB’s inclusion may also bring fresh trading volume, liquidity, and user demand to Coinbase, especially as institutional and retail interest in chain interoperability continues to rise.
Despite Coinbase’s assertion that token listings are free, several industry figures have challenged that statement. Andre Cronje of Sonic Labs claims his projects were quoted tens to hundreds of millions in “listing or financing demands” from Coinbase. In contrast, Binance has been accused less frequently, with some claiming it imposes zero fees for listings.
These conflicting perspectives have ignited a broader debate: are “free listings” just marketing, or is there a real cost — whether in tokens, “marketing support,” or required deposits — behind the scenes?
To address concerns, Coinbase recently published a public listing roadmap that clarifies which assets are under review, which criteria apply, and how decisions are made. This framework aims to reduce speculation, discourage insider leaks, and bring more fairness to the listing process.
Still, critics argue the roadmap’s existence does not guarantee uniform treatment. Smaller or newer projects may struggle to meet the high compliance and technical bar, regardless of the stated transparency.
Cross-chain growth: Listing BNB could accelerate bridging, utility, and user migration across Binance and Ethereum ecosystems.
Market dynamics: BNB’s arrival at Coinbase may shift liquidity, trading pairs, and user behavior.
Industry pressure: The listing fee row places exchanges under scrutiny to improve accountability.
Competitive signaling: Coinbase’s roadmap and listing decisions may push competitors to match transparency or reevaluate fee policies.
Coinbase’s decision to consider BNB for listing is a bold strategic move in the evolving crypto landscape. But more than that, it surfaces tension between public claims and hidden practices in how exchanges decide which assets to support. Transparency, equity, and market access are back in the spotlight — and Coinbase’s actions now will shape how the next wave of token listings is handled.