Stablecoin issuer Circle has raised $222 million in a private presale of its Arc token, the native token of its institutional stablecoin-focused Layer 1 blockchain.

 

The presale was led by venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which invested $75 million. Investors, including BlackRock, Apollo Global Management, Intercontinental Exchange, SBI Group, Janus Henderson Investors, Standard Chartered, General Catalyst, Marshall Wace, ARK Invest, IDG Capital, Haun Ventures, and crypto exchange Bullish, also participated in the funding round.

 

Speaking in an exclusive interview with CNBC, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said the company was building an operating system with multiple stakeholders and major companies that would run the infrastructure supporting the network and contribute to its governance.

 

Allaire also likened the Arc blockchain to a mobile operating system or cloud platform, saying the network was designed to allow major companies to build and operate infrastructure on the chain while participating in governance.

 

The Arc token has an initial total supply of 10 billion tokens. Circle has allocated 60% of the token supply to participants building, using, and contributing to the Arc blockchain. Circle itself will hold a 25% stake, enabling it to act as a validator for the network, while the remaining 15% has been allocated to a long-term reserve. The fundraising gives Arc a fully diluted network valuation of $3 billion. 

 

The launch of the Arc blockchain is aimed at expanding Circle’s business beyond USDC issuance, allowing the company to generate additional revenue from its stablecoin operations while owning and controlling the settlement and distribution infrastructure on which the USDC stablecoin operates. This would reduce Circle’s reliance on blockchains such as Ethereum and Solana, as well as its dependence on Coinbase.

 

Circle Publishes Its First-Quarter Stablecoin Report

Alongside the announcement of its successful presale round, Circle also released its first quarter report for this year, which highlighted strong momentum and adoption of its stablecoin.

 

According to the report, total revenue and reserve income for its USDC stablecoin reached $694 million, marking a 20% year over year increase. USDC on-chain transaction volume also surged to $21.5 trillion in the last quarter, representing a 263% year over year increase.

 

 

Although net income from continuing operations fell 15%, USDC in circulation grew 28% year over year to $77.0 billion by the end of the quarter. The report also highlighted the introduction of Agent Stack, a platform designed by Circle that allows AI agents to conduct autonomous financial transactions using USDC.

 

 

Polygon, the leading Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, has partnered with Hinkal, a blockchain privacy protocol, to launch private stablecoin payments within its crypto wallet.

 

The partnership, according to Polygon, is aimed at bridging the gap between on chain rails and the needs of institutional finance, while facilitating private stablecoin payments among institutional clients that often process large volumes of transactions.

 

 

Talking about institutional clients, Polygon wrote on its blog, “They won't move operational flows onto a ledger that broadcasts every counterparty and every amount to every observer on the network. We've now enabled what institutions expect in the Polygon wallet”.

 

To maintain transparency, most public blockchains are designed to publicly record key transaction details, including information about the sender, the recipient, and the amount sent. While this level of transparency is unmatched, it has, however, prevented large institutions that uphold high standards of privacy from coming on chain.

 

To ensure institutional clients do not continue making this trade off, Polygon, in collaboration with Hinkal, created this stablecoin payment privacy feature that allows both retail and institutional users to make stablecoin payments within the Polygon wallet, while shielding sensitive details about the transaction, including information about the sender, the recipient, and the amount transacted.

 

To provide the best on-chain experience, this privacy feature leverages Polygon’s speed and low-cost transactions and Hinkal’s zero-knowledge proofs, which allow the shielding and routing of stablecoin payments. Since Hinkal is a non-custodial protocol, funds will always remain in the custody of users.

 

Polygon Accelerates Blockchain Expansion Efforts

The rollout of these private stablecoin payments comes a few days after social media giant Meta partnered with Polygon to enable payments to creators in the USDC stablecoin, an initiative that is expected to reach more than 160 countries before the end of the year.

 

As part of its expansion efforts and its big bet on stablecoins, Polygon acquired Coinme, a U.S.-based cryptocurrency cash exchange, in January of this year for $250 million. It has also integrated with and partnered with major traditional finance platforms, including Visa and Mastercard.

 

 

Social media giant Meta is currently running a pilot program that tests issuing creators’ payouts in stablecoins. “Meta now offers USDC stablecoin payouts via supported crypto wallets on the Solana and Polygon blockchain networks,” the team wrote on its Business Help Center page

 

Since this is still a pilot program, only creators in Colombia and the Philippines are currently eligible for the service, with the program expected to expand to more than 160 countries before the end of the year, according to an X post by Polygon Labs.

