MrBeast has never been subtle about scale. Giveaways get bigger, productions get more expensive, audiences get larger. So when Jimmy Donaldson starts drifting into financial services, it is probably worth paying attention.

 

Quietly, through his company Beast Industries, MrBeast has acquired Step, a mobile banking app aimed mostly at teenagers and young adults. On its own, that might look like a straightforward fintech acquisition. But paired with recent trademark filings tied to crypto and digital finance and a $200 million investment from Tom Lee's Ethereum investment company, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, it starts to look like something more deliberate.

 

 

 

Why Step Matters More Than It Looks

Step is not a household name, but in fintech circles it has been around for a while. The app was built to help younger users manage money early, offering basic banking features, debit cards, and tools meant to make finance feel less intimidating.

 

Like many consumer fintech startups, Step grew fast when money was cheap and slowed when markets tightened. That made it a candidate for acquisition, especially by a company with a built-in distribution engine the size of MrBeast’s audience.

 

For Beast Industries, Step is a shortcut. It already has users, regulatory relationships, and a working product. MrBeast does not have to start from zero or ask people to trust a brand new financial app. He is buying something real and then putting his brand behind it.

 

That is a very different approach from the usual influencer playbook.

 

 

The Crypto Part Is Not Front and Center, Yet

So far, there is no MrBeast token, no flashy crypto launch, no giveaways tied to wallets or NFTs. That is probably intentional.

 

Instead, trademark filings for “MrBeast Financial” outline a much broader vision. Banking, payments, investing, crypto trading, even decentralized finance concepts are all on the table. It reads less like a meme project and more like a blueprint for a full financial platform.

 

If this eventually launches, crypto would likely sit alongside traditional services rather than replace them. Think less about hype cycles and more about gradual exposure. Users open an account, use it like a normal banking app, and over time gain access to digital assets in a familiar environment.

 

Given how badly celebrity crypto projects have burned users in the past, that restraint may be the smartest part of the strategy.

 

 

A Perfect Fit for His Audience

MrBeast’s audience is young, global, and extremely online. Many of them have never walked into a bank branch. They are comfortable with apps, digital payments, and online money, even if they are still figuring out how finance works.

 

That overlap with Step’s original target market is almost too neat.

 

There is also the education angle. MrBeast has built an entire career on making people pay attention to things they normally would not. Financial literacy is not exciting. But challenges, rewards, and gamified learning are very much his lane.

 

If anyone can make budgeting or saving feel like content instead of homework, it is probably him.

 

 

This Is Where Things Get Complicated

Of course, finance is not YouTube.

 

Banking and crypto both come with heavy regulatory baggage. Expanding Step into something larger would require licenses, compliance teams, partners, and patience. Crypto adds another layer of scrutiny, especially in the US, where regulators are still defining the rules in real time.

 

Trademark filings do not guarantee execution. Plenty of companies file broadly and never ship half of what they outline.

 

Still, the direction is hard to ignore. This is not a casual experiment. Buying a banking app is a commitment.

 

 

The Bottom Line

If MrBeast follows through, this could change how crypto reaches mainstream users. Not through exchanges or speculation, but through everyday financial tools tied to a brand people already trust.

 

It also hints at where the creator economy might be heading next. After ads, merch, food brands, and mobile services, financial products may be the next frontier. They are harder to build, harder to regulate, and much harder to unwind.

 

Which may be exactly why someone like MrBeast is interested.

 

For now, there are more questions than answers. No launch dates, no confirmed features, no official crypto roadmap. But the pieces are starting to line up.

 

MrBeast is stepping into finance, and if he is anything like his past ventures, this will not stay small for long.

 

There’s been a lot of language coming out of Washington lately about stablecoins.

 

Words like "prudence", "guardrails", and "financial stability" get thrown around whenever the CLARITY Act comes up. Coinbase recently pulled their support amid stablecoin issues in the same bill. But if you take a step back, it’s hard not to feel like something else is driving the intensity of the debate. Big banks don’t usually fight this hard over niche policy details unless there’s something material at stake.

 

Browsing the web, trying to find my next article for all of you, I came across a recent report from Standard Chartered’s digital assets research team, led by Geoff Kendrick, and it may just help to explain the fight a bit better. 

 

A Forecast Banks Can’t Ignore

Kendrick’s research doesn’t treat stablecoins as a crypto sideshow. It treats them as a potential alternative home for real money, the kind of money that currently sits in checking and savings accounts. He actually estimated that $500 billion will move from bank deposits to stablecoins by 2028. The idea isn’t that everyone suddenly abandons banks. It’s subtler than that. Even a gradual shift of deposits into stablecoins changes the math for banks in ways they really don’t like. Funding becomes  more expensive, liquidity assumptions get weaker, margins get squeezed. Those aren’t ideological concerns. Those are spreadsheet concerns. And spreadsheet concerns really make banks want to fight the issue.

 

But to understand the real threat to banks, you first have to better understand the business itself. Banks don’t just hold your money. They use it. Under fractional reserve banking, they keep only a slice and lend the rest out to earn interest for themselves. Sure, they'll keep that small portion of your deposit, but the majority gets reinvested through loans and other activities. That’s how they earn money and why they can afford to even pay any interest to you at all, even if it’s usually minimal.

 

This system works because deposits are assumed to be sticky. People don’t move their money often, and when they do, it usually stays within the banking system. Moving from one bank to another.

 

Stablecoins challenge that assumption. They make dollars mobile in a way they haven’t been before.

 

The Shift Is Coming

Right now, most stablecoins feel like tools, not destinations. They’re useful for transfers, trading, and crypto-native activity, but they’re not where most people park idle cash. Yield changes that. The moment a stablecoin starts paying something meaningfully better than a traditional savings account, the comparison becomes unavoidable. A digital dollar that moves instantly, works around the clock, and earns yield starts to look less like a crypto product and more like a better bank balance. That’s when stablecoins stop being adjacent to banking and start competing with it.

 

But, we're still talking mostly about crypto-native people. The real shift happens when stablecoins stop feeling like crypto at all, when they live inside apps people already trust and use every day. When you easily pay for your groceries on your phone without writing down that seed phrase for crypto that sits on a separate wallet that may or may not be linked to payments.

