The UK government has imposed a moratorium, or temporary ban, on cryptocurrency donations in politics following findings from an independent review. 

 

Commissioned by UK Secretary of State Steve Reed in December 2025, the Rycroft review, led by former Permanent Secretary Philip Rycroft, investigated “foreign financial influence and interference in UK politics.”

 

The findings of the review, published on Wednesday, highlighted how active hostile states are attempting to influence UK democracy and identified political crypto donations as a vulnerability. Since such donations are difficult to trace, the review recommended a temporary ban or moratorium on political crypto contributions.

 

Following a recommendation from the Rycroft Review for a ban on political crypto donations, the UK government has announced a moratorium on political cryptocurrency contributions. The ban, which takes immediate effect, was confirmed by Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

 

"I can tell the House we will act decisively to protect our democracy. That will include a moratorium on all political donations made through cryptocurrencies," Starmer said during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday.

 

Prime Minister’s Questions. Image credit: Youtube

 

In a statement on its official website, the UK government said British citizens living abroad will face an annual cap of £100,000 on donations and on regulated transactions, including loans. The government said the measure aims to "protect the country's democracy from the scourge of foreign actors and financial influence."

 

Next Stage: Bill Moves Toward Law

Although the ban is already in effect as a temporary measure, the Representation of the People Act will need to be amended for it to become permanent law. The Representation of the People Act is a UK law that governs how elections are conducted, who can vote, and how political parties operate, including rules on donations and campaign financing.

 

Once the amended bill passes both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, it will be sent to King Charles III for royal assent. On becoming a law, political entities will have a 30 day deadline to return any political crypto donations received during the moratorium period.

 

"Once the legislation comes into force, political parties and regulated entities, such as candidates and MPs, will have 30 days to return any unlawful donations received in the interim, after which enforcement action may be taken, the UK government wrote on its website."

 

This moratorium comes amid calls from top politicians in the country who have long sought a ban on political crypto donations, notable among whom are Parliament member Rushanara Ali, Matt Western, Labour MP and committee chair, among others.

 

 

Balancer Labs, the core team behind the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Balancer, has announced plans to wind down after a $116 million exploit that occurred in November.

 

The decision, according to CEO Marcus Hardt, was driven by the impact of the hack. Despite continuing to generate revenue, Balancer Labs’ economic model was no longer sustainable in the aftermath of the hack.

 

“We were spending too much to attract liquidity relative to what that liquidity was actually generating in revenue,” Hardt said. “We were diluting BAL holders to sustain a system that, in my view, was no longer serving the protocol well. At some point, you have to be honest about that.”

 

With Balancer Labs winding down its operations, the protocol is expected to be managed by the Balancer Foundation and its decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), an approach supported by co-founders Hardt and Fernando Martinelli. 

 

DAO members have been asked to vote on a proposal to restructure the protocol and its tokenomics. If approved, BAL emissions will end, all fees will be routed to the treasury, and the protocol’s share of swap fees will be reduced. The team size will also be cut.

 

So, while Balancer Labs, the core development team, is winding down, the protocol will continue operating under new management with a leaner structure.

 

 

The Balancer Protocol Exploit

On November 3, 2025, Balancer Protocol suffered a smart contract exploit targeting its V2 composable stable pools, resulting in the theft of significant amounts of cryptocurrency.

 

Although Balancer had a permission system in place, a bug in the smart contract allowed the attacker to bypass these controls. The attacker exploited the vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the protocol’s shared vault system, enabling them to drain assets from multiple liquidity pools across different blockchains simultaneously.

 

The hack had a severe impact on Balancer, causing its total value locked (TVL) to drop from about $775 million to $258 million within days of the exploit, according to a report. Its native token, BAL, also fell by about 30%.

 

The shutdown of the Balancer Labs team comes weeks after crypto aggregator Step Finance announced its own shutdown following a January 31 hack that reportedly led to losses of between $26 million and $40 million from the protocol’s treasury.