 

 

While the announcement was well received by many in the crypto community, a spokesperson for Meta clarified the goal of the initiative, stating that Meta was not issuing its own stablecoin but was instead tapping into Circle’s $77 billion USDC stablecoin, with plans to integrate the stablecoin into its payment infrastructure.

 

The Meta USDC creator payout program is currently supported by several popular crypto wallets, including MetaMask, Phantom, and Binance, with global payments platform Stripe handling the technical infrastructure and serving as the payments provider. Solana and Polygon are the only blockchain networks currently supported for this program.

 

Meta Pushes Again Into Crypto After Setbacks

Meta’s recent move into crypto follows several setbacks it has had to deal with in the past. In 2019, it launched Libra, a cryptocurrency which it said could be used across its different social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

 

However, things did not go as planned, as some stakeholders, such as PayPal, Mastercard, and Visa, which were involved in the project, started pulling out due to scrutiny and backlash from U.S. regulators and from some members of the U.S. Congress.

 

Although Meta made several efforts to save the project, including rebranding it from Libra to Diem, a stablecoin backed by the U.S. dollar in an effort to appease federal regulators, nothing worked, as federal regulators stated that the project could not move forward.

 

Other projects associated with Libra and Diem, such as the Novi wallet, a cryptocurrency wallet built by Meta that allowed users to hold and transfer Libra, also failed, and the entire project was eventually wound down. According to Stuart Levey, then CEO of the Diem Association, “it became clear from our dialogue with federal regulators that the project could not move ahead.”

 

 

Volo Protocol, a decentralized finance protocol built on the Sui blockchain, has suffered a security breach that led to the loss of approximately $3.5 million in digital assets.

 

In an effort to maintain transparency, the team in an X post on Wednesday publicly announced the security breach. According to the team, the attack only affected assets in selected vaults, including Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), Matrixdock Gold XAUm, and USDC (USDC).

 

 

On detecting the breach, the team said it acted quickly to contain it and minimize further damage. It stated, “We detected the attack, immediately notified the Sui Foundation and ecosystem partners to contain the damage, and froze the vaults to prevent any further exposure.”

 

As of the time of its first reporting on the incident, the Volo team said that the $28 million in total value locked across other vaults was safe, adding that all vaults on the protocol were temporarily frozen pending a full postmortem and remediation. The team also said it was in damage control mode and was actively working with on chain investigators and ecosystem partners to recover the stolen funds.

 

The team released updates on the hack

Since the hack happened, the Volo team has, in three separate updates, transparently informed the community about the efforts being made to recover the stolen funds.

 

In the first two updates, the team said it was already working with ecosystem partners and had successfully frozen approximately $500 million of the stolen funds, while also intercepting and blocking the hacker’s attempt to bridge 19.6 WBTC. According to the Volo team, these funds were no longer under the hacker’s control.

 

In a third update, the team said it had already frozen $2 million of the stolen funds, and that together with ecosystem partners and security teams, it had flagged the hacker’s EVM addresses across the majority of centralized exchanges, swappers, and KYC tools.

 

The Volo protocol hack came shortly after the KelpDAO exploit and the Drift Protocol exploit, which led to a combined loss of over $570 million, and are currently the largest DeFi hacks that have occurred this year. So far, over $770 million has been lost to DeFi hacks this year.

 

 

Singapore-based fintech company Nium has partnered with cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase to integrate the USDC stablecoin into its global payment network.

 

The integration, announced this week, leverages Coinbase’s custody, liquidity, and wallet infrastructure, allowing Nium’s clients and users to perform cross-border payments in USDC and settle transactions in either stablecoins or local currencies.

 

 

As Coinbase will provide the wallet infrastructure, Nium clients will be able to fund accounts in USDC within a Coinbase wallet embedded in the Nium platform. The USDC can then be converted to fiat currency by Coinbase and paid out through Nium, all within a single workflow on the platform.

 

Through this partnership, Nium will enable end-to-end stablecoin-to-fiat payment flows that allow users to send, receive, and convert stablecoins into fiat across more than 190 countries within a single platform.

 

Speaking about the partnership, Prajit Nanu, CEO of Nium, said it is aimed at providing clients with a more efficient way to move and manage money globally. He added that the collaboration improves capital efficiency while supporting a future in which stablecoins play a central role in Nium’s payment stack.