 

PayPal is already experimenting here. Their Paypal USD (PYUSD) exists inside a platform with hundreds of millions of users, and it already lets people move dollars instantly between PayPal and Venmo for free. That’s everyday payment stuff. It’s not a niche oracles or decentralized exchange use case. It’s peer to peer transfers in apps people use for rent, splitting bills, or sending money to family.

 

Cash App has also signaled support for stablecoin payments and more flexible money movement options, even if Bitcoin hasn’t become everyday cash yet. The point is simple: If stablecoins actually become integrated into the way regular people pay for things, save for short-term goals, and move money around, they stop being a "crypto thing” and become an alternative store of value and payment rail to banks.

 

That’s exactly the scenario a bank CFO would find unsettling.

 

Why the CLARITY Act Matters So Much

This is why the fight over stablecoin yield inside the CLARITY Act feels so charged. It’s not really about whether stablecoins should exist. That battle is already over. It’s about whether they’re allowed to become a true alternative to bank deposits. If yield stays restricted, stablecoins grow slowly and remain mostly transactional. If yield is allowed under a clear regulatory framework, they start to compete directly with how banks fund themselves. That’s a much bigger shift.

 

The Bottom Line

If you take Kendrick’s projections seriously, and I know that I do. I have been in this blockchain industry for a decade now. I have seen the shift from Silk Road and from not even being a second thought in Washington to being a presidential election policy issue and talked about at the highest levels of government, from sea to shining sea.

 

But pushback from banks does make sense. It’s not panic. It’s defense. Stablecoins that are easy to use, deeply integrated into everyday payment apps, how people spend their money, and capable of earning yield... threaten something fundamental. They threaten the quiet bargain where banks get cheap access to capital and customers accept low returns in exchange for convenience. Seen through that lens, the resistance to stablecoin yield isn’t surprising at all. It’s exactly what you’d expect when a new form of money starts to look a little too good at doing the job banks have always relied on to make money.

 

I know where I stand on the issue and I'm interested to know what you think. Do banks evolve, embrace stablecoins as inevitability or do they hold on to the old ways for dear life?

 

MoonPay is making a bold move.

 

The crypto payments firm has signed an eight-figure, multi-year title sponsorship deal with the newly launched Moonpay X Games League, becoming the first company ever to put its name directly on an X Games competition format. The partnership signals a deeper push by crypto infrastructure companies into global sports, and a shift in how action sports are being commercialized.

 

Under the agreement, the competition will officially operate as the MoonPay X Games League, or XGL, a team-based, season-long league designed to modernize the X Games brand and create recurring engagement beyond standalone events.

 

A New Era for X Games

For decades, the X Games have been synonymous with big moments rather than long seasons. Events were iconic but episodic, built around festival-style showcases of skateboarding, BMX, snowboarding, and freestyle skiing.

 

The X Games League changes that structure entirely.

 

Instead of isolated competitions, XGL introduces a formal league model with teams, standings, and year-round storytelling. Athletes will compete under team banners across multiple events, creating continuity that mirrors traditional professional sports while staying rooted in action sports culture.

 

X Games leadership has positioned the league as a necessary evolution. Younger audiences increasingly expect ongoing narratives, not one-off spectacles, and sponsors are looking for longer engagement windows rather than weekend-only exposure.

 

MoonPay’s investment gives the league financial stability at launch and a high-profile partner willing to commit for multiple seasons.

 

Why MoonPay Is Doing This

MoonPay has spent the last several years positioning itself as the easiest on-ramp into crypto, focusing less on trading hype and more on payments, infrastructure, and consumer access. Sponsorships have become a core part of that strategy.

 

By aligning with X Games, MoonPay is targeting an audience that is global, young, digitally native, and culturally influential. These are users who may not be active crypto traders today but are comfortable with digital wallets, online payments, and emerging financial tools.

 

The company already has a track record of partnering with gaming, esports, and entertainment brands. Action sports fit naturally into that ecosystem, especially as athletes and leagues explore new revenue models, fan engagement tools, and digital ownership concepts.

 

Just as important, the deal gives MoonPay category exclusivity across crypto and financial services within the league. That means no competing exchanges, wallets, or fintech firms sharing the same stage.

 

Traditional Brands Are Watching Closely

MoonPay is not the only major name backing the X Games League. Legacy action sports sponsor Monster Energy has also signed on as a founding partner, signaling confidence in the league’s long-term viability.

 

That mix of crypto infrastructure and established lifestyle brands reflects where sports sponsorships are heading. New leagues need both cultural credibility and financial scale, and the XGL appears to be aiming for both from day one.

 

For crypto companies, these partnerships are no longer just about logos and hype cycles. They are about legitimacy, durability, and reaching audiences outside the usual crypto echo chambers.

 

What This Says About Crypto and Sports

Crypto sponsorships in sports have gone through boom and bust cycles, especially during the last market downturn. Stadium naming rights and short-term promotional deals often disappeared as quickly as they arrived.

 

This deal feels different.

 

Rather than chasing maximum visibility during a bull market, MoonPay is tying its brand to infrastructure, long-term league development, and athlete ecosystems. It is a slower bet, but potentially a more durable one.

 

For X Games, the partnership provides the financial runway to experiment with new formats, athlete compensation models, and media strategies without relying solely on traditional broadcast economics.

 

Looking Ahead

The MoonPay X Games League is expected to roll out full seasonal competition across both summer and winter disciplines, with teams, rosters, and standings that evolve over time. If successful, it could reshape how action sports are organized and monetized.

 

For MoonPay, the sponsorship is a statement. Crypto infrastructure companies are no longer content operating quietly behind the scenes. They want cultural relevance, mainstream trust, and staying power.

 

Whether the XGL becomes the future of action sports remains to be seen. But one thing is clear. Crypto is no longer just sponsoring moments. It is helping build leagues.

 

 

Revolut has scrapped its plan to buy a U.S. bank, deciding instead to apply for a brand new federal banking license directly from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It's a notable gamble that the regulatory winds have shifted enough under the Trump administration to make the slower, riskier path actually the faster one.

 

The pivot comes after Revolut apparently concluded that acquiring an existing American bank would take longer and create more headaches than originally expected. Sources familiar with the matter say the acquisition route would have forced the digital-only company into owning physical branches, which is basically the opposite of everything Revolut stands for. Not exactly ideal when your whole pitch is "banking on your phone, no branches needed."