 

Bunni, a decentralized liquidity protocol built on Uniswap V4, also shut down around October last year after suffering a hack that resulted in losses of about $8.4 million.

 

 

Resolv Labs’ stablecoin, USR, has lost its U.S. dollar peg following an exploit of the token’s contract that allowed attackers to mint millions of tokens.

 

The exploit, which occurred on March 22, 2026, resulted in the creation of 50 million unbacked USR tokens, prompting the team to temporarily pause the protocol’s functions to prevent “further malicious actions.”

 

 

According to YieldsandMore, which first reported the story, the attack began with a 100,000 USDC deposit by the attackers, ultimately causing USR to lose its dollar peg and fall to $0.01.

 

After minting the USR tokens, the attackers converted them into wrapped USR (wstUSR) to access deeper liquidity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). This allowed them to offload large amounts of wstUSR more gradually, reducing the risk of an immediate price crash of USR.

 

The next phase of the attack involved dumping and selling wstUSR tokens across multiple platforms, including KyberSwap and Velora. Using this method, the attackers swapped wstUSR for USDt and USDC, which were then aggressively converted into Ether (ETH).

 

Although the attack was first made public by the crypto research and analysis group YieldsandMore, the Resolv team was only able to pause the protocol three hours later.

 

“It took ResolvLabs three hours to pause its protocol. Roughly one hour of that delay came from the gap between submitting the multisig transaction and collecting the four required signatures to execute it,” YieldsandMore wrote on X.

 

While 50 million tokens were initially minted by the attackers, blockchain security company PeckShield reported that an additional 30 million USR tokens were later minted, bringing the total to approximately 80 million.

 

 

Price Action of USR in the Aftermath of the Exploit

The minting and dumping of USR tokens triggered a severe depeg, sending its price from $1 to roughly $0.02 to $0.05 within minutes, a decline of about 95 to 97%.

 

Although it briefly rebounded to between $0.14 and $0.20, USR is currently trading at $0.2773, according to data from CoinMarketCap at the time of publication. 

 

The USR depeg ranks among the most severe in recent history, second only to the collapse of Terra's TerraUSD (UST) in 2022, which fell from $1 to $0.02 and lost 98% of its value. Iron Finance also had its IRON stablecoin lose its dollar peg, dropping from $1 to about $0.05.

 

 

For most of the past decade, the conversation around artificial intelligence and crypto stayed largely theoretical. Two industries, both moving fast, both attracting enormous capital, but mostly running on parallel tracks. That started to change in late 2024, and by early 2026 the overlap had become hard to ignore. MoonPay, the crypto payments firm that built its name on fiat-to-crypto on-ramps, is now positioning itself as the financial infrastructure layer for a future where AI agents don't just analyze markets but actively participate in them.

 

On February 24, the company officially launched MoonPay Agents, a non-custodial software layer built on top of MoonPay CLI, its developer-focused command-line interface. The product gives autonomous AI systems the ability to generate wallets, fund them through fiat on-ramps or crypto transfers, execute on-chain trades, and convert holdings back to fiat, all without requiring a human to approve each individual step. Less than three weeks later, on March 13, MoonPay followed up with a second announcement: a deep integration with Ledger, the hardware wallet maker, designed to let users sign off on AI-initiated transactions directly from a physical device.

 

MoonPay CEO Ivan Soto-Wright put it bluntly in the launch statement: "AI agents can reason, but they cannot act economically without capital infrastructure." The line is a bit pithy, but it captures the actual gap. Building a bot that can identify an arbitrage opportunity across three chains is a solved problem in 2026. Building one that can act on that opportunity, fund itself, execute the trade, and off-ramp the proceeds into a bank account without exposing private keys or requiring a human babysitter is not.

