World Liberty Financial, the crypto project behind the USD1 stablecoin, has announced a partnership with Spacecoin, a blockchain-native satellite internet company, to bring crypto payments directly into satellite connectivity networks. The goal is simple in theory but ambitious in execution, combine decentralized finance with decentralized internet access, starting in regions where both are limited or nonexistent.

 

The partnership signals a growing shift in crypto away from purely digital experiments and toward physical infrastructure, particularly in space.

 

 

What the Partnership Actually Does

At the core of the deal is the integration of WLFI’s USD1 stablecoin into Spacecoin’s satellite network. The two projects completed a strategic token swap, tying their ecosystems together and aligning incentives long term.

 

USD1 is intended to act as the settlement layer for payments and services across Spacecoin’s network. In practice, that means users who connect to Spacecoin’s satellite internet could also transact financially using a dollar-pegged digital asset, without relying on traditional banks or local payment rails.

 

This is not just about paying for internet access. The broader vision is to enable commerce, remittances, and digital services in areas where stable connectivity and reliable currencies are both hard to come by.

 

Who Is Spacecoin

Spacecoin is part of a growing wave of DePIN projects, or decentralized physical infrastructure networks. Instead of building centralized telecom systems, Spacecoin is deploying low-Earth orbit satellites that interact with blockchain infrastructure on the ground. The company recently launched three satellites into orbit as part of the company's place to exand global internet access.

 

According to Spacecoin, satellite-based connectivity requires an integrated financial layer. The company sees USD1 as a way to allow new users to transact digitally as soon as they gain internet access. While it remains early stage compared to incumbents like Starlink, Spacecoin is positioning itself as a permissionless alternative, one that treats connectivity as an open network rather than a closed service.

 

Why WLFI Is Betting on Satellites

World Liberty Financial has drawn attention in part due to its political associations, but strategically the project is trying to do something familiar in crypto, expand the reach of a stablecoin beyond exchanges and trading desks.

 

USD1 is designed to be a transactional stablecoin, not just a store of value. WLFI has been exploring debit cards, points programs, and onchain incentives. Plugging USD1 into a satellite network takes that logic further, pushing the asset into environments where traditional finance struggles to operate.

 

For WLFI, satellites offer a way to bypass fragile local infrastructure and leap directly into global usage.

 

The Bigger Picture

This deal sits at the intersection of several fast-moving trends.

 

Satellite internet is expanding rapidly as launch costs fall and demand for global connectivity rises. At the same time, stablecoins are quietly becoming one of crypto’s most widely used tools, especially in emerging markets where currency volatility is a daily concern.

 

By combining the two, WLFI and Spacecoin are effectively testing whether crypto can function as a default financial layer in places that skipped earlier generations of banking and broadband.

 

It is a bold idea, but also a risky one.

 

The Challenges Ahead

Satellite-based payments are not trivial. Latency, reliability, and security all become more complex when transactions are routed through orbit. Regulatory uncertainty is another major factor, especially when stablecoins cross borders without clear oversight.

 

There is also competition. Spacecoin is entering a crowded satellite market dominated by well-funded players with existing user bases and proven performance. Convincing users, developers, and governments to adopt a decentralized alternative will take time.

 

And then there is execution. Many crypto-infrastructure partnerships sound compelling on paper but struggle to move from announcement to real-world usage.

 

Why This Still Matters

Even with those risks, the partnership stands out because it points toward a version of crypto that is less abstract and more physical.

 

Instead of arguing about narratives and token prices, this model asks a practical question. What happens when internet access and money are delivered together, from space, without intermediaries?

 

If WLFI and Spacecoin can make even a fraction of that vision work, it could reshape how people think about both connectivity and finance in the most underserved parts of the world.

 

Crypto has always promised to be global. This time, it is trying to prove it literally.

 

 

Washington’s long-running effort to write clear rules for crypto is moving forward, but not cleanly.

 

The U.S. Senate has released updated language for a long-anticipated crypto market structure bill, yet deep disagreements remain between lawmakers, committees, and the industry itself. Two separate Senate committees are now pushing different versions of the legislation, and the gaps between them are proving harder to close than many expected.

 

At stake is nothing less than who regulates crypto in the United States, how stablecoins are allowed to operate, and whether decentralized finance can exist without being squeezed into a framework built for Wall Street.

 

A Bill That Is Really Two Bills

The market structure effort is split between the Senate Agriculture Committee and the Senate Banking Committee, each advancing its own vision of how digital assets should be governed.