 

About Nium 

Based in Singapore, Nium is a cross-border payments company that allows users, including retail and institutional clients, to perform cross-border remittances and transactions.

 

Apart from being a core traditional finance company, Nium has in the past made several pro-crypto moves, especially in the stablecoin space.

 

In March of this year, it launched a stablecoin card issuance platform that allows companies holding stablecoins to issue spending cards on both the Visa and Mastercard networks through a single API integration on its platform. To enable USDC settlements on its platform, Nium last year participated in Visa’s stablecoin settlement pilot, which eventually made it possible for the company to settle cross-border transactions using stablecoins across different supported blockchain networks.

 

Like Nium, several other Singapore-based traditional finance companies have taken pro-crypto steps in recent times, integrating blockchain technology and crypto support into their platforms. Notable among them is DBS Bank, Singapore’s largest bank, which launched the DBS Digital Exchange, a platform for asset tokenization, crypto trading, and custody.

 

Cryptocurrency exchanges, including Kraken, OKX, Binance, and Bybit, have also partnered with traditional finance institutions to help bridge the gap between traditional finance and decentralized finance.

 

 

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has rolled out crypto-backed loans for users in the United Kingdom, allowing users to borrow USDC against Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Coinbase Wrapped Staked Ether (cbETH) holdings.

 

The launch, announced this Monday, is part of Coinbase’s overall efforts to build a leading financial app in the UK that allows users to invest, manage, and grow their money.

 

 

The loans will be issued through Morpho, a decentralized finance lending protocol on Base, and according to Coinbase, users will be able to borrow up to $5 million in USDC, depending on the amount of Bitcoin and other eligible assets they hold as collateral. Coinbase says the interest rates will vary, depending on market conditions on Base, and that these rates will be set by Morpho.

 

It is also important to note that while there is no fixed repayment schedule for the borrowed loans, borrowers face liquidation risk if the loan-to-value ratio exceeds specific thresholds that will be set by Coinbase.

 

The crypto-backed loans can be accessed through the Coinbase app, where users can choose the amount of USDC they want to borrow and their preferred collateral asset. Once this is done, the pledged collateral will be transferred on-chain to a Morpho smart contract, and the USDC loans will be automatically disbursed to the user’s Coinbase account, which can then be converted to British pounds (GBP).

 

Coinbase Expands Its Crypto Efforts

Coinbase is one of the cryptocurrency exchanges leading development at the intersection of blockchain technology and artificial intelligence (AI).

 

In an X post last weekend, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the exchange was testing and integrating two AI agents into Slack and email. These AI agents will serve as virtual workers, able to perform on-chain actions such as holding funds, spending and sending money, trading, and earning yield.

 

This recent development comes shortly after Coinbase launched the x402 Foundation, designed to enhance the use of its x402 protocol as a standard payment protocol for internet native payments.

 

To achieve its “Everything Exchange” goal, Coinbase made a number of significant acquisitions last year, including the acquisition of the Deribit exchange and Echo. The exchange has also rolled out stock and ETF trading in-app for all eligible users, with its most recent rollout in Canada.

 

 

Tether has never been shy about playing offense. And in the wake of one of the worst hacks to hit Solana's DeFi ecosystem, the world's largest stablecoin issuer saw an opening, and took it.

 

On April 16, Tether announced a recovery package worth up to $127.5 million for Drift Protocol, the Solana-based perpetual futures exchange that was drained of roughly $285 million on April 1 in a sophisticated hack attributed to North Korean operatives. Combined with $20 million pledged by other partners, the total rescue fund comes to nearly $150 million. But the dollar figure is almost secondary to what Tether actually got in return.

 

The Real Prize: Kicking USDC Off Solana's Biggest Perp DEX

As part of the deal, Drift will swap out Circle's USDC for Tether's USDT as its core settlement asset. That means 128,000 users and more than 35 ecosystem teams, including Gauntlet, Neutral, and M1, all migrate to a USDT-based trading environment. On a network where USDC has historically dominated, this is huge play.

 

On Solana, Circle's USDC carries a market cap of around $8.1 billion, compared to Tether's $3.05 billion. That's a more than 2.6-to-1 advantage for Circle on the chain. In global terms, the picture is reversed: USDT's circulating supply tops $185 billion versus roughly $79 billion for USDC. Tether has always dominated the overall stablecoin market; it just hasn't had much luck on Solana. Until now, maybe.