 

MoonPay Agents is designed to close that gap. The setup is relatively straightforward: a developer installs MoonPay CLI, a user completes a one-time KYC verification, funds a wallet, and grants the agent permission to transact within defined parameters. After that initial handshake, the agent can operate independently. Wallets are non-custodial and stored locally on the user's device using OS keychain encryption. Private keys never leave the machine. Spending limits and pre-execution transaction simulations serve as guardrails against runaway agents doing something unintended.

 

 

What Is Moonpay Agents?

The product ships with 54 tools across 17 categories, covering most of what a developer building a financially active agent would actually need. That includes real-time cross-chain swaps, recurring buy schedules, portfolio tracking, token discovery and analysis, multi-chain deposit links with automatic stablecoin conversion, fiat funding via virtual accounts that accept bank transfers, Apple Pay, Venmo, and PayPal, and the ability to off-ramp back to traditional currencies from the terminal.

 

Multi-chain coverage at launch spans Ethereum, Solana, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BNB Chain, Avalanche, TRON, and Bitcoin. Over 100 tokens are supported. Developers can also extend the platform with custom skills. The system is compatible with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and can be accessed via the CLI, a local Model Context Protocol server, or a web chat interface.

 

One detail that has caught the attention of developers in the agentic AI space is native x402 support. The x402 protocol, introduced by Coinbase in May 2025, revives the long-dormant HTTP 402 status code to enable machine-to-machine payments using stablecoins, with no API keys or subscriptions required. An agent simply pays for a resource or service at the time of access. MoonPay's inclusion of x402 compatibility positions MoonPay Agents within the emerging standard that Stripe, QuickNode (which extended x402 support across more than 80 chains), and a growing number of infrastructure providers have rallied around.

 

MoonPay Agents is not architected for one or two bots. The infrastructure is built to support thousands, eventually millions, of agents running concurrently across use cases that range from trading and portfolio management to gaming economies, commerce automation, and corporate treasury operations.

 

 

The Ledger Integration

MoonPay's solution was to bring Ledger into the loop. By integrating Ledger's Device Management Kit into the CLI wallet for MoonPay Agents, the company now allows every AI-generated transaction to be routed through a physical hardware device for approval. The agent constructs and proposes the transaction. The user confirms it on the Ledger. Private keys never touch the software layer at any point.

 

MoonPay says this makes the CLI wallet the first agent-focused wallet to support Ledger's secure signing through the Device Management Kit. Soto-Wright put the strategic framing plainly: "Autonomous agents will manage trillions in digital assets. But autonomy without security is reckless. We built MoonPay Agents with Ledger so intelligence can scale without surrendering control. The agent executes. The human stays in the loop."

 

Ledger's chief experience officer, Ian Rogers, acknowledged that the partnership reflects a real shift in what wallet infrastructure needs to support. "There is a new wave of CLI and agent-centric wallets emerging," he said, "and these will need Ledger security as a feature, too." It is a meaningful endorsement from a company whose entire value proposition is built on the premise that hardware is the only storage you can actually trust.

 

The model that results from the integration is structurally similar to two-factor authentication in traditional finance: the AI handles the analytical and execution work, but physical confirmation is required to release funds. Even a fully compromised software environment cannot move money without the physical Ledger device and its PIN.

 

 

What This Means for Developers

For developers building agents that need to touch money, the practical implications of MoonPay Agents are fairly direct. The product abstracts away most of the hard parts: custody, key management, fiat connectivity, cross-chain routing, compliance. A single CLI install and a one-time user verification is genuinely all that stands between a developer and an agent that can fund itself, trade across chains, and off-ramp back to a bank account.

 

The ability to add custom skills also matters. MoonPay Agents ships with 54 tools across 17 categories, but the open extension model means developers can build on top of the existing toolkit rather than working around its edges. That kind of extensibility is usually what determines whether a platform becomes a default or a footnote.

 

What remains to be seen is how the ecosystem grows around it. MoonPay has the infrastructure and the user base. The question now is whether developers building the next generation of agentic applications pick MoonPay Agents as their default financial layer, or whether a competitor, or a collection of open standards, fills that space instead.

 

 

A Structural Shift, Not a Feature Launch

It is worth stepping back from the product details for a moment to consider what MoonPay is actually doing here. This is not a company adding AI features to an existing payments product. It is a payments company making a deliberate bet that the financial system is about to acquire a new class of participant, one that is not human, that will require infrastructure designed specifically for machine-speed, machine-scale capital movement, and that will need to be anchored to compliant fiat rails if it is ever going to interact with the broader economy.

 

That bet is not obviously wrong. Stablecoin volumes are growing at rates that would have seemed implausible even two years ago. Agent tokens and AI-driven trading systems are proliferating faster than most infrastructure providers anticipated. The convergence of AI and crypto, long discussed in the abstract, is becoming a concrete engineering problem that real companies are being paid to solve.

 

MoonPay's move is a claim that it has already built most of what that future requires, and that the work of this moment is connecting those existing rails to the autonomous systems that will run on them. It is an ambitious claim. The next 18 months will do a lot to determine whether it holds up.

 

 

 

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has warned crypto users about a fake token on the Tron blockchain impersonating the agency.

 

In a post on its New York X account, the FBI said some Tron users have received messages from scammers posing as the agency, asking them to complete an anti-money laundering verification to avoid having their assets frozen and falsely claiming their wallets are under investigation.

 

The FBI cautioned against falling for such scams. “If you receive a token from an account with the details below, do not provide any identifying information to any website associated with the token,” the agency said.

 

Users who have already sent their personal information to the scammers were urged to file a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center.

 

 

Inside Crypto Phishing Scams

The launch of the fake FBI token is one of several crypto phishing scams that have emerged in recent months. These scams often involve impersonating recognized government agencies, companies, or public figures, tricking users into giving up their personal credentials.

 

According to Scam Sniffer, about 106,106 victims were affected by crypto phishing scams in 2025, resulting in losses of approximately $83.85 million. 

 

Although this represents a significant drop compared to the $494 million in losses and 332,000 victims recorded the previous year, phishing remains widely used by attackers, especially with the growing use of AI-generated phishing campaigns.

 

 

FBI Created Fake Cryptocurrency Token

In 2024, the FBI created a fake artificial intelligence–related token, called NexFundAI, an Ethereum-based cryptocurrency designed to catch scammers.

 

The NexFundAI token was part of Operation “Token Mirrors,” launched to identify and expose fraudulent market makers and manipulators, including those involved in wash trading and pump-and-dump schemes.

 

The operation was successful, as it led to the arrest of more than 18 individuals and the seizure of several million dollars from the suspects. 

 

 

A Bitcoin wallet holding 2,100 BTC (worth over $147 million) became active after more than 13 years of dormancy.

 

The wallet, identified by the address 1NB3ZXx…BQB6ZX, moved 0.00079 BTC (approximately $55.71) at 11:27 a.m. UTC on Friday, a tiny fraction of its total holdings. According to data from Bitinfocharts, the wallet received the 2,100 BTC in a single transaction on July 4, 2012.

 

At the time, Bitcoin was trading at $6.59, valuing the holdings at about $13,839. The wallet’s value has since increased by more than 10,000x, rising to over $147 million today.

 

Image credit: Bitinfocharts

 

This move did not go unnoticed in the crypto community, with many applauding the whale’s patience and others calling it one of the most effective trading strategies.

 

“13.7 years of silence… just to move $56. That’s not a sell signal — it’s a reminder of what conviction looks like in Bitcoin. From $6 to $75,000, the biggest returns didn’t come from trading… they came from time,” said Andy Wang, CEO of crypto platform HashWhale.

 

This isn’t the first Bitcoin whale wallet to be reactivated this year. In January, a 13-year-old dormant wallet moved 909 BTC, worth about $85 million, to a new address.

 

About a week ago, another Bitcoin whale that had been dormant for roughly two years transferred 343 BTC, worth approximately $23.85 million, between Binance and Cobo.

 

 

Bitcoin’s Price Action This Month

Despite experiencing significant volatility this month, Bitcoin has posted a net positive month-to-date gain.

 

Starting the month at around $67,000, Bitcoin dipped to $65,303 before surging to $74,000 days later, and was trading at $69,927 as of March 10. It also reached a peak of $75,988, with some analysts speculating about a potential breakout above $80,000.

 

According to data from CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin is currently trading at around $69,807, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $39 billion and a market capitalization of nearly $1.396 trillion.

 

 

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dropped its two-year case against Nader Al-Naji, founder of the blockchain-based social media platform BitClout.

 

The stipulation of dismissal was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and, according to the US regulator, the dismissal was based on a reassessment of evidentiary records.

 

 

Since the dismissal was issued with prejudice, the SEC will not be able to file the same charges against Al-Naji or any of the relief defendants named in the case, including his wife, mother, or any companies associated with him.

 

However, the SEC cautioned against treating the dismissal as a precedent for other cases. “The Commission’s decision to exercise its discretion and seek dismissal of this litigation is based on the particular facts and circumstances of this case and does not necessarily reflect its position on any other case,” it said.

 

Reacting to the dismissal, Nader Al-Naji, founder of BitClout, described the initial lawsuit as unreasonable. “In the coming days and weeks, I will be hopping on some podcasts to tell the whole story,” Al-Naji said.

 

 

Why the Sec Filed a Lawsuit Against Al-Naji

On July 30, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a civil lawsuit against Al-Naji. The regulator alleged multiple complaints against him, including offering unregistered securities. According to the SEC, Al-Naji failed to register BTCLT, BitClout’s native token, which he sold to investors, raising over $257 million from its sales.

 

The SEC also accused Al-Naji of fraud and misrepresenting the use of investor funds, claiming he spent more than $7 million on luxury properties in Beverly Hills and extravagant cash gifts for family members.

 

In addition to the SEC’s civil case, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleged that Al-Naji committed wire fraud by misleading investors about the use of their funds, leading to his arrest in July 2024. However, these criminal charges were later dropped.

 

 

An Increase in the Number of Case Dismissals by the SEC

The dismissal of the BitClout case is one of several recent SEC case dismissals, particularly since the start of the Trump administration.

 

In January 2026, the SEC jointly dismissed its lawsuit against Gemini Trust Company and Gemini Earn. The regulator had initially alleged that Gemini Earn offered unregistered securities but dropped the charges without imposing penalties.

 

In 2025, the SEC voluntarily dismissed its case against the blockchain platform Dragoncoin, which it had accused of making misrepresentations. The case was closed with prejudice, and no penalties were imposed.

 

 

Former U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson has called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme, claiming it has far less value than gold and even Pokémon cards, which he said are more widely recognized.

 

 

 

In a recent Daily Mail article, former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson called Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme with no real value, saying it relied on a “supply of new and credulous investors.” He also shared the story of a friend who lost about $26,000 in a crypto investment scam.

 

Johnson shared a story about a retired man from a village in Oxfordshire who initially handed over £500 (about $661) to someone who promised to double the money through Bitcoin investments. Johnson said the man went on to invest £20,000 (around $26,450) over three and a half years but ultimately received nothing in return.

 

The former prime minister also questioned the credibility of Bitcoin, calling it “a string of numbers stored in a series of computers.” “Who can we turn to if someone decrypts the crypto?” Johnson asked. “There’s no one except Nakamoto, who might be nothing more than Pikachu or Charmander.”

 

Since the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, lacked institutional backing, Johnson questioned Bitcoin’s credibility as a tradable asset. According to Johnson, Pokémon cards, which fascinated children thirty years ago and still do today, are a more tradable asset than Bitcoin.

 

“These curious little Japanese cartoon beasties hold the same fascination for five-year-olds as they did 30 years ago. The kids are obsessed with them. They boast and squabble about them,” Boris said.

 

“Even if you remain pretty impervious to the charm of Pikachu, you can just about see why a decades-old Pikachu card is still a tradeable asset,” he added.

 

 

The Crypto Community Responded

While many social media users have ridiculed Boris’ understanding of cryptocurrency, some have offered clearer explanations of why Bitcoin cannot be called a Ponzi scheme.

 

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, also sought to clarify the issue.

 

“Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme. A Ponzi requires a central operator promising returns and paying early investors with funds from later ones,” Saylor wrote on X.

 

“Bitcoin has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand,” he added.

 

 

 

A crypto user has lost millions of dollars to slippage and Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bots while performing a swap involving the decentralized finance protocol Aave.

 

The user whose Binance wallet was funded attempted to swap $50.4 million in USDT for the AAVE token using the decentralized exchange aggregator CoW Protocol and the decentralized exchange SushiSwap.

 

Since DEXs like SushiSwap use automated market makers (AMMs) that set token prices based on trading activity, the user was warned about the potential for high slippage.

 

“Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox,” Stani Kulechov, Aave’s founder, said.

 

The user ignored the warning and proceeded with the swap, receiving only 327 AAVE tokens from the $50.4 million transaction. Due to extreme slippage, the user effectively paid about $154,000 per AAVE, far above the market price of $114.

 

“The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return,” Stani added. 

 

Reacting to the incident, CoW Protocol, the DEX aggregator used for the swap, said on its X account, “Despite clear warnings that showed the user they would lose nearly all of the value of their transaction, and despite needing to explicitly opt into the trade after seeing the warning, the user chose to proceed with their swap.”

 

 

The MEV Bot Sandwich Attack

In addition to the massive slippage loss, the user also lost nearly $10 million to MEV bots. Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bots monitor pending blockchain transactions and exploit them for profit. 

 

These bots typically execute a sandwich attack: they buy a token before a user places a large order, driving up the token’s price. Once the user buys at this inflated price, the bots immediately sell, profiting from the transaction.

 

MEV bots, spotting the pending USDt-to-AAVE swap, borrowed $29 million in wrapped ether (WETH) from Morph, used the funds to buy AAVE on Bancor, and then sold the AAVE tokens at an inflated price on Sushiswap before the swap was executed, netting $9.9 million in profit.

 

 

Compensation Plans

To compensate the user for the huge loss, Stani Kulechov, Aave’s founder, said Aave would return $600,000 in transaction fees collected from the transaction. CoW Protocol also said it would refund any fees collected from the transaction back to the user.

 

 

 

Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) pulled off a real power play on Wall Street Thursday, with shares jumping roughly 25% after the company announced it had locked in $125 million in new institutional commitments from a lineup that includes Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, and Payward, the parent company of crypto exchange Kraken.

 

The raise was led by Bitmine, which committed $75 million, with ARK Invest pledging at least $25 million and Payward rounding out the headline trio with another $25 million of its own. The full investor roster behind ORBS reads like a who's who of the crypto world: Coinfund, Pantera Capital, GSR, FalconX, Discovery Capital Management, and the World Foundation are all listed as backers.

 

But the capital raise wasn't even the most eyebrow-raising piece of news in Thursday's announcement. Eightco simultaneously disclosed it had already closed initial strategic investments of $50 million into OpenAI and $25 million into MrBeast and Beast Industries. 

 

The OpenAI investment, worth approximately $52.5 million in economic interests in the company's equity, closed on March 6, just days before this announcement.

 

 

To understand how we got here, we kind of have to dive a bit deeper. Eightco has had one of the stranger corporate transformations of recent years. The Pennsylvania-based company pivoted from inventory management to cryptocurrencies and is currently developing a universal framework for digital identity and authentication. Not too long ago, its main business was making cardboard boxes through a subsidiary called Ferguson Containers.

 

Now, the company's identity is built around Worldcoin (WLD), the biometric-based digital identity project co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. As of March 5, 2026, Eightco's treasury holdings included 277,222,975 WLD tokens, 11,068 ETH, and $82 million in cash. That WLD position, the company says, represents nearly 10% of the token's circulating supply, making ORBS the largest public market holder of Worldcoin on any exchange.

 

The company continues to hold Worldcoin and Ethereum as a long-term believer in the world's second-most valuable cryptocurrency, and frames its Worldcoin stake as foundational to a "proof of humanity" authentication layer it's building out.

 

The vision, as ORBS tells it, is to combine Worldcoin's biometric identity infrastructure with OpenAI's foundational models to create something at the intersection of AI verification, blockchain rails, and mass consumer reach. And it seems that it's clearly a compelling enough pitch to draw in some serious institutional names.

Who's Backing It, and Why

Tom Lee, Chairman of Bitmine, is joining Eightco's Board of Directors, while Brett Winton, Chief Futurist at ARK Invest, will serve as an advisor to the board.

 

Lee's involvement through Bitmine is notable. Bitmine itself has been on an aggressive crypto treasury strategy of its own, positioning itself as the leading Ethereum treasury company in public markets. Bitmine has combined crypto, cash, and "moonshot" holdings ranging well into the billions, and adding Eightco to that ecosystem tightens the connection between the two companies considerably. Lee getting a board seat means this isn't a passive financial bet.

 

His take on the investment was direct. Bitmine sees Eightco sitting at the center of some of the most important future needs and developments in AI, with what Lee described as tremendous synergy between Proof of Human via Worldcoin, OpenAI's foundational models, and the reach of the world's biggest content creator in MrBeast.

 

ARK Invest's Cathie Wood weighed in too, describing ORBS as taking on a unique initiative at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and creator-driven platforms.

 

Kraken's Arjun Sethi was perhaps the most philosophical about the whole thing. The Payward co-CEO framed it around power-law dynamics, suggesting that a small number of platforms tend to capture a disproportionate share of value in technological revolutions, and that ORBS is trying to position itself at the convergence of AI, cryptographic infrastructure, and global digital distribution.

MrBeast and the Distribution Play

The $25 million bet on Beast Industries deserves its own look. On March 10, Eightco invested approximately $25 million in shares of Beast Industries, with $7 million of that amount structured as committed capital that may be funded within 60 days in exchange for additional stock.

 

Beast Industries is the broader enterprise behind YouTube megastar Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast. The company spans entertainment, consumer products, and CPG, with the snack brand Feastables among its faster-growing launches. MrBeast's YouTube channel has over 450 million subscribers and generates more than 5 billion monthly views across all channels.

 

For a blockchain infrastructure play trying to build out digital identity at scale, having a meaningful stake in the world's most-subscribed YouTube channel is an unusual but not entirely illogical move. Distribution is distribution, and Eightco seems to be betting that the future of human authentication online will require massive consumer reach to actually work.

 

Taken together, Eightco is making a bold argument that the convergence of AI identity verification, blockchain infrastructure, and mass consumer distribution represents a huge opportunity, and that a small public company out of Pennsylvania is somehow positioned to sit at the center of it.

 

Whether the OpenAI stake, the MrBeast bet, the Worldcoin treasury, and the Ethereum holdings actually compound into something concrete is still up in the air. The risk disclosures in ORBS's own SEC filings acknowledge this as well, flagging the company's lack of control over private companies where it holds minority stakes, and the ongoing challenges of maintaining Nasdaq listing compliance while burning cash.

 

But the investor lineup announced today isn't made up of amateurs. Pantera, Brevan Howard, Coinfund, and ARK all know what they're doing, and they all decided this particular combination of bets was worth backing.

 

 

An X user with the username "Sillytuna" has reportedly lost $24 million in Aave Ethereum USDC (aEthUSDC) in an attack that involved a combination of violence, sexual assault, weapons, and threats to life.

 

 

"Bruised, held off while I could, but can't do that much with axes over your hands and feet," Sillytuna wrote. The user further stated that he was, at this point, done with crypto. In his words, "And now... definitely out of crypto ****ers."

 

While the matter has already been reported to law enforcement, no official statement has been issued by the authorities. However, the X user has announced a 10% bounty for whoever helps recover the stolen funds.

 

 

 

How the Crypto Community Reacted

Shortly after the news went viral, the crypto community reacted with mixed feelings, with many commiserating with the user over their loss. Some also raised awareness about the deplorable state of security in the United Kingdom. Apparently, the victim is a UK resident.

 

 

Amid the sympathy from the global crypto community, some, however, doubted the authenticity of the victim's story.

 

According to YokaiCapital, an X user, the victim had not posted anything about crypto before. He also alleges that the victim's account appears to have been bought recently.

 

"He will probably shill the coin at some point or say that he will take donations from the coin," YokaiCapital went on to write. 

 

However, the victim has denied allegations that he intentionally wanted to trend and claims the stolen funds were long-term holdings.

 

 

How the Attackers Moved the Stolen Funds

Tracking the stolen funds, blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence said that the attackers moved the funds across Layer 2 networks, Bitcoin, and Monero, obviously to evade trail.

 

 

 

Roughly $20 million of the stolen funds were stored in two Ethereum addresses as DAI, a stablecoin on the Ethereum network, while $2.48 million was bridged to USDC on Arbitrum.

 

Arkham reported that the attackers sent $2.47 million to Hyperliquid through 19 separate Wagyu accounts, which were used to convert the funds to Monero (XMR).

 

The attackers also bridged $1.1 million to the Bitcoin blockchain using LiFi, noting that 0.5 BTC was deposited into a mixing service, Arkham added.

 

 

 

A Coinbase shareholder has filed a derivative lawsuit against several top executives and board members of the crypto exchange, alleging compliance and disclosure failures by the company’s leadership. 

 

On Tuesday, Kevin Meehan, one of Coinbase’s shareholders, filed a complaint in a U.S. district court in New Jersey. The court filing cited several of Coinbase’s top directors, including CEO Brian Armstrong, co-founder Fred Ehrsam, Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, and Chief Financial Officer Alesia Haas, among other executives.

 

Image credit: PACER

 

 

According to the filing, the plaintiff accused the defendants of making false and misleading statements between April 2021, when the exchange became a publicly traded company, and June 2023. The complainant alleged that a compliance failure by the exchange's leadership exposed the company to several stringent regulatory actions.

 

On behalf of Coinbase, the complainant, Kevin, is seeking damages, requesting that the court implement corporate governance reforms, and requesting recovery of any profits the exchange's leadership may have obtained during the period when the exchange faced these compliance cases.

 

However, since this is a shareholder derivative lawsuit, any financial recovery from Coinbase's directors will go to Coinbase rather than directly to the shareholders.

 

 

Coinbase Battle With Compliance

Over the past few years, Coinbase has faced several legal and compliance challenges, paying millions of dollars in damages and penalties. 

 

In January 2023, the New York State Department of Financial Services sued the exchange for major failures in its Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program. The regulator accused Coinbase of having weak Know-Your-Customer (KYC) checks and failing to properly review suspicious transactions.

 

As part of the settlement, Coinbase agreed to pay $100 million: $50 million in penalties and $50 million to improve its compliance checks and systems.

 

In June 2023, Coinbase was hit with a $5 million penalty by the New Jersey Bureau of Securities. The regulator accused the exchange of allowing the trading of unregistered securities on its platform, prompting several other states to impose restrictions on its staking services at the time.

 

Coinbase has also faced legal challenges from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In 2023, the SEC filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging it operated an unregistered exchange. Following the announcement, Coinbase’s stock dropped sharply, falling from over $60 to under $50 within minutes of the news breaking.