Revolut has scrapped its plan to buy a U.S. bank, deciding instead to apply for a brand new federal banking license directly from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It's a notable gamble that the regulatory winds have shifted enough under the Trump administration to make the slower, riskier path actually the faster one.

 

The pivot comes after Revolut apparently concluded that acquiring an existing American bank would take longer and create more headaches than originally expected. Sources familiar with the matter say the acquisition route would have forced the digital-only company into owning physical branches, which is basically the opposite of everything Revolut stands for. Not exactly ideal when your whole pitch is "banking on your phone, no branches needed."

 

Reading the regulatory tea leaves

Here's where it gets interesting. Revolut is clearly betting that the new administration's much friendlier stance toward fintech and crypto companies means they can actually get a de novo charter approved in a reasonable timeframe. That would have been borderline laughable just two years ago.

 

The OCC under Biden basically shut the door on crypto firms and fintechs looking for national bank charters. But things changed fast after Trump took office. By late 2025, the agency started conditionally approving charters for companies like Circle and Ripple, which would have been unthinkable under the previous regime. The regulatory floodgates didn't just open, they got ripped off the hinges.

 

So Revolut's calculation seems to be: why spend months or years trying to negotiate an acquisition, deal with integration nightmares, and inherit a bunch of branches we don't want, when we might be able to get a fresh charter approved faster than ever before?

 

The de novo difference

For those not deep in banking arcana, a de novo license means starting from scratch. You're building a new bank rather than buying an existing one. It's traditionally been the longer, harder path because regulators scrutinize new applications intensely.

 

But for a company like Revolut, it has some real advantages. They get to build exactly what they want without dealing with legacy systems, outdated tech stacks, or that branch in Des Moines that somehow still uses fax machines. Everything can be designed for mobile-first customers who expect instant everything.

 

The company already has experience running banks in other markets. They've held a European banking license since 2018 and got a restricted UK banking license in 2024. So it's not like they're starting completely fresh, they know how this game works.

 

Coming from a position of strength

Revolut isn't exactly limping into this application process. The company hit a $75 billion valuation in a secondary share sale back in November 2025, making it one of the most valuable private tech companies in Europe. That funding round pulled in heavy hitters like Coatue, Greenoaks, and even Nvidia's venture arm.

 

The financials back up the hype too. Revolut reported $4 billion in revenue for 2024, up 72% year over year. Pre-tax profit jumped 149% to $1.4 billion. They've got over 65 million users across 39 countries. These aren't struggling startup numbers, this is a company that's figured out how to grow profitably at scale.

 

Right now, Revolut operates in the U.S. through a partnership with Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which limits what they can offer. A full federal banking license would unlock deposit accounts, loans, overdraft protection, basically the full menu of services that would let them actually compete as a primary bank rather than a secondary account people use for travel.

 

Why the U.S. matters so much

The American market is the big prize that Revolut hasn't quite cracked yet. It's the world's largest financial market and arguably the toughest nut to crack for foreign fintechs. But the potential upside is massive.

 

U.S. consumers have shown they're willing to ditch traditional banks for digital alternatives. Chime has millions of customers. SoFi went public. There's clearly appetite for what Revolut does, they just need the regulatory approvals to do it properly.

 

The company calls itself "the world's first global financial superapp," which is the kind of ambitious branding you'd expect from a $75 billion fintech. But you can't really claim to be global if you're hamstrung in the U.S. market.

 

Part of a bigger push

The U.S. license application fits into Revolut's broader expansion blitz. They applied for a banking license in Peru in January 2026, their fifth market in Latin America after Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil. They've also moved into India, got regulatory approval in the UAE, and announced a $1.1 billion investment in France over three years.

 

Latin America in particular seems ripe for disruption. In Peru, the top four banks control over 82% of total loans. That kind of concentration creates opportunities for newcomers, especially ones focused on remittances and cross-border payments where traditional banks tend to charge hefty fees.

 

The crypto angle

Revolut's crypto capabilities might actually help its case, which would have sounded absurd a few years ago. The company runs a crypto exchange called Revolut X and has a MiCA license from Cyprus to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area.

 

Under Trump, the OCC has made clear that crypto activities are fair game for national banks, assuming they have proper risk controls. The agency issued multiple interpretive letters throughout 2025 clarifying that banks can do crypto custody, stablecoin activities, and participate in blockchain networks.

 

The GENIUS Act passed in July 2025 created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing and putting federal banking regulators in charge of oversight. That kind of regulatory clarity is exactly what banks need to feel comfortable offering crypto services without worrying they'll get slapped down later.

 

So Revolut's crypto experience could actually be a selling point rather than a liability, depending on who's reviewing the application.

 

But it's not all smooth sailing

Revolut has some baggage to deal with. The company's customer service has been criticized pretty heavily, with some customers reporting major difficulties resolving fraud claims or getting help with account issues.

 

In 2023, Action Fraud in the UK received 10,000 reports of fraud naming Revolut, which was more than Barclays, one of Britain's biggest banks. Consumer organization Which? has warned people not to keep large amounts of money with Revolut, citing concerns about fraud reimbursement.

 

Those aren't the kind of headlines that make regulators eager to approve your banking license application. The OCC is going to want to see evidence that Revolut has seriously upgraded its consumer protection and customer support operations. A few bad reviews are one thing, but systematic problems with fraud response could sink the whole application.

 

What's next

Revolut confirmed it's exploring multiple paths for U.S. expansion but the de novo license is currently the priority. They haven't said when they'll formally submit the application or how long they expect the process to take.

 

The OCC typically aims to make decisions within 120 days of accepting an application, though that timeline can stretch depending on complexity. Given Revolut's size, international operations, and the breadth of services they want to offer, this probably won't be a quick rubber stamp approval.

 

Still, the recent approvals for crypto-focused companies suggest the regulatory environment is about as friendly as it's been in years. If there was ever a time to roll the dice on a de novo application, this is probably it.

 

Bigger picture for fintech

Revolut's strategic flip illustrates how quickly regulatory changes can reshape business strategy. Two years ago, every fintech was looking at acquisitions as the realistic path into U.S. banking. Now the calculus has completely reversed for some companies.

 

The Trump administration's lighter touch on fintech and crypto regulation has opened a window that might not stay open forever. Companies are rushing to get applications in while the getting's good. Whether this regulatory approach proves sustainable long-term is anyone's guess, but for now it's created opportunities that simply didn't exist under the previous administration.

 

For Revolut specifically, cracking the U.S. market is kind of the final boss level in their quest to become a truly global financial platform. They've got strong financials, solid user growth, and a regulatory environment that's actually receptive to innovation for once.

 

The next few months will show whether their bet on going the de novo route pays off, or if U.S. banking regulation proves too complex even for a $75 billion company to navigate smoothly. Either way, it's going to be an interesting case study in how fintechs approach regulatory strategy in an era of rapid political change.

 

One thing's for sure though: if Revolut pulls this off, expect every other major fintech to start reconsidering their U.S. market strategies too.

Stripe, the payments giant, is making a bold move into crypto. Its stablecoin division, Bridge, is applying for a U.S. national trust bank charter with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). If approved, Stripe would join companies like Paxos and Anchorage Digital in operating under direct federal oversight — a big step for credibility in the stablecoin world.

But Stripe isn’t just planning to issue a token of its own. It wants to build the rails that let any company create and manage its own stablecoin.

---

From Payments to Stablecoin Infrastructure

Earlier this year, Stripe acquired Bridge, a startup that provides the tech to issue, move, and manage stablecoins. With that acquisition, Stripe signaled it wasn’t content to just process payments — it wants to power the next wave of digital money.

Now Stripe has announced Open Issuance, a service that lets businesses launch their own stablecoins in days instead of months. The platform handles minting, burning, and managing reserves, while giving issuers flexibility over how their tokens are backed — whether with cash, U.S. Treasuries, or a mix.

Companies that use Open Issuance keep the revenue generated from their reserves, minus a small service fee Stripe charges. Big names in finance, including BlackRock and Fidelity, are reportedly involved as asset managers to help oversee reserves.

---

Why the OCC Charter Matters

A national trust bank charter would put Stripe under the same regulatory umbrella as traditional banks when it comes to custody and stablecoin reserves.

• One license, not 50. Instead of applying for licenses state by state, Stripe could operate nationally under federal rules.

• Greater trust. Businesses and regulators would see stablecoins issued through Stripe as safer, since they’d be backed by a regulated entity.

• Custody power. Stripe would be able to legally hold reserves and handle settlements directly.

This move also lines up with the GENIUS Act, a U.S. law passed in 2025 to regulate stablecoins. The law requires issuers to operate under banking rules, and Stripe is trying to get ahead of that curve.

---

A Broader Trend in Stablecoins

Stripe isn’t alone.

• Circle, issuer of USDC, has applied for its own federal charter.

• Paxos and Anchorage already hold charters.

• Ripple has filed for one too, tying it to its RLUSD stablecoin.

At the same time, PayPal, Revolut, and even large U.S. banks are exploring stablecoin offerings. Stripe’s advantage: instead of pushing a single token, it’s positioning itself as the infrastructure provider that powers many.

---

Early Experiments: Visa + Bridge

Stripe’s vision isn’t just theory. In April 2025, Visa partnered with Bridge to launch stablecoin-linked cards in Latin America. These cards let users pay in stablecoins, while Bridge handles the behind-the-scenes conversion to local currency.

It’s a small glimpse of how stablecoins can move beyond crypto exchanges and into everyday finance.

---

Why It Matters

Stripe believes stablecoins can unlock “trillions of dollars in tokenized assets.” To get there, though, the industry needs:

• Regulation that builds trust,

• Infrastructure that makes it easy for businesses to participate, and

• Real-world use cases that show stablecoins are more than just speculative tokens.

If Stripe gets its OCC charter and scales Open Issuance, it could become the default platform for companies that want to tokenize money — just like Stripe today is the default payments processor for many online businesses.

---

The Risks

• Regulatory uncertainty. The OCC takes months to review applications, and approval isn’t guaranteed.

• Market acceptance. Businesses already rely on tokens like USDC and USDT. Stripe will need to convince them to issue or switch.

• Fragmentation. If everyone issues their own stablecoin, liquidity and interoperability could become a challenge.

---

Final Word

Stripe is betting that the future of money is programmable, and stablecoins will be at the center of it. By applying for a bank charter and launching Open Issuance, Stripe is aiming not just to play in the stablecoin market, but to become its backbone.

 

Whether this bet pays off depends on regulation, adoption, and execution. But one thing is clear: stablecoins are no longer just a crypto experiment — they’re becoming a serious part of mainstream finance.