 

Reading the regulatory tea leaves

Here's where it gets interesting. Revolut is clearly betting that the new administration's much friendlier stance toward fintech and crypto companies means they can actually get a de novo charter approved in a reasonable timeframe. That would have been borderline laughable just two years ago.

 

The OCC under Biden basically shut the door on crypto firms and fintechs looking for national bank charters. But things changed fast after Trump took office. By late 2025, the agency started conditionally approving charters for companies like Circle and Ripple, which would have been unthinkable under the previous regime. The regulatory floodgates didn't just open, they got ripped off the hinges.

 

So Revolut's calculation seems to be: why spend months or years trying to negotiate an acquisition, deal with integration nightmares, and inherit a bunch of branches we don't want, when we might be able to get a fresh charter approved faster than ever before?

 

The de novo difference

For those not deep in banking arcana, a de novo license means starting from scratch. You're building a new bank rather than buying an existing one. It's traditionally been the longer, harder path because regulators scrutinize new applications intensely.

 

But for a company like Revolut, it has some real advantages. They get to build exactly what they want without dealing with legacy systems, outdated tech stacks, or that branch in Des Moines that somehow still uses fax machines. Everything can be designed for mobile-first customers who expect instant everything.

 

The company already has experience running banks in other markets. They've held a European banking license since 2018 and got a restricted UK banking license in 2024. So it's not like they're starting completely fresh, they know how this game works.

 

Coming from a position of strength

Revolut isn't exactly limping into this application process. The company hit a $75 billion valuation in a secondary share sale back in November 2025, making it one of the most valuable private tech companies in Europe. That funding round pulled in heavy hitters like Coatue, Greenoaks, and even Nvidia's venture arm.

 

The financials back up the hype too. Revolut reported $4 billion in revenue for 2024, up 72% year over year. Pre-tax profit jumped 149% to $1.4 billion. They've got over 65 million users across 39 countries. These aren't struggling startup numbers, this is a company that's figured out how to grow profitably at scale.

 

Right now, Revolut operates in the U.S. through a partnership with Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which limits what they can offer. A full federal banking license would unlock deposit accounts, loans, overdraft protection, basically the full menu of services that would let them actually compete as a primary bank rather than a secondary account people use for travel.

 

Why the U.S. matters so much

The American market is the big prize that Revolut hasn't quite cracked yet. It's the world's largest financial market and arguably the toughest nut to crack for foreign fintechs. But the potential upside is massive.

 

U.S. consumers have shown they're willing to ditch traditional banks for digital alternatives. Chime has millions of customers. SoFi went public. There's clearly appetite for what Revolut does, they just need the regulatory approvals to do it properly.

 

The company calls itself "the world's first global financial superapp," which is the kind of ambitious branding you'd expect from a $75 billion fintech. But you can't really claim to be global if you're hamstrung in the U.S. market.

 

Part of a bigger push

The U.S. license application fits into Revolut's broader expansion blitz. They applied for a banking license in Peru in January 2026, their fifth market in Latin America after Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil. They've also moved into India, got regulatory approval in the UAE, and announced a $1.1 billion investment in France over three years.

 

Latin America in particular seems ripe for disruption. In Peru, the top four banks control over 82% of total loans. That kind of concentration creates opportunities for newcomers, especially ones focused on remittances and cross-border payments where traditional banks tend to charge hefty fees.

 

The crypto angle

Revolut's crypto capabilities might actually help its case, which would have sounded absurd a few years ago. The company runs a crypto exchange called Revolut X and has a MiCA license from Cyprus to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area.

 

Under Trump, the OCC has made clear that crypto activities are fair game for national banks, assuming they have proper risk controls. The agency issued multiple interpretive letters throughout 2025 clarifying that banks can do crypto custody, stablecoin activities, and participate in blockchain networks.

 

The GENIUS Act passed in July 2025 created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing and putting federal banking regulators in charge of oversight. That kind of regulatory clarity is exactly what banks need to feel comfortable offering crypto services without worrying they'll get slapped down later.

 

So Revolut's crypto experience could actually be a selling point rather than a liability, depending on who's reviewing the application.

 

But it's not all smooth sailing

Revolut has some baggage to deal with. The company's customer service has been criticized pretty heavily, with some customers reporting major difficulties resolving fraud claims or getting help with account issues.

 

In 2023, Action Fraud in the UK received 10,000 reports of fraud naming Revolut, which was more than Barclays, one of Britain's biggest banks. Consumer organization Which? has warned people not to keep large amounts of money with Revolut, citing concerns about fraud reimbursement.

 

Those aren't the kind of headlines that make regulators eager to approve your banking license application. The OCC is going to want to see evidence that Revolut has seriously upgraded its consumer protection and customer support operations. A few bad reviews are one thing, but systematic problems with fraud response could sink the whole application.

 

What's next

Revolut confirmed it's exploring multiple paths for U.S. expansion but the de novo license is currently the priority. They haven't said when they'll formally submit the application or how long they expect the process to take.

 

The OCC typically aims to make decisions within 120 days of accepting an application, though that timeline can stretch depending on complexity. Given Revolut's size, international operations, and the breadth of services they want to offer, this probably won't be a quick rubber stamp approval.

 

Still, the recent approvals for crypto-focused companies suggest the regulatory environment is about as friendly as it's been in years. If there was ever a time to roll the dice on a de novo application, this is probably it.

 

Bigger picture for fintech

Revolut's strategic flip illustrates how quickly regulatory changes can reshape business strategy. Two years ago, every fintech was looking at acquisitions as the realistic path into U.S. banking. Now the calculus has completely reversed for some companies.

 

The Trump administration's lighter touch on fintech and crypto regulation has opened a window that might not stay open forever. Companies are rushing to get applications in while the getting's good. Whether this regulatory approach proves sustainable long-term is anyone's guess, but for now it's created opportunities that simply didn't exist under the previous administration.

 

For Revolut specifically, cracking the U.S. market is kind of the final boss level in their quest to become a truly global financial platform. They've got strong financials, solid user growth, and a regulatory environment that's actually receptive to innovation for once.

 

The next few months will show whether their bet on going the de novo route pays off, or if U.S. banking regulation proves too complex even for a $75 billion company to navigate smoothly. Either way, it's going to be an interesting case study in how fintechs approach regulatory strategy in an era of rapid political change.

 

One thing's for sure though: if Revolut pulls this off, expect every other major fintech to start reconsidering their U.S. market strategies too.

Rain’s Big Raise Signals Stablecoins Are Moving Toward Everyday Money

 

Rain just raised $250 million at a valuation just shy of $2 billion, and the size of the round is only part of the story.

What really stands out is what investors are backing. This is not a bet on a new token, a trading platform, or a speculative crypto narrative. It’s a bet that stablecoins are quietly becoming part of the global payments system, and that Rain is positioning itself as one of the companies building the pipes.

For years, stablecoins have been treated as a behind-the-scenes tool for traders and crypto-native users. Rain is trying to move them out of the background and into everyday spending.

 

What Rain Actually Builds

Rain describes itself as stablecoin payments infrastructure, but in practice, it operates more like a full-stack payments company.

The platform allows partners to issue payment cards that are directly connected to stablecoin balances. Those cards can be used anywhere Visa is accepted, which immediately changes how practical stablecoins become for everyday use. From the user’s perspective, it looks and feels like a normal card transaction. Under the hood, the value is settled using stablecoins.

Rain also provides wallets, on- and off-ramps, compliance tooling, and APIs that enterprises can plug into. The goal is to let fintechs, crypto companies, and global platforms launch stablecoin-based payment products without having to build payments infrastructure from scratch.

This setup is already live across more than 150 countries, giving Rain a global footprint that goes well beyond experimental pilots.

 

The Visa Connection Is a Big Part of the Story

One of the reasons Rain stands out is its direct relationship with Visa.

Rain is a Visa principal member, which means it can issue cards directly on the Visa network rather than relying on third-party sponsors. That status is not trivial. It places Rain closer to traditional payments infrastructure while still operating on crypto rails.

Even more important is how settlement works. Rain has been involved in Visa’s move toward stablecoin settlement, allowing card transactions to be settled on chain using stablecoins rather than relying entirely on legacy banking settlement systems. That opens the door to faster settlement cycles, including weekends and holidays, and reduces some of the friction that exists in traditional cross-border payments.

In simple terms, Visa handles the merchant acceptance and point-of-sale experience. Rain handles the stablecoin side of the transaction. Together, they create something that looks familiar to users but operates very differently in the background.

 

Why Investors Are Paying Attention

Rain’s growth metrics look more like a payments company than a typical crypto startup.

The company reports billions of dollars in annualized transaction volume, rapid growth in active cards, and a growing list of enterprise partners using its infrastructure to launch payment programs. That traction helps explain why investors were willing to price the company near $2 billion in this round.

The investor roster also tells a story. The round was led by a major growth firm, with participation from both traditional venture capital and crypto-focused investors. That mix suggests Rain is being viewed as a bridge company, one that sits between fintech and crypto rather than fully in either camp.

The fresh capital is expected to support expansion into new markets, deeper enterprise integrations, and continued investment in compliance and licensing, which remain critical for any payments business operating at global scale.

 

Stablecoins Are Shifting From Trading Tools to Payment Rails

Rain’s rise comes as stablecoins themselves are going through a quiet identity shift.

They still play a major role in trading and on-chain finance, but more companies are now looking at them as a way to move dollar-like value globally with fewer intermediaries. The challenge has always been usability. Most people do not want to think about wallets, gas fees, or blockchain confirmations when they pay for something.

Rain’s model hides that complexity. Users swipe a card. The merchant gets paid. The settlement happens using stablecoins in the background.

That approach aligns with a broader trend across payments and fintech, where blockchain is increasingly treated as infrastructure rather than a product in itself.

 

A Competitive Landscape and Real Execution Risk

None of this guarantees success.

The space is getting crowded. Other crypto infrastructure companies are building similar tools, and large fintechs and banks are experimenting with stablecoin settlement of their own. Regulatory frameworks are evolving, but uncertainty still exists, especially across jurisdictions.

Rain’s challenge now is execution. Scaling payments infrastructure is hard. Doing it globally, while staying compliant and reliable, is even harder. The Series C gives Rain the resources to try, but the next phase will be about proving that stablecoin-powered payments can move from niche programs to mainstream usage.

 

Why This Matters

Rain’s funding round is a signal that the crypto market’s focus is shifting again.

Not toward speculation, but toward utility. Not toward flashy narratives, but toward infrastructure that quietly connects crypto to the real economy.

If stablecoins are going to become everyday money, they will need to work through systems people already trust and understand. Rain’s partnership with Visa, and its push to make stablecoin settlement invisible to users, suggests one possible path forward.

 

That makes this raise more than just another big crypto funding headline. It marks a moment where stablecoins start to look less like an experiment and more like a serious part of the global payments conversation.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Stablecoins May Be Crypto’s Most Important Success Story

 

Stablecoins are not exciting.

They do not spike overnight. They do not crash and wipe out portfolios. They are not the thing people argue about on social media at two in the morning. Most days, they are barely mentioned at all.

And yet, when you look past the noise and actually follow where money moves in crypto, stablecoins are everywhere. They sit in the background of trades, payments, payouts, and transfers. They are the part of crypto people rely on without thinking about it.

That is usually how real adoption starts.

 

The Boring Part of Crypto Is Doing the Heavy Lifting

Stablecoins exist to do one job: move money without drama.

They are designed to stay pegged to a currency, usually the US dollar. One token equals one dollar. No guessing. No watching charts. No hoping the price holds long enough to send a payment.

That might not sound revolutionary, but in crypto, it is a big deal.

For years, using crypto for anything practical meant dealing with volatility. Stablecoins remove that problem. They let people move value on-chain without turning every transaction into a speculative bet.

That is why traders use them. That is why businesses are paying attention. And that is why stablecoins quietly became the default currency of crypto.

 

Why Stablecoins Keep Growing Even When Markets Cool Off

When markets slow down, most crypto activity drops with them. Stablecoin usage usually does not.

The reason is simple. Stablecoins are not about price. They are about function.

Traditional financial systems are slow and expensive in ways people have mostly just accepted. Transfers take days. Cross-border payments get complicated fast. Fees show up in places no one asked for.

Stablecoins cut through a lot of that. They settle quickly. They move globally. They do not care what day it is or which country you are in.

For individuals, that means easier access to dollar-denominated money. For companies, it means faster settlement and fewer moving parts. None of that depends on whether the market is up or down. Daily users of stablecoins has grown tremendously in the last few years and people should expect to see that continue to skyrocket as more payment rails and use-cases come on board.

 

 

A Lot of Stablecoin Usage Is Invisible on Purpose

One reason stablecoins feel easy to ignore is because they are often hidden.

In many cases, users never touch them directly. A payment looks normal. A balance looks normal. Behind the scenes, stablecoins handle settlement because they are simply better at it.

This is not crypto trying to replace everything at once. It is crypto quietly fixing specific parts of the system that were not working very well to begin with.

And when something works smoothly, no one talks about it.

 

The Real Power Is in Controlling the Flow

The companies that benefit most from stablecoins are often not the ones issuing them.

They are the ones sitting in the middle of payments, wallets, and settlement. They already control how money moves. Stablecoins just make that movement cheaper and faster.

From that position, it does not really matter which stablecoin wins. Volume is what matters. Flow is what matters. Stablescoins are used in a wide variety of settlements and those are growing everyday.

 

 

What Mass Adoption Actually Looks Like

Crypto mass adoption was never going to look like everyone trading tokens or using complex on-chain tools.

It was always going to look boring.

It looks like people getting paid faster. It looks like cheaper transfers. It looks like money moving globally without anyone thinking twice about it.

Stablecoins fit that picture better than almost anything else crypto has produced. They lower the barrier instead of raising it. They work with existing habits instead of fighting them.

For many people, stablecoins are the first time crypto feels practical.

 

Why Stablecoins Matter, Even If They Never Trend

Stablecoins change how money moves.

That turns out to be a much more useful problem to solve.

They support trading. They power on-chain finance. They help businesses operate across borders. They give people access to stable value when local systems fall short.

They do all of this quietly, without asking for attention.

And that is probably why they are working.

Stablecoins are not the loudest part of crypto. They might never be.

But they are becoming the part that actually touches real economic activity at scale. Not in theory. In practice.

By the time stablecoins feel obvious, they will already be everywhere.

 

That is usually how infrastructure wins.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

U.S. FDIC Moves to Define Stablecoin Rules, Bringing Washington Closer to a Real Framework

For years, stablecoins have lived in an uncomfortable gray zone in the U.S. financial system. Big enough to matter, but never quite official enough to be fully welcomed. That may finally be changing.

On December 16, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took a significant step by proposing the first formal rules for stablecoins under the recently passed GENIUS Act. It is the clearest signal yet that Washington intends to treat certain stablecoins less like an experiment and more like financial infrastructure.

This is not a sweeping overhaul overnight. But it is a meaningful start.

 

What the FDIC Is Actually Proposing

The FDIC’s proposal focuses on process before product. Rather than setting hard capital or reserve requirements immediately, the agency is laying out how banks can apply to issue stablecoins through regulated subsidiaries.

In simple terms, the rule defines how a bank asks permission, what information regulators expect to see, how long the FDIC has to respond, and what happens if an application is rejected.

Under the proposal, banks would submit detailed applications covering governance, risk management, compliance controls, and operational readiness. The FDIC would have set timelines to review submissions, determine whether they are complete, and issue approvals or denials. There is also an appeals process, which is notable in a space where regulatory decisions have often felt opaque.

There is even a temporary safe harbor for early applicants, giving institutions a window to engage before all GENIUS Act requirements fully take effect.

None of this is flashy. That is the point.

 

Why the GENIUS Act Changed the Conversation

The FDIC’s move only makes sense in the context of the GENIUS Act, which passed earlier this year after years of stalled crypto legislation. The law created a new category for payment stablecoins and, crucially, decided who gets to supervise them.

Under the act, stablecoins designed for payments are no longer left floating between agencies. The FDIC is responsible for stablecoin-issuing subsidiaries of insured banks, while other regulators handle different corners of the market.

The law also sets the broad expectations. Stablecoins must be fully backed, redeemable at par, and supported by transparent reserves. They are not treated as securities, and they are not left entirely to state regulators either.

That clarity alone has shifted the leading question from “Is this allowed?” to “How does this work in practice?”

 

A Quiet but Important Shift

What stands out about the FDIC proposal is how procedural it is. This is not Washington hyping innovation or trying to pick winners. It is regulators building guardrails, slowly and deliberately.

That may frustrate parts of the crypto industry that hoped for faster approval paths or broader access for nonbank issuers. But for traditional financial institutions, this kind of rulemaking is familiar. It reduces uncertainty, and uncertainty is often the biggest barrier to participation.

Banks have been hesitant to touch stablecoins directly, not because they lacked interest, but because the regulatory consequences were unclear. This proposal begins to close that gap.

 

What Comes Next

The current proposal is only the first layer. The FDIC and other agencies are expected to follow with rules covering capital, liquidity, reserve composition, and ongoing supervision.

Those details will matter. A lot.

Too strict, and stablecoin issuance could remain concentrated among a small number of players. Too loose, and regulators risk recreating the same fragilities they are trying to prevent.

There is also the question of how these U.S. rules will interact with frameworks emerging in Europe and Asia. Stablecoins move across borders easily. Regulation does not.

 

Why This Matters Beyond Crypto

Stablecoins are no longer just a crypto market issue. They sit at the intersection of payments, banking, and monetary policy.

If regulated correctly, they could make settlement faster, cheaper, and more resilient. If handled poorly, they could introduce new forms of run risk into the financial system.

The FDIC’s proposal suggests regulators understand that tension. This is not an endorsement of stablecoins, but it is an acknowledgment that they are not going away.

After years of debate, enforcement actions, and regulatory silence, the U.S. is finally starting to write the rulebook. Slowly. Carefully. And very much on its own terms.

 

That alone marks a turning point.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

YouTube Adds PayPal Stablecoin as Payout Option for U.S. Creators

 

YouTube letting U.S. creators get paid in PayPal’s stablecoin, PYUSD, might sound like a small update. It isn’t. It’s one of those changes that looks minor on the surface but actually says a lot about where tech and finance are headed.

This is a major platform, at massive scale, choosing to plug digital assets into a real payout system. Not a test. Not a pilot hidden in a corner. A real option for real creators.

And that matters.

 

Why YouTube’s Move Feels Different

YouTube touches millions of creators and billions of users. When a platform like that makes a decision, it’s usually because the risk feels manageable and the upside feels real.

Creators now have another way to get paid. Faster access to funds. More flexibility. Less dependence on slow banking rails. For some creators, especially those working internationally or managing income across platforms, that can make a noticeable difference.

What’s interesting is how this is being done. YouTube itself isn’t diving into crypto head first. PayPal handles the complexity. The blockchain stuff stays in the background.

That was actually the point. PayPal’s head of crypto, May Zabaneh, put it plainly.

“The beauty of what we’ve built is that YouTube doesn’t have to touch crypto and so we can help take away that complexity,”

She added that PayPal introduced the PYUSD payout option for payment recipients in the third quarter of 2025, with YouTube choosing to extend it only to U.S. creators.

That quote says a lot. Adoption works best when users don’t have to think too hard about what’s happening under the hood.

 

This Isn’t Just About YouTube

The bigger story is that this keeps happening. Not loudly. Not with flashy marketing. Just steadily.

Payment companies are experimenting with stablecoins. Fintech platforms are adding crypto rails next to traditional ones. Big institutions are building infrastructure instead of arguing about whether crypto is real.

That’s usually the sign that something is maturing.

Digital assets are starting to look less like a bet and more like plumbing. Not exciting, but very important.

 

Stablecoins Are Doing the Heavy Lifting

A big reason this works is stablecoins.

They’re boring by design. Pegged to the dollar. Predictable. No wild price swings. That’s exactly why companies are comfortable using them for payouts.

For creators, it feels familiar. You’re still getting paid in dollars. It just moves faster and sometimes with fewer fees. The crypto part doesn’t have to be front and center.

That’s a good thing.

 

Trusted Brands Make a Difference

PayPal being involved matters more than people realize.

Most users don’t want to manage wallets or worry about private keys. They want to get paid and move on with their day. PayPal already has trust, compliance, and global reach. Adding stablecoins inside that ecosystem makes adoption feel safe and normal.

That’s usually how new tech wins. Not by forcing people to learn everything, but by quietly fitting into what already works.

 

What This Means for Creators and Users

For creators, this is about options. Choice matters.

Some will stick with traditional payouts. Others will experiment with stablecoins. Over time, those options can lead to better cash flow, easier global payments, and new ways to manage income.

For users more broadly, this kind of integration pushes innovation forward. Once digital asset rails exist, new tools and services tend to follow. Better monetization. Faster payments. More global access.

It doesn’t all happen at once, but it builds.

 

Why This Is a Positive Signal Long Term

This kind of adoption doesn’t happen if companies think digital assets are a passing trend. It happens when the technology feels useful enough and stable enough to deploy at scale.

There are still risks. Regulation will keep evolving. Education is still needed. But the direction is clear.

Digital assets are no longer sitting on the sidelines. They’re being woven into systems people already use, without much fuss.

 

YouTube offering stablecoin payouts is a quiet move. But quiet moves from big companies are often the ones that matter most.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Kraken Moves Deeper Into Tokenized Equities With Backed Finance Acquisition

Kraken is making a major push into the tokenization market with its agreement to acquire Backed Finance, the company behind the xStocks product line.

This move gives Kraken full control over a growing category of tokenized equities and positions the exchange for rapid expansion as it prepares for a public listing.

 

A Strategic Acquisition With Clear Intent

Backed Finance specializes in issuing tokens tied to real world assets, mainly public company stocks and ETFs. These assets are backed by real shares held in custody, allowing users to hold digital representations of traditional securities inside a blockchain environment.

By bringing Backed Finance in house, Kraken gains control over the entire tokenization stack. Issuance, collateral, custody, compliance, and product architecture will all operate under one roof. This eliminates reliance on an external provider and strengthens Kraken’s ability to innovate and scale. The exchange has been building aggressively in Europe and other global markets, and the acquisition aligns with its larger ambition to make tokenized securities a core part of its ecosystem.

 

Why Kraken Is Doubling Down on Tokenization

Tokenized assets have gained momentum as traders and institutions look for a more flexible way to access traditional financial instruments. The benefit is simple. Stocks can be traded on chain, around the clock, with global reach and fewer barriers.

Kraken’s recent capital raise brought its valuation to roughly twenty billion dollars. The company has been preparing for a public offering targeted for 2026, and expanding into real world asset tokenization helps diversify its revenue streams before going public. Backed Finance already holds meaningful market share in the tokenized equity space, which gives Kraken a strong foundation to build on.

The acquisition formalizes a partnership Kraken has spent the past year expanding. Backed has powered xStocks since launch, supporting products that have now generated more than $5 billion in cumulative trading volume on Kraken. 

 

The Broader Market Context

Interest in real world asset tokenization has surged through 2025, but the sector still faces challenges. Liquidity varies widely across tokenized securities. Some assets trade actively, while others see thin volume. This raises questions about whether tokenization alone can deliver deeper markets.

Regulatory frameworks are also evolving. Tokenized shares do not always offer the same rights as traditional equities, such as voting or regular dividend distribution. As more platforms introduce tokenized stocks, market fragmentation becomes a risk, since liquidity can spread across multiple chains and issuers.

These challenges do not diminish the potential, but they highlight the need for stronger standards, clearer rules, and well capitalized issuers.

 

What This Means for the Future

Kraken’s acquisition signals that tokenized equities are becoming a long term strategic priority rather than a side experiment. If successful, Kraken could set the standard for a hybrid financial model where traditional assets move seamlessly across blockchain infrastructure.

BlackRock executives Larry Fink and Rob Goldstein recently said tokenization could reshape financial markets as profoundly as the early internet reshaped information.

Kraken's users may gain access to more global equities, greater flexibility, fractional ownership, and always available markets. Institutions may find a more programmable way to issue and settle securities. The industry may see a blueprint for bridging regulated markets with decentralized technology.

 

The path will not be simple. Liquidity, compliance, and investor protections will remain central areas of focus. However, Kraken’s move shows that major players believe the future of equities includes both traditional exchanges and blockchain based markets working together.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Robinhood’s Crypto Revenue Soars, Signaling Surge in Retail Crypto Engagement

Robinhood Markets reported that its cryptocurrency-trading revenue surged by 339% in Q3 2025 to $268 million. This performance underscores the increasing role of crypto in Robinhood’s business model and reflects broader retail investor enthusiasm for digital assets. The rise comes against a backdrop of product innovation, global expansion and favorable sector sentiment.

 

Strong Performance Across the Platform

While crypto trading was a standout, Robinhood’s overall performance paints a positive picture of a company gaining traction. Earlier in the year the company reported Q2 revenue of $989 million, up 45% year-on-year and with crypto revenue alone up 98% to $160 million. The momentum built into stronger Q3 performance where crypto contributed a larger share of transaction-based revenues. The company’s expanded crypto product offerings, including new tokens, staking and acquisition of Bitstamp, helped fuel activity.

 

Why Crypto Revenue Grew So Fast

Several factors helped drive Robinhood’s crypto-business acceleration:

• Retail engagement in crypto trading is high. With more tokens listed, easier access and zero-commission trading, Robinhood has captured more users’ attention.
• Global expansion. The acquisition of Bitstamp gave Robinhood more licensing in Europe and access to more markets, increasing liquidity and cross-border trading.
• New product launches. Added services such as crypto staking in the U.S. and EU, tokenized stocks, and enhanced platform features boosted user activity.
• Macro environment. Periods of heightened crypto volatility and interest often correspond with higher trading volumes and revenue for platforms like Robinhood.

 

Implications for Robinhood and Crypto Platforms

For Robinhood, the spike in crypto revenue suggests the firm is successfully evolving beyond a retail stock-trading app into a broader digital-asset-centric platform. Crypto trading is no longer a niche segment, it is now a meaningful driver of revenue and growth.

For the broader crypto industry, Robinhood’s results highlight several important trends:

• Retail platforms with strong user bases and simple onboarding for crypto are gaining a larger share of trading volume and attention.
• Crypto is becoming more integrated into mainstream fintech business models, not just peripheral to them.
• Expanding regulatory clarity and global licensing (as seen via Bitstamp acquisition) are helping platforms scale crypto services globally.
• The overlap between equities, options and crypto trading is becoming more pronounced, as platforms leverage overlapping customer bases.

 

What to Watch Moving Forward

• Sustainability of the growth. Strong quarter-to-quarter gains are impressive but maintaining this requires continuous product innovation, user acquisition and regulatory compliance.
• Crypto revenue mix and token exposure. As crypto revenue grows, the breakdown by asset class, trading type and geography will matter for understanding risk and opportunity.
• Platform expansion and licensing. Global regulatory regimes continue to evolve, so Robinhood’s ability to scale globally while maintaining compliance will be key.
• Competitive landscape. Other platforms are competing aggressively in crypto trading, tokenization and wallet services. Robinhood’s product velocity and customer experience will determine how it holds competitive edge.

 

Robinhood’s Market Strength and Expanding Footprint

Robinhood’s impressive crypto performance came alongside strong overall financial results. Although shares dipped about 2% in after-hours trading, the stock remains up roughly 260% year-to-date, reflecting the market’s confidence in the company’s long-term trajectory.

Chief Financial Officer Jason Warnick said the quarter highlighted “another period of profitable growth” and emphasized the company’s diversification. He noted that Robinhood added two new business lines, Prediction Markets and Bitstamp, each already generating around $100 million in annualized revenue.

“Q4 is off to a strong start,” Warnick added, pointing to record trading volumes across equities, options, prediction markets, and futures, along with new highs for margin balances.

The company’s market capitalization has now reached $126 billion, placing it ahead of major competitors like Coinbase, which also reported strong earnings recently.

These results follow a string of moves aimed at deepening Robinhood’s role in the global crypto ecosystem. The acquisition of Bitstamp, one of the world’s oldest crypto exchanges, gave Robinhood an established regulatory presence and a user base spanning more than 50 countries. This acquisition not only expanded access to international markets but also strengthened its compliance infrastructure — a crucial advantage as global regulators define the next phase of crypto policy.

 

Final Thoughts

Robinhood’s record-setting quarter represents more than just strong numbers, it highlights a pivotal transformation in how traditional fintech and digital assets are converging.

The company’s 339% surge in crypto trading revenue reflects growing confidence among retail investors, while its acquisitions and new business lines show a clear pivot toward becoming a comprehensive global trading platform. With Bitstamp under its umbrella and new markets like prediction trading contributing nine-figure revenues, Robinhood is building an ecosystem that spans equities, options, futures, and crypto — all within a single, regulated framework.

Despite the minor dip in after-hours trading, investor sentiment remains overwhelmingly positive. Robinhood’s valuation of $126 billion underscores that the market views the company not as a speculative fintech, but as a major financial institution reshaping digital trading.

As the boundaries between finance and crypto continue to blur, Robinhood’s expansion signals a broader truth: the next generation of global markets will not separate traditional and digital assets. Instead, they will coexist on platforms that offer both speed and security — and Robinhood appears determined to lead that charge.

 

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Ripple Raises $500 Million at $40 Billion Valuation, Signaling Surging Institutional Confidence in Crypto

 

Ripple Labs has announced a landmark $500 million fundraising round led by affiliates of Fortress Investment Group and Citadel Securities, propelling its valuation to approximately $40 billion. The raise cements Ripple’s position among the most valuable private blockchain companies in the world and underscores a powerful shift in institutional sentiment toward digital assets and crypto infrastructure.

Major participants in the round reportedly include heavyweight firms such as Pantera Capital, Galaxy Digital, Brevan Howard, and Marshall Wace, marking one of the most significant institutional-backed financings in the digital asset sector to date. Ripple’s leadership described the round as “a signal that blockchain infrastructure is moving from experimentation to mainstream adoption.”

 

A Strategic Expansion Beyond Payments

Ripple’s identity has long been associated with its cross-border payment technology and the XRP Ledger, but the company has spent the past several years expanding its footprint into institutional finance and enterprise-grade blockchain infrastructure.

This raise is intended to accelerate that strategy. Ripple plans to deploy the new capital across several key business segments, including stablecoin development, digital asset custody, prime brokerage services, and enterprise treasury solutions.

CEO Brad Garlinghouse noted that the company’s focus now extends far beyond the XRP token, emphasizing Ripple’s ambition to build “the next-generation infrastructure for global value exchange.”

Ripple has already launched its U.S. dollar stablecoin, RLUSD, which recently surpassed $1 billion in circulation, and the company’s acquisition of Metaco earlier this year established its presence in institutional digital asset custody. The new capital will help scale both of these ventures, as well as expand Ripple’s global payments and liquidity network, which has already processed nearly $100 billion in volume this year.

 

A Bullish Signal for Institutional Crypto Adoption

The participation of global financial powerhouses such as Fortress and Citadel is a major signal for the broader crypto market. It represents a notable shift from skepticism to conviction among traditional finance institutions, many of which are now actively positioning for the tokenization of assets, the growth of stablecoins, and blockchain-enabled payments.

The timing of the raise also reflects a broader resurgence of confidence in digital assets. Bitcoin’s continued strength above six figures, renewed attention on real-world asset tokenization, and rising institutional demand for compliant crypto infrastructure have all contributed to a more mature and sustainable growth environment.

Ripple’s successful raise at such a high valuation suggests that institutional investors see the company not merely as a crypto firm, but as a core component of global financial modernization. It represents the convergence of blockchain technology and traditional finance, a theme that has gained enormous traction as banks, funds, and corporates explore on-chain settlement and tokenized instruments.

 

Ripple’s Expanding Role in the Financial Ecosystem

The new capital positions Ripple to strengthen its role as a trusted partner for banks, governments, and enterprises looking to bridge traditional financial systems with blockchain innovation.

The company’s growing suite of products—ranging from cross-border payment solutions to custody, stablecoin issuance, and liquidity management—makes Ripple one of the few blockchain firms offering an institutional-grade platform that can integrate directly with existing financial infrastructure.

Ripple’s continued collaboration with regulators and financial institutions has also helped build credibility at a time when compliance and governance are key differentiators. Its ability to maintain relationships with central banks, sovereign partners, and large enterprises gives it a unique advantage as the financial industry transitions into tokenized models.

 

The Broader Message for the Crypto Industry

Ripple’s raise is more than a company milestone—it is a reflection of the growing institutionalization of crypto and blockchain technology. The same financial institutions that once viewed digital assets with caution are now leading billion-dollar funding rounds and integrating blockchain rails into their own operations.

This is part of a wider trend reshaping global finance. The lines between traditional banking, fintech, and crypto are blurring, and firms like Ripple are at the center of this transformation. As capital markets evolve toward digital-native assets, the companies that provide trust, scalability, and compliance will become the foundation of the next financial era.

Institutional investors increasingly view blockchain infrastructure as essential, not experimental. Ripple’s $40 billion valuation confirms that belief, underscoring the market’s confidence in the future of regulated, enterprise-grade crypto solutions.

 

Final Thoughts

Ripple’s $500 million raise represents a turning point not only for the company but for the broader digital asset industry. With leading global financial institutions now backing its vision, Ripple is positioned to become a cornerstone of blockchain-powered finance.

The company’s expansion into stablecoins, custody, and institutional liquidity services shows that it is evolving into a full-stack financial technology provider capable of powering the next generation of value exchange.

For the crypto ecosystem, this moment carries a clear message: institutional adoption is no longer theoretical—it is happening. Ripple’s success highlights how established players in finance are no longer standing on the sidelines but are actively investing in and shaping the future of blockchain infrastructure.

 

As capital flows, partnerships grow, and regulatory clarity improves, Ripple’s rise reflects the dawn of a more connected, compliant, and credible era for global crypto finance.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Against Custodia Bank in Fed Master Account Case

 

A U.S. appeals court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, has affirmed that Custodia Bank is not automatically entitled to a Federal Reserve master account. The ruling supports an earlier decision from a Wyoming district court, which found that the Federal Reserve has discretion in granting or denying master account privileges.

The case centers on a special-purpose depository institution (SPDI) chartered in Wyoming that focuses on digital assets and crypto services. Custodia applied for a master account in October 2020 with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and later sued both the Federal Reserve and the Kansas City Fed for what it described as unfair delay and denial of access.

In its judgment, the appeals court agreed that the Fed acted within its legal authority, rejecting Custodia’s claim that it was unlawfully denied access under federal banking laws.

 

Why It Matters

Access to a master account matters because it allows direct participation in core central bank services such as Fedwire and the Automated Clearing House (ACH). Without it, a bank must rely on a partner institution that already holds an account.

For Custodia and other crypto-friendly institutions, this ruling is significant because it reaffirms that eligibility does not guarantee access. Even if an institution meets charter requirements, the Federal Reserve retains discretion to deny or delay master account access.

For the broader banking and crypto industries, this decision sends a clear message: non-traditional or digital asset banks cannot assume central bank access simply because they hold a state charter. The Federal Reserve’s oversight and standards remain firm.

 

What’s Behind the Legal Battle

• Custodia argued that under the Monetary Control Act of 1980, Federal Reserve services are mandatory for eligible depository institutions. The bank claimed that the word “shall” in the law means entitlement to master account services.

• Regulators and legal experts disagreed, stating that the Federal Reserve Act gives the Fed discretion to assess risks and decide whether to grant access.

• The court found that Custodia failed to show a legally enforceable right to a master account. It also ruled that Custodia did not properly challenge a “final agency action” under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

• The district court judge warned that removing the Fed’s discretion could lead to a “race to the bottom,” with states offering light regulations to attract new banks looking for automatic access to Federal Reserve services.

 

What’s Next for Custodia and the Industry

Custodia may still seek further review, but this ruling narrows the path forward. The company can request a rehearing or appeal to the Supreme Court, though both options face long odds.

For the crypto banking industry, the message is clear: meeting state charter requirements is necessary but not enough. Institutions must also demonstrate strong risk management, compliance, and operational standards that meet Federal Reserve expectations.

Regulators and the financial sector will likely use this case as a precedent to define clearer guidelines for digital asset banks. Risk management, anti-money-laundering measures, and transparent governance will remain top priorities before granting master account access.

This case also signals that the Federal Reserve is cautious about integrating crypto-related banks into traditional financial systems until their risk frameworks align with established banking norms.

 

Final Thoughts

While the ruling is a setback for Custodia, it reinforces an important principle: access to central bank systems comes with oversight and responsibility. The decision does not shut out crypto banks entirely, but it does raise the bar for entry.

For the broader digital asset sector, this moment highlights the ongoing challenge of bridging innovation with regulation. The focus for crypto banks will now shift from arguing for entitlement to demonstrating readiness — proving that they can meet the same safety, stability, and trust standards that define the U.S. banking system.

 

In the end, this case is less about denial and more about definition. It sets the boundaries for what a compliant, well-managed crypto bank must look like if it wants a seat at the table in traditional finance.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.