 

The Agriculture Committee’s draft leans heavily toward expanding the authority of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Under this approach, most major cryptocurrencies would be treated as digital commodities, placing them largely outside the Securities and Exchange Commission’s reach.

 

The Banking Committee’s version, often referred to as the CLARITY Act, takes a more cautious and detailed approach. It attempts to draw clearer legal lines between what counts as a security and what does not, while preserving a significant role for the SEC in overseeing parts of the crypto market.

 

Both sides say they want regulatory certainty. The problem is they disagree on what that certainty should look like.

 

The CFTC Versus SEC Fight Is Still the Core Issue

At the heart of the debate is a familiar Washington turf war.

 

Supporters of the Agriculture Committee draft argue that the CFTC is better suited to oversee crypto markets, particularly spot trading for assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. They point to the agency’s lighter touch, its experience with commodities, and its closer alignment with how crypto markets actually function.

 

The Banking Committee sees things differently. Its members are more focused on investor protection and worry that shifting too much power to the CFTC could weaken oversight. Their draft tries to preserve the SEC’s role, especially when tokens are issued in ways that resemble traditional securities offerings.

 

Neither side appears ready to fully back down, which is why the Senate still has not settled on a single unified bill.

 

Stablecoins Become a Flashpoint

Stablecoins, once seen as the least controversial corner of crypto, are now one of the most contentious parts of the bill.

 

One major sticking point is a proposed restriction on stablecoin rewards or yield. Under the Banking Committee’s draft, issuers would face limits on paying users simply for holding stablecoins.

 

Crypto companies argue this would kneecap a core feature of digital dollars and make them less competitive with traditional financial products. Some in the industry say the provision feels less like consumer protection and more like an attempt to shield banks from competition.

 

Lawmakers defending the restriction say they are trying to prevent stablecoins from morphing into unregulated interest-bearing products that could pose risks to consumers and the broader financial system.

 

The disagreement has become symbolic of a larger divide over how much freedom crypto should have to innovate inside a regulated framework.

 

DeFi Still Does Not Fit Neatly Anywhere

Decentralized finance remains one of the hardest issues for lawmakers to solve.

 

Both Senate drafts struggle with how to treat protocols that do not have a central company, executive team, or traditional governance structure. Some lawmakers want stronger rules to prevent DeFi platforms from being used for illicit activity. Others worry that applying centralized compliance models to decentralized systems will effectively ban them.

 

For now, DeFi remains an unresolved problem in the bill, with language that critics say is either too vague or too aggressive, depending on who you ask.

 

Coinbase Draws a Line in the Sand

Industry frustration boiled over when Coinbase publicly withdrew its support for the Banking Committee’s draft.

 

The exchange called the proposal worse than the status quo, pointing to its treatment of DeFi, stablecoin yield restrictions, and limits on tokenized equities. Coinbase’s criticism carried weight in Washington and contributed to the Banking Committee delaying its planned markup hearing.

 

That delay rippled through the market, briefly weighing on crypto prices before sentiment stabilized.

 

Timing Gets Complicated

The Agriculture Committee is moving ahead more quickly, scheduling a markup hearing to debate amendments and advance its version of the bill.

 

The Banking Committee, meanwhile, has pushed its timeline back as lawmakers juggle other priorities, including housing legislation. That has pushed any meaningful progress into late winter or early spring at the earliest.

 

The longer the process drags on, the more uncertain the path becomes. Election season is approaching, and legislative calendars tend to tighten as political pressure increases.

 

A Broader Regulatory Backdrop Is Already in Place

The market structure debate is happening against a backdrop of recent regulatory action.

 

Congress has already passed stablecoin legislation that sets rules around reserves, disclosures, and audits. Earlier House efforts, including last year’s market structure bill, also laid groundwork by outlining how digital assets might be classified under federal law.

 

What the Senate is trying to do now is connect those pieces into a comprehensive framework. That has proven easier said than done.

 

The Next Test

The next major test will be whether the Agriculture and Banking Committees can reconcile their differences or whether one version gains enough momentum to dominate the process.

 

Expect heavy lobbying from crypto companies, financial institutions, and trade groups, particularly around stablecoin yield, DeFi protections, and agency jurisdiction.

 

For now, the Senate’s crypto market structure bill remains a work in progress, ambitious in scope, politically fragile, and still very much unsettled.