 

Paolo Ardoino, Tether's CEO, framed the intervention in fairly lofty terms. "Tether's role in the digital assets ecosystem is to provide a platform for individuals and institutions alike that is ready to step forward to help the industry in the moment of darkness," he said in a statement.

 

That said, analysts aren't exactly reading this as pure altruism. As one observer put it, the Drift exploit was, for Tether, an "operational window" to buy market share at a moment of maximum vulnerability. The funding structure itself reinforces this reading: repayments to affected users are tied to future trading activity on the relaunched platform, meaning Tether's money goes further the more Drift succeeds as a USDT venue.

 

Circle Gets the Blame, Tether Gets the Spoils

Tether saw the opening and definitely took it. Circle finds itself under intense scrutiny in the days following the Drift hack, after attackers transferred more than $230 million in USDC from Solana to Ethereum using Circle's own cross-chain transfer protocol. Critics, including on-chain investigator ZachXBT, pointed out that Circle had a window of at least six hours to blacklist the relevant wallets and freeze the funds, and did nothing.

 

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire later defended the company's position, saying that USDC wallets are only frozen when directed by law enforcement or courts, not unilaterally during active hacks. The argument tracks with Circle's broader regulatory strategy, which prioritizes institutional alignment and compliance above all else. Whether that's the right call is debatable. What's less debatable is that a class action lawsuit has reportedly been filed against Circle in the aftermath, alleging the firm knowingly allowed attackers linked to North Korea to offload stolen funds through its own infrastructure.

 

Tether, by contrast, has a long history of freezing funds tied to hacks and illicit activity quickly, often without waiting for court orders. That operational difference has real consequences for platforms that care about protecting users when things go wrong.

 

How Drift Gets Back on Its Feet

The April 1 attack was a serious one. Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis estimates losses at approximately $285 million. According to Drift's own postmortem, the attackers used a combination of social engineering and a technical method known as "durable-nonce pre-signing" to obtain privileged administrative access, a scheme that reportedly began at least six months before the exploit was executed. From there, the attackers deposited worthless CVT tokens as fake collateral, then withdrew real USDC, SOL, and ETH.

 

Drift's TVL, which was above $550 million before the attack, has since fallen to around $242 million. The protocol's recovery framework targets $295.7 million in outstanding user losses, a figure that actually exceeds its current TVL. To bridge that gap, the plan leans on future trading fee revenue flowing into a dedicated recovery pool. Users will also receive a separate recovery token representing their claim on that pool, transferable and distinct from the DRIFT governance token.

 

The market responded well to the announcement: DRIFT token surged roughly 22%, climbing from $0.045 to $0.055 on the day, after having fallen as much as 30% in the immediate aftermath of the exploit.

 

A Stablecoin War Fought One Bailout at a Time

The Drift deal lands at a time when competition in the stablecoin market is genuinely heating up. USDC has made real headway in institutional and DeFi use cases over the past couple of years, partly by positioning itself as the "clean" option for regulated environments. Circle's IPO plans have only reinforced that narrative.

 

Tether still holds a commanding global lead, but the gap in on-chain activity has been narrowing. Coindesk data shows USDC transaction volumes outpaced USDT's in recent months, and Circle's market share has been expanding. This makes Solana, where USDC has been strongest, a particularly important front in what is increasingly looking like a full-scale stablecoin war.

 

Whether the Drift bailout actually converts into lasting USDT dominance on Solana remains to be seen. Relaunch is contingent on Drift completing two independent security audits, and rebuilding trust with users after a $285 million heist takes more than a well-funded recovery plan. But Tether, at least for now, holds a key piece of Solana's DeFi architecture. And it didn't exactly have to do much begging to get it.

 

 

Circle is pushing even further into the global payments infrastructure. On April 8, the company officially launched CPN Managed Payments, a fully managed stablecoin settlement product built on top of its Circle Payments Network that lets banks, fintechs, and payment processors tap into USDC rails without ever touching digital assets themselves. Yes, you heard that correctly, they never even have to touch USDC.

 

The solution handles everything on the backend, including USDC minting and burning, payment orchestration, compliance controls, and blockchain infrastructure, so that partner institutions can operate entirely in fiat. In other words, a payment provider signs up, connects once, and Circle does the rest.

 

That is a huge shift in how stablecoin adoption typically works. Until now, most institutions eyeing blockchain-based settlement had to deal with the full stack: custody arrangements, internal compliance buildout, licensing questions, and the operational headaches that come with managing digital assets on a balance sheet. CPN Managed Payments is designed to help institutions overcome those barriers, including digital asset custody, licensing requirements, compliance complexity, and operational risk.

 

"With CPN Managed Payments, we're simplifying how institutions adopt and scale stablecoin payments," said Nikhil Chandhok, Circle's Chief Product and Technology Officer. "By combining issuance, liquidity, compliance, and programmable infrastructure into a unified solution, we are enabling financial institutions to embed stablecoin settlement into their existing payment stacks with enterprise-grade reliability and operational readiness."

 

The launch is an extension of CPN, which Circle first announced in April 2025 and brought live the following month. CPN was designed to connect banks, neo-banks, payment service providers, virtual asset service providers, and digital wallets to enable real-time settlement of cross-border payments using regulated stablecoins. Cross-border payments can still take longer than one business day to settle and cost more than 6%, according to the World Bank, disproportionately impacting emerging markets.

 

The underlying mechanics are worth understanding. On the sending side, an originating financial institution handles customer onboarding, KYC, and fiat-to-USDC conversion. On the receiving side, a beneficiary institution receives USDC and converts it to local currency for payout. Circle sits in the middle as network operator but is not holding or moving the funds itself, acting instead as a coordination layer between member institutions. With the managed payments product, Circle now absorbs even more of that operational complexity on behalf of its partners.

 

USDC's market cap currently sits at around $74.8 billion, and Circle reported Q4 2025 revenue of $770 million, 77% better than the same period the prior year. The company has been aggressively expanding its licensing footprint globally and is now leaning into that compliance infrastructure as a competitive moat rather than just a cost center. Circle said that USDC has supported over $70 trillion in "cumulative onchain settlement," with nearly $12 trillion of that amount coming in Q4 2025 alone.

 

CPN Managed Payments is built on Circle's existing infrastructure, which covers payouts across more than 20 blockchains and domestic payment rails, with connectivity to CPN fiat payout corridors worldwide. The platform is also composable, meaning institutions can start fully managed and gradually take on more of the stack themselves as their internal capabilities develop.

 

Launch partners include Veem, along with other global payment service providers. Earlier CPN adopters included Alfred Pay, which is using the network to enable stablecoin-to-fiat offramps via PIX and SPEI; Tazapay, supporting compliant fiat disbursements into Hong Kong; and RedotPay, initiating USDC-based payments into Brazil.

 

The competitive picture is getting crowded. PayPal has had its own stablecoin product on the market for over a year, and Ripple's RLUSD has been gaining ground in cross-border settlement use cases, particularly in corridors where USDC's footprint has been slower to develop. But Circle's bet with CPN Managed Payments is distinct: rather than compete stablecoin-to-stablecoin, it is trying to become the rails that other institutions use, regardless of which digital dollar eventually wins.

 

Circle is currently focusing on serving organizations transacting in high-value, underserved global trade corridors, with plans to explore expansion into Nigeria, the EU, UK, Colombia, India, the UAE, China, Turkey, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Argentina.

 

For traditional finance players who have wanted stablecoin efficiency without the crypto balance sheet exposure, the product is about as clean an entry point as the market has offered. 

 

The internet has always had a payments problem. HTTP moved data. SMTP moved email. But money? Money got stuck behind proprietary rails, bank integrations, and checkout forms that were never really built for a digital-first world. That gap, which the industry has spent decades papering over with varying degrees of success, is now the target of something bigger than any one company: the x402 Foundation, launched today under the Linux Foundation, with Coinbase, Cloudflare, and Stripe among its founding backers.

 

The announcement, timed to April 2 (a nod to HTTP status code 402, "Payment Required"), marks a formal step toward turning x402 into a neutral, community-governed standard. And the list of companies signing on makes it hard to dismiss as just another crypto lab experiment. Adyen, Amazon Web Services, American Express, Ant International, Google, Mastercard, Microsoft, Shopify, the Solana Foundation, Visa, and more than a dozen other names from across fintech, big tech, and crypto all attached their names to the effort.

 

What x402 Actually Does

The protocol is simple. When a client tries to access a resource gated behind x402, the server responds with the 402 Payment Required status code along with machine-readable payment instructions: amount, asset, network, recipient. The client then attaches a payment authorization header and resends the request. A facilitator verifies the payment and settles the transaction. That is the whole flow. No accounts, no subscriptions, no API keys, no manual billing cycles.

 

Coinbase launched the first version in May 2025, quietly, with the 402 HTTP status code having sat largely dormant since it was first defined in the early 1990s. Within months the protocol had processed over 100 million payments across APIs, apps, and AI agents. By December, the team shipped x402 V2, which added multi-chain support by default, cleaner separation between clients, servers, and facilitators, and the architectural foundations for session management and identity. The reference SDKs are available across TypeScript, Go, and Python.

 

Transaction costs sit near zero, with Coinbase's facilitator offering the first 1,000 transactions per month free and charging $0.001 per transaction beyond that. For micropayments, the kind worth a fraction of a cent that credit card networks have never handled well, that matters enormously. The protocol currently runs on Base, Polygon, and Solana, with stablecoins like USDC as the primary settlement layer. Future versions are designed to accommodate traditional rails as well, including ACH, SEPA, and card networks, using the same payment model.

 

Why This Moment, Why This Structure

The timing is not accidental. The push into autonomous AI agents across the industry has exposed a glaring problem: agents need to pay for things. When an AI assistant browses the web to buy something, or a trading bot needs a real-time data feed, or a robot needs to procure compute on the fly, making a human stop and authorize each payment defeats the entire point. What the industry needs is a payment primitive that works the way HTTP works: in the background, at machine speed, without friction.

 

"The internet was built on open protocols," said Jim Zemlin, CEO of the Linux Foundation, in comments tied to the launch. The Foundation's involvement is a deliberate move to ensure no single company ends up owning the payment layer of the agentic web. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince echoed that logic in September when the two companies announced their intent to launch the Foundation together: the internet's core protocols have always been governed independently, and x402 should be no different.

 

That governance structure is a meaningful part of the pitch. The x402 Foundation is framed explicitly as stewardship, not ownership. No single company controls the standard. The membership body is open to developers, startups, and enterprises. Cloudflare's alignment with the effort also signals that x402 is being treated as infrastructure at the edge level, not just a crypto developer toy. Integrating x402 into Cloudflare's edge compute and CDN stack means payment requests can slot into everyday web workflows the same way SSL became table stakes for basic security.

 

The Bigger Picture

Early use cases already live in production. Hyperbolic, an AI compute marketplace, uses x402 for AI agents paying per GPU inference session rather than committing to a monthly subscription. OpenMind has robots autonomously procuring compute and data. Cal.com embeds x402 for paid human interactions directly inside scheduling workflows. The scope of what a frictionless pay-per-use primitive unlocks is genuinely wide, and that is before the protocol adds broader identity support and more payment backends.

 

There are real risks worth naming. The protocol currently leans heavily on Coinbase's own facilitator infrastructure, which handles verification and settlement and is, today, the most mature option in the ecosystem. Cloudflare and others reduce protocol-level concentration, but early traffic still routes largely through Coinbase's stack. The facilitator is free now. That may not last indefinitely once network effects solidify. And unlike credit card networks, x402 has no network-level payment reversal. Refunds require a compensating transfer from the merchant, making the protocol closer to cash than to a reversible card transaction. For high-frequency API calls that is a feature. For consumer flows that expect buyer protections, it is a liability worth monitoring.

 

What x402 has going for it, beyond the technical architecture, is the coalition. Visa and Mastercard alongside the Solana Foundation and Polygon Labs in the same founding member list is unusual. Google Cloud's managing director for Web3 and Digital Assets called the shift toward agentic commerce a fundamental reason Google is joining, describing the need for cloud infrastructure that is as open as the protocols it supports. Whether that breadth translates into real interoperability or remains aspirational will be one of the defining stories to watch as the Foundation gets off the ground. If x402 does become foundational plumbing, the question will be who benefits most from having been at the table when the standard was written.

 

Onchain sleuth ZachXBT has accused stablecoin issuer Circle of improperly freezing 16 hot crypto wallets. The freeze is reportedly linked to an ongoing civil case in the United States, but ZachXBT said the company failed to conduct adequate due diligence before taking action.

 

 

“An analyst with basic tools could have identified, within minutes, that these were operational business wallets from the thousands of transactions they process,” he said.

 

According to ZachXBT, the wallets were used for business purposes. “I reviewed the onchain activity, and the exchanges, casinos, and forex businesses do not appear to be related to one another,” he added.

 

The crypto investigator also criticized the judicial process that approved the freeze, calling it the “most incompetent” he has seen in more than five years of work in the field.

 

“The NY civil case is sealed and they have provided absolutely ZERO basis to freeze all of these business addresses. [...] The expert witness is liable. The judge is liable. Circle is liable,” Zach said. “This is what happens when you outsource your freezing decisions to literally any random federal judge instead of having a process,” he added.

 

Following the callout by the on-chain investigator, Circle reportedly unfroze one of 16 wallets. According to Zach, the wallet with the address "0x61f…e543," which holds 130,966 USDC and is linked to Goated, has been unfrozen. He expects more wallets to be unlocked soon.

 

The Crypto Community Reacted

The crypto community reacted with outrage, with many criticizing centralized stablecoins. “This is your 10th reminder that centrally issued stablecoins are not actually yours. They can be frozen, unlike cash,” said Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius Labs.

 

“I still find it hard to believe that token issuers can 'freeze' coins on EVM shitchains and call it a 'normal' feature. The CBDC is already here, and it's called USDC,” said Francis Pouliot, CEO of crypto platform Bull Bitcoin.

 

Circle’s History With Freezes

Like many centralized stablecoin issuers, Circle has a history of freezing crypto assets. In May 2025, it froze approximately $57 million in USDC linked to the memecoin project LIBRA, as well as 2,997,180 USDC held in an Ethereum address flagged for suspicious activity.

 

Most of these freezes were legally justified and are part of Circle's efforts to curb money laundering and other illicit activities on the blockchain. 

 

However, some critics have raised concerns about centralization, noting that centralized stablecoin issuers can freeze users' crypto assets at their discretion, a clear departure from the user control promised by blockchain technology.

 

 

Coinbase and mortgage lender Better Home & Finance have announced a new product that lets prospective buyers use Bitcoin or USDC as collateral on a Fannie Mae-backed mortgage, without ever having to liquidate their holdings. It is, by most measures, the clearest sign yet that digital assets are finding their way into the mainstream and will be used as the machinery of American homeownership.

 

How It Will Work

Borrowers transfer their digital assets from Coinbase into a custody wallet held by Better, retaining legal ownership of the crypto throughout the life of the loan. The collateral sits there as a pledge, not a payment. For holders of USDC, Circle's dollar-pegged stablecoin, the arrangement even lets them keep earning yield on their holdings while those same assets secure the mortgage.

 

The rate premium is real, though. Borrowers should expect to pay 0.5 to 1.5 percentage points above a standard 30-year fixed loan, depending on their overall profile. Whether that spread feels worth it depends largely on how much a borrower values not triggering a taxable event by selling appreciated crypto positions. For long-term Bitcoin holders sitting on significant gains, the math can work out in their favor.

 

One of the more notable design choices here is the absence of margin calls. In most crypto lending products, a sharp price drop can trigger forced liquidation of collateral. This product is built differently. If Bitcoin falls 40% in a month, the terms of the mortgage do not change and no additional collateral is required. Liquidation risk only enters the picture after a 60-day payment delinquency, putting the structure firmly in line with how conventional mortgages work rather than how crypto lending typically operates. This matters a great deal for borrowers who have been burned by or are skeptical of DeFi-style collateral arrangements.

 

How Did We Get Here?

In June 2025, Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte issued a directive ordering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare proposals for counting cryptocurrency as an asset in mortgage risk assessments, without requiring borrowers to first convert those holdings into dollars. The directive was framed explicitly around President Trump's stated goal of making the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Pulte's letter specified that only crypto held on U.S.-regulated centralized exchanges would qualify, and he called for risk mitigants including valuation adjustments to account for volatility.

 

Until now, Fannie and Freddie's guidelines required that any cryptocurrency a borrower wanted to use for a down payment, closing costs, or reserves had to be liquidated into U.S. dollars first. The Coinbase-Better announcement marks the first time that framework has been operationalized into an actual product backed by Fannie Mae. Whether lenders across the broader market follow suit remains to be seen, as industry experts have cautioned that adoption will be gradual. Individual lenders may impose their own overlays, and aggregators who purchase loans will need to get comfortable with the structure before it becomes truly mainstream.

 

Coinbase and Better are not alone in seeing opportunity here. Newrez, one of the largest mortgage servicers in the country with roughly $778 billion in assets under management, announced late last year that it was assessing Bitcoin and Ethereum for mortgage qualification purposes. Bob Johnson, head of originations at Newrez, described the FHFA directive as a meaningful signal from Washington that the capital markets infrastructure underpinning a significant share of U.S. mortgage origination is open for change.

 

Bitcoin ETFs have surpassed $100 billion in assets under management since receiving SEC approval in early 2024, and a growing cohort of American households hold meaningful digital asset positions. For those buyers, particularly younger, crypto-native professionals who have built wealth in digital rather than traditional asset classes, the old requirement to sell before buying a home was a genuine friction point. This product is a direct answer to that segment.

 

Questions Sill Remain

Not everyone is convinced the move is without risk to the broader housing system. A group of Democratic senators wrote to Director Pulte last July raising concerns about attaching a notoriously volatile asset class to one of the most systemically important markets in the U.S. economy. The letter questioned the transparency of the decision-making process and asked for details on how downside risks would be managed. Those concerns have not disappeared just because a product has launched.

 

Experts in the mortgage industry have echoed a degree of caution. Some analysts expect lenders to apply heavy discounts to crypto valuations for qualifying purposes, potentially treating holdings at 10% or less of market value, and to require that assets be seasoned on regulated exchanges for a defined period. The operational side of verifying, valuing, and monitoring digital assets in a mortgage context is still being developed, and few lenders have the infrastructure in place today to do it at scale.

 

Whatever the short-term practical limitations, the symbolic weight of Fannie Mae's involvement should not be understated. The government-sponsored enterprise, which has been under federal conservatorship since 2008 and underpins a substantial portion of American mortgage finance, is now part of a product that treats Bitcoin and USDC as legitimate collateral.

 

The irony here is hard to ignore. The 2008 financial collapse, driven largely by reckless mortgage-backed securities dealings, was the very event that inspired Satoshi Nakamoto to write the Bitcoin whitepaper. That invention, born as a rejection of and answer to the broken banking system, will now be used to back the same financial instrument that helped trigger the crisis. Life, as they say, comes full circle.

 

Resolv Labs’ stablecoin, USR, has lost its U.S. dollar peg following an exploit of the token’s contract that allowed attackers to mint millions of tokens.

 

The exploit, which occurred on March 22, 2026, resulted in the creation of 50 million unbacked USR tokens, prompting the team to temporarily pause the protocol’s functions to prevent “further malicious actions.”

 

 

According to YieldsandMore, which first reported the story, the attack began with a 100,000 USDC deposit by the attackers, ultimately causing USR to lose its dollar peg and fall to $0.01.

 

After minting the USR tokens, the attackers converted them into wrapped USR (wstUSR) to access deeper liquidity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). This allowed them to offload large amounts of wstUSR more gradually, reducing the risk of an immediate price crash of USR.

 

The next phase of the attack involved dumping and selling wstUSR tokens across multiple platforms, including KyberSwap and Velora. Using this method, the attackers swapped wstUSR for USDt and USDC, which were then aggressively converted into Ether (ETH).

 

Although the attack was first made public by the crypto research and analysis group YieldsandMore, the Resolv team was only able to pause the protocol three hours later.

 

“It took ResolvLabs three hours to pause its protocol. Roughly one hour of that delay came from the gap between submitting the multisig transaction and collecting the four required signatures to execute it,” YieldsandMore wrote on X.

 

While 50 million tokens were initially minted by the attackers, blockchain security company PeckShield reported that an additional 30 million USR tokens were later minted, bringing the total to approximately 80 million.

 

 

Price Action of USR in the Aftermath of the Exploit

The minting and dumping of USR tokens triggered a severe depeg, sending its price from $1 to roughly $0.02 to $0.05 within minutes, a decline of about 95 to 97%.

 

Although it briefly rebounded to between $0.14 and $0.20, USR is currently trading at $0.2773, according to data from CoinMarketCap at the time of publication. 

 

The USR depeg ranks among the most severe in recent history, second only to the collapse of Terra's TerraUSD (UST) in 2022, which fell from $1 to $0.02 and lost 98% of its value. Iron Finance also had its IRON stablecoin lose its dollar peg, dropping from $1 to about $0.05.