 

One thing is clear. The era of regulatory ambiguity is ending, even if the final shape of crypto regulation in the U.S. is still being fought over line by line.

 

Bermuda is taking a swing that very few governments have even talked about seriously, let alone tried.

 

The island nation says it wants to move large parts of its economy directly onto public blockchains, using stablecoins and crypto infrastructure instead of the traditional banking and payments stack. To do that, it has teamed up with Coinbase and Circle, two of the most established companies in the industry.

 

This is not a pilot tucked away in a sandbox. The ambition here is much bigger. Bermuda wants onchain rails to support real economic activity, the kind that happens every day, not just crypto trading.

 

Whether that actually works is still an open question. But the fact that a government is trying at all is notable.

 

How Bermuda Got Here

Bermuda did not wake up one morning and decide to put its economy onchain.

 

For years, the island has been quietly building a reputation as a place where crypto companies can operate without constantly guessing how regulators will react. The rules are clear. Licensing exists. Enforcement is predictable. That alone puts Bermuda ahead of many much larger jurisdictions.

 

Coinbase and Circle both set up regulated operations there long before this announcement. In some ways, this new initiative looks like the next logical step rather than a sudden leap.

 

Officials describe it as modernization. Fewer intermediaries, faster settlement, and lower costs. In plain terms, they think the financial plumbing can work better.

 

What the Crypto Companies Actually Do

Coinbase is mostly about infrastructure here.

 

Think wallets, compliance tooling, and the systems that make it possible for people and businesses to interact with blockchains without needing to understand every technical detail. Coinbase has spent years building that stack, and Bermuda wants to plug into it.

 

Circle’s role is more straightforward. It issues USDC, the dollar backed stablecoin that would act as the money moving through this onchain system. The appeal is obvious. Prices do not swing wildly, and payments can move quickly without touching legacy rails.

 

Together, they provide something that looks less like an experiment and more like a functioning financial system, at least on paper.

 

Regulation Is the Quiet Enabler

None of this happens without regulation that is already in place.

 

Bermuda’s digital asset laws spell out what exchanges, issuers, and custodians can and cannot do. That sounds boring, but it matters. It gives companies confidence to build, and it gives the government leverage to enforce standards.

 

In a global crypto landscape still shaped by uncertainty and court cases, that kind of clarity stands out.

 

For Bermuda, regulation is not about keeping crypto at arm’s length. It is about making it usable at scale.

 

This Is Not The First Test

There have already been small but meaningful trials.

 

Last year, local residents were given stablecoins to spend at participating merchants during a digital finance event. People bought meals, paid for services, and moved money using wallets and QR codes. It was not perfect, but it worked well enough to get attention.

 

Merchants got paid quickly. Users did not have to think too hard about what was happening under the hood. For policymakers, that mattered more than transaction volume.

 

Those early trials helped turn a concept into something more concrete.

 

Bermuda’s approach is anchored in what The Hon. E. David Burt, JP, MP, Premier of Bermuda describes as a collaborative model between government, regulator, and industry designed to enable responsible innovation at scale.

 

“Bermuda has always believed that responsible innovation is best achieved through partnership between government, regulators, and industry, with the support of Circle and Coinbase, two of the world’s most trusted digital finance companies, we are accelerating our vision to enable digital finance at the national level. This initiative is about creating opportunity, lowering costs, and ensuring Bermudians benefit from the future of finance.”

 

Payments Are Really the Point

Strip away the buzzwords and this comes down to payments.

 

Small economies often pay more to move money, especially across borders. Stablecoins promise faster settlement and fewer fees, which can make a real difference for local businesses and government operations alike.

 

If onchain payments become normal in Bermuda, that alone would be a meaningful shift. Everything else, tokenization, smart contracts, broader digital asset services, comes later.

 

Why People Outside Bermuda Care

Bermuda is small, and that is part of the advantage.

 

Rolling out new systems is easier when you are not dealing with hundreds of millions of people and layers of bureaucracy. But success on a small island still sends a signal.

 

If this works, it shows that stablecoins can operate inside a regulated national framework without blowing things up. It also raises uncomfortable questions for countries that are still debating whether crypto belongs anywhere near their financial systems.

 

Other governments are paying attention, even if they are not saying much yet.

 

The Hard Parts Are Still Ahead

Adoption is not automatic.

 

People need to trust the tools they are using. Businesses need to see clear benefits. Regulators need to keep up as technology and global standards change. Any one of those things can slow momentum.

 

There is also the question of what happens when onchain systems meet real economic stress, not just controlled pilots and conferences.

 

That test has not happened yet.

 

What This Really Represents

For most of crypto’s history, the industry has talked about changing finance while mostly building parallel systems that sit off to the side.

 

Bermuda is trying something different. It is asking whether blockchain infrastructure can simply become part of how an economy runs, quietly and without much fanfare.

 

It might work. It might not.

 

Either way, it pushes the conversation forward in a way few announcements do.

Ripple and LMAX Push Institutional Stablecoin Adoption

 

 

Ripple’s reported deal with LMAX Group is not really about another exchange listing or a short-term liquidity boost. It is about where stablecoins are finally starting to show up inside institutional finance, and what that shift says about the next phase of crypto market structure.

The headline is simple enough. Ripple and LMAX have struck a $150 million agreement that brings Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin, RLUSD, deeper into LMAX’s institutional trading venues. The more interesting part is what comes next: RLUSD is expected to be usable as collateral, margin, and settlement capital by professional trading firms.

That may not sound dramatic at first glance, but inside institutional markets, it is a big deal.

 

From parking asset to working capital

For years, stablecoins have mostly played a supporting role. They were the thing traders sat in between positions or used to move money between exchanges when banks were closed. Retail users cared about convenience and price stability. Institutions cared about something else entirely: whether a stablecoin could actually replace cash in live trading workflows.

Using a stablecoin as collateral changes the conversation. Suddenly, that token is not just sitting idle. It is supporting leveraged positions, absorbing margin requirements, and moving around trading venues without waiting for bank wires or settlement windows.

LMAX is a meaningful place for that shift to happen. The firm has built its reputation on institutional-grade execution in FX and digital assets, serving banks, brokers, hedge funds, and proprietary trading firms. If RLUSD is accepted inside that ecosystem as usable collateral, it moves closer to being treated as functional cash, not just crypto-native liquidity.

 

Why LMAX matters more than a typical exchange

This is not a retail exchange partnership. LMAX’s client base is made up of firms that already manage risk, margin, and balance sheets for a living. These are the players who care about haircut schedules, collateral eligibility, operational reliability, and compliance comfort.

If those firms are willing to post RLUSD as collateral, it suggests confidence not only in the token’s peg, but also in the issuer behind it. That trust is harder to earn than a listing, and far more valuable once it exists.

It also reflects a broader institutional reality. Firms want capital that moves around the clock, across venues, and across asset classes. Cash tied to banking hours and regional settlement systems increasingly feels like a constraint.

 

Ripple’s stablecoin strategy is becoming clearer

RLUSD is not a side project for Ripple. The company has been positioning it as an enterprise-grade stablecoin, backed by segregated reserves and supported by regular attestations. It runs on both XRP Ledger and Ethereum, and Ripple has been explicit about pushing it into real financial workflows rather than letting it exist as a passive asset.

That push has shown up in a few places already. RLUSD has been integrated into Ripple’s payments stack. It has been listed on institutional venues. And now, with LMAX, it is moving into collateral use cases.

Seen together, these steps suggest Ripple is trying to build something closer to an institutional cash layer than a retail stablecoin brand.

 

The collateral flywheel institutions care about

For professional trading firms, collateral is where the real leverage sits. If a stablecoin can be posted as margin, it becomes part of the firm’s core capital stack. That unlocks capital efficiency, especially for firms operating across time zones and asset classes.

Once a stablecoin clears that bar, it can expand into settlement, netting, and treasury operations. It can move between venues over the weekend. It can reduce idle balances. It can simplify how firms manage liquidity across crypto and traditional markets.

This is also why Ripple’s broader institutional moves matter. The company has been building out infrastructure that connects stablecoins, custody, prime brokerage, and payments. The LMAX deal fits neatly into that picture.

 

A crowded market with a narrow institutional lane

RLUSD is entering a stablecoin market dominated by incumbents with massive scale. But market cap is not the only metric that matters in institutional finance. Acceptance as collateral, integration into regulated venues, and operational trust often matter more than raw supply.

Institutions do not ask which stablecoin is biggest. They ask which one their venue will accept, which one clears risk checks, and which one will still work under stress.

Ripple is clearly aiming at that narrow lane, where trust, compliance, and plumbing matter more than retail mindshare.

 

What still needs to be proven

There are still open questions. The exact scope of RLUSD’s collateral eligibility at LMAX matters. Haircuts, product coverage, and custody integration will determine how widely it is actually used.

There is also the question of scale. True institutional adoption shows up in volume, not announcements. It shows up during volatile markets, when liquidity and redemptions are tested.

And as always, jurisdiction matters. Stablecoin availability and usage depend on regulatory boundaries that vary by region and client type.

 

Why this matters now

The broader takeaway is that stablecoins are quietly moving from the edges of crypto markets toward the center of institutional finance. Not through hype cycles, but through plumbing.

If RLUSD becomes a routine piece of collateral inside venues like LMAX, it will be less about Ripple winning a headline and more about stablecoins winning a role they have been chasing for years.

 

In that sense, this deal is less about a token and more about a shift. Stablecoins are no longer just crypto’s cash. They are starting to look like finance’s.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Coinbase Draws a Line in the Sand on Market Structure Bill

 

Coinbase is stepping back from Washington’s biggest crypto push yet.

Just days before a crucial vote in the Senate Banking Committee, the largest US crypto exchange says it will not support the Senate’s sweeping crypto market structure bill in its current form. The message from Coinbase CEO, Brian Armstrong, is blunt. Regulatory clarity matters, but not at any cost.

The move highlights a growing divide between lawmakers eager to lock in federal rules and an industry increasingly wary of legislation that could reshape its business in unintended ways.

 

A Bill Meant to End the Gray Area

The Senate bill, months in the making, is designed to finally spell out how digital assets are regulated in the United States. At its core, the proposal tries to answer long-standing questions about which crypto assets fall under securities law, which should be treated as commodities, and how oversight should be split between regulators.

For years, crypto companies have complained that the lack of clear rules has pushed innovation offshore and left firms vulnerable to enforcement actions after the fact. On paper, this bill is supposed to fix that.

But as the text has taken shape, it has also picked up provisions that some in the industry see as deal-breakers.

 

Stablecoin Rewards Become the Flashpoint

For Coinbase, the biggest problem sits with stablecoins.

The draft legislation includes language that could sharply limit or effectively eliminate rewards paid to users who hold stablecoins on platforms like Coinbase. These rewards are not technically interest paid by issuers, but incentives offered by exchanges and intermediaries. Still, critics argue they look and feel a lot like bank deposits, without bank-style regulation.

Traditional banking groups have pushed hard for tighter rules here. Their concern is straightforward. If consumers can earn yield on dollar-pegged crypto tokens outside the banking system, deposits could drain from insured banks, particularly smaller ones.

Coinbase sees it differently. Stablecoin rewards have become a meaningful part of how crypto platforms compete and how users engage with dollar-based crypto products. Cutting them off, the company argues, would harm consumers and hand an advantage back to traditional finance.

In private and public conversations, Coinbase executives have made it clear that they are unwilling to back a bill that undercuts what they view as a legitimate and already regulated product.

"After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48 hours, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written,” Armstrong said. "This version would be materially worse than the current status quo, we'd rather have no bill than a bad bill."

 

Why This Matters Beyond Coinbase

Coinbase’s stance carries weight. It is one of the most politically active crypto companies in Washington and often serves as a bellwether for broader industry sentiment.

If Coinbase is out, others may quietly follow.

That raises the risk that lawmakers end up with a bill that lacks meaningful industry buy-in, or worse, one that passes but leaves key players unhappy enough to challenge or work around it.

Some firms are already exploring alternatives, including banking charters or trust licenses, as a hedge against restrictive federal rules. Others may simply slow US expansion and look overseas.

 

A Narrow Path Forward in the Senate

The timing is not ideal.

The Senate Banking Committee is expected to vote on the bill imminently, but support remains fragile. Lawmakers are divided not just on stablecoins, but also on how to handle decentralized finance, custody rules, and even ethics provisions tied to political exposure to crypto.

Add in election-year politics, and the window for compromise looks tight.

If the bill stalls or fails in committee, there is a real chance it gets pushed into the next Congress. That would mean at least another year, and likely more, of regulatory uncertainty.

 

No Law vs a Bad Law

Behind the scenes, a familiar argument is playing out.

Some in Washington believe that imperfect legislation is better than none at all. The industry, scarred by years of enforcement-first regulation, is no longer convinced.

Coinbase’s decision reflects a growing view among crypto companies that a flawed law could do more long-term damage than continued ambiguity. Once rules are written into statute, they are far harder to undo.

For now, the standoff continues.

 

Whether lawmakers soften the bill to keep major players on board or push ahead regardless may determine not just the fate of this legislation, but the shape of US crypto regulation for years to come.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Bakkt’s Stablecoin Bet Sparks Stock Surge

 

Bakkt (NYSE: BKKT) shares jumped sharply this week after the company announced plans to acquire stablecoin payments infrastructure firm Distributed Technologies Research Ltd., or DTR. The rally says as much about what investors want Bakkt to become as it does about the deal itself.

The all-stock acquisition is the clearest signal yet that Bakkt is no longer trying to be a broad crypto platform. Instead, it is leaning into a narrower, and arguably more defensible, role as a regulated financial infrastructure company built around stablecoin settlement and payments.

Markets liked the pivot. Bakkt stock closed the day up 18% to $19.21, briefly hitting its highest level in months.

 

What Bakkt is actually buying

DTR is not a consumer brand. It does not run an exchange or wallet that retail users recognize. Instead, it sells payments plumbing. Its technology is designed to move money across borders using stablecoins, while still interfacing with traditional fiat rails.

That positioning matters. Stablecoins have increasingly become the connective tissue between crypto and traditional finance, especially for payments, treasury operations, and international settlement. Owning infrastructure in that layer gives Bakkt something closer to a picks-and-shovels business rather than another trading venue fighting for volume.

For Bakkt, the appeal is straightforward. By bringing stablecoin settlement in-house, the company can reduce reliance on third-party providers, speed up product development, and package a single, integrated stack for institutional clients.

This is not about launching another app. It is about selling rails.

 

The structure of the deal

The transaction is structured as an all-stock acquisition and still needs regulatory and shareholder approval. Based on Bakkt’s disclosures, the deal would result in the issuance of just over nine million new shares, though the final number could change depending on adjustments laid out in prior agreements.

One important detail is governance. DTR is controlled by Akshay Naheta, who has also served as Bakkt’s co-CEO. That relationship introduces obvious questions around conflicts and valuation.

Bakkt appears to have anticipated that scrutiny. The company said the deal was reviewed and approved by an independent special committee of the board. Intercontinental Exchange, which owns a significant stake in Bakkt, has also agreed to vote in favor of the transaction.

Those steps do not eliminate concerns, but they do suggest Bakkt understood the optics and tried to address them early.

 

Why the market reacted so strongly

The stock move was not just about the acquisition. It was about narrative.

Bakkt has spent the past year trying to simplify itself. The company has pulled back from consumer-facing experiments and loyalty products, and has talked more openly about becoming a pure crypto infrastructure provider.

This deal fits that story cleanly.

Stablecoin infrastructure is one of the few areas in crypto where traditional finance firms are quietly increasing engagement. Banks, payment processors, and large enterprises are exploring settlement use cases even as trading volumes fluctuate. Investors see optionality in that shift, especially if regulation continues to clarify rather than clamp down.

There is also a timing element. Bakkt plans to formally change its corporate name later this month and has scheduled an investor day at the New York Stock Exchange in March. Those milestones give the market something to anchor expectations to, and something to trade around.

While the announcement felt abrupt to the market, the relationship between Bakkt and DTR is not new.

The two companies have been commercially aligned for months, with earlier agreements focused on integrating stablecoin payments technology into Bakkt’s platform. From that perspective, the acquisition looks less like a bold leap and more like a second step.

First comes the partnership. Then comes ownership of the core layer once both sides decide the integration matters enough.

 

The risks still on the table

The excitement does not erase real questions.

Dilution is the most immediate one. This is an all-stock deal, and existing shareholders will want clarity on how much value DTR is actually contributing relative to the equity being issued.

Execution risk is another. Payments infrastructure sounds clean on a slide deck, but it is operationally demanding. It requires compliance discipline, bank partnerships, uptime guarantees, and a credible enterprise sales motion. None of that happens automatically.

There is also the issue of revenue concentration. Bakkt has previously lost large clients, and investors will want to know whether this new strategy truly diversifies revenue or simply shifts dependence to a different set of partners.

Those answers are unlikely to come all at once. The March investor day will probably be the first real test of whether Bakkt can explain this strategy in concrete terms.

But, Bakkt’s acquisition of DTR is a bet on where crypto quietly intersects with traditional finance, not where the loudest narratives live. Stablecoins, settlement, and payments are not as flashy as meme coins or ETFs, but they are where real volumes tend to stick.

The stock’s reaction shows investors are willing to believe in that story, at least for now.

 

Whether Bakkt can turn that belief into a durable business will depend on execution in the months ahead.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Trump-Backed World Liberty Financial Rolls Out DeFi Lending Platform

 

World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture tied to President Donald Trump and his family, has crossed another big milestone in its effort to turn a stablecoin and decentralized finance products into a real business. The firm quietly rolled out World Liberty Markets, a new on-chain borrowing and lending platform built around its flagship stablecoin, USD1, and it’s already pulled in tens of millions in assets from early users.

The launch puts World Liberty right into one of the most competitive and risky corners of crypto: decentralized lending. This is where you can earn interest by supplying assets or borrow against your holdings without going through a bank or broker. It’s the plumbing that makes much of DeFi tick, and it’s also where huge liquidations and smart contract exploits have regularly happened. The difference here is political gravity: this project is backed by one of the most polarizing figures in modern American business and politics.

 

What World Liberty Markets Actually Offers

World Liberty Markets isn’t reinventing DeFi. The way it works is familiar if you’ve used other decentralized money markets: you supply assets to earn interest, and you can borrow against collateral you’ve locked up. At launch, supported assets include the company’s own USD1 stablecoin, its governance token WLFI, Ethereum, tokenized Bitcoin, and major stablecoins like USDC and USDT. Once you deposit, you can take a loan out in any of those supported assets based on how much you’ve put up as collateral.

The platform is built with the infrastructure of an existing DeFi protocol called Dolomite, which means World Liberty didn’t have to write an entire lending stack itself. Think of it as a branded front door and dashboard on top of established smart contract mechanics.

In the first week or so, the protocol showed some early traction, with roughly $20 million in supplied assets moving through it. That number is small compared to big DeFi players, but it’s eye-catching because of how recent the launch was and the fact that USD1 supply is growing quickly.

To jump-start liquidity, World Liberty is dangling a very high yield on USD1 deposits, along with a “reward points” program for larger suppliers. World Liberty was announced on X, writing that “WLFI Markets is built to support the future of tokenized finance by providing access to third party and WLFI-branded real-world asset products, supporting new tokenized assets as they launch, and creating deeper and wider access to USD1 across all WLFI applications. It’s designed to provide future access to WLFI’s broader RWA roadmap.”

 

Betting on USD1

Behind all this is USD1, World Liberty’s dollar-pegged stablecoin that has really become the center of the project’s story. Since its debut in early 2025, the coin has ballooned into one of the larger dollar stablecoins by market capitalization, trading alongside names people actually recognize and use every day. It’s backed by cash, short-term Treasuries, and things like dollar deposits through professional custody arrangements, and it aims to be redeemable at parity with the U.S. dollar.

That backing and that promise of redemption put USD1 in the same product category as USDC and USDT, which dominate the stablecoin market. But stablecoins only become useful when there are places for them to be spent, lent, traded or borrowed, and until now USD1 had mostly been used as a tradable asset with some big institutional deals. The lending launch is the first real step toward making it function like money in crypto’s own financial ecosystem.

World Liberty has been aggressively pushing USD1 into major venues, including listings on big exchanges and use as collateral or settlement assets in large trades. That has helped it grow in circulation fast, and have enough liquidity that a lending market now makes sense. Because USD1 is tied so directly to World Liberty’s broader business, how well the lending product does could be a big factor in whether USD1 becomes sticky in the market or remains a speculative novelty.

 

From On-Chain Products to Traditional Finance

This lending rollout comes at a moment when the company is also trying to pull USD1 and its associated services into the regulated financial world. A subsidiary of World Liberty has applied for a national trust bank charter with U.S. regulators. If approved, that would allow the entity to issue and custody stablecoins and digital assets under federal supervision, provide conversion between fiat and stablecoin, and generally operate more like a regulated institution rather than a pure DeFi startup.

That’s a trend you’re seeing across crypto right now. Regulators have started to outline formal frameworks for stablecoins through new legislation aimed at reducing risk and improving disclosure. Projects that tie themselves to those frameworks stand to get easier access to traditional players like banks, exchanges and institutional clients. But it also subjects them to a lot more scrutiny than the wild west of DeFi.

 

Will it succeed?

Here’s the hard truth: decentralized lending markets are notoriously volatile and complex. You can get liquidation events overnight if collateral values tumble. Smart contracts have flaws and exploits. Incentives can attract short-term capital that leaves as soon as the rewards stop. That’s all before you even factor in political risk, regulatory noise, or questions about reserve transparency.

Then there’s the optics of the thing. World Liberty is connected to Donald Trump and his family, who have been publicly associated with this project since the beginning. That’s drawn critics who say there are conflicts of interest embedded in how the venture promotes itself and how big deals get structured. Whether you see that as a feature or a bug, it certainly makes this different from your run-of-the-mill DeFi launch.

For anyone watching this space, the next few months will answer big questions. Will World Liberty Markets continue to draw real deposits once the initial incentives slow down? Will borrowing activity pick up in ways that look organic rather than promotional? Can USD1 maintain its peg and redemption promise under pressure? And how will regulators respond if this trust charter application moves forward?

One thing is clear: if a political figure’s name is going to be tied to a crypto product that interacts with both decentralized users and regulated finance, people in the market will watch every data point, every rate change, every on-chain metric and every regulatory filing with extra attention.

 

Whether it pans out or not will matter to traders, developers, regulators and probably a whole lot of voters too.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Rain’s Big Raise Signals Stablecoins Are Moving Toward Everyday Money

 

Rain just raised $250 million at a valuation just shy of $2 billion, and the size of the round is only part of the story.

What really stands out is what investors are backing. This is not a bet on a new token, a trading platform, or a speculative crypto narrative. It’s a bet that stablecoins are quietly becoming part of the global payments system, and that Rain is positioning itself as one of the companies building the pipes.

For years, stablecoins have been treated as a behind-the-scenes tool for traders and crypto-native users. Rain is trying to move them out of the background and into everyday spending.

 

What Rain Actually Builds

Rain describes itself as stablecoin payments infrastructure, but in practice, it operates more like a full-stack payments company.

The platform allows partners to issue payment cards that are directly connected to stablecoin balances. Those cards can be used anywhere Visa is accepted, which immediately changes how practical stablecoins become for everyday use. From the user’s perspective, it looks and feels like a normal card transaction. Under the hood, the value is settled using stablecoins.

Rain also provides wallets, on- and off-ramps, compliance tooling, and APIs that enterprises can plug into. The goal is to let fintechs, crypto companies, and global platforms launch stablecoin-based payment products without having to build payments infrastructure from scratch.

This setup is already live across more than 150 countries, giving Rain a global footprint that goes well beyond experimental pilots.

 

The Visa Connection Is a Big Part of the Story

One of the reasons Rain stands out is its direct relationship with Visa.

Rain is a Visa principal member, which means it can issue cards directly on the Visa network rather than relying on third-party sponsors. That status is not trivial. It places Rain closer to traditional payments infrastructure while still operating on crypto rails.

Even more important is how settlement works. Rain has been involved in Visa’s move toward stablecoin settlement, allowing card transactions to be settled on chain using stablecoins rather than relying entirely on legacy banking settlement systems. That opens the door to faster settlement cycles, including weekends and holidays, and reduces some of the friction that exists in traditional cross-border payments.

In simple terms, Visa handles the merchant acceptance and point-of-sale experience. Rain handles the stablecoin side of the transaction. Together, they create something that looks familiar to users but operates very differently in the background.

 

Why Investors Are Paying Attention

Rain’s growth metrics look more like a payments company than a typical crypto startup.

The company reports billions of dollars in annualized transaction volume, rapid growth in active cards, and a growing list of enterprise partners using its infrastructure to launch payment programs. That traction helps explain why investors were willing to price the company near $2 billion in this round.

The investor roster also tells a story. The round was led by a major growth firm, with participation from both traditional venture capital and crypto-focused investors. That mix suggests Rain is being viewed as a bridge company, one that sits between fintech and crypto rather than fully in either camp.

The fresh capital is expected to support expansion into new markets, deeper enterprise integrations, and continued investment in compliance and licensing, which remain critical for any payments business operating at global scale.

 

Stablecoins Are Shifting From Trading Tools to Payment Rails

Rain’s rise comes as stablecoins themselves are going through a quiet identity shift.

They still play a major role in trading and on-chain finance, but more companies are now looking at them as a way to move dollar-like value globally with fewer intermediaries. The challenge has always been usability. Most people do not want to think about wallets, gas fees, or blockchain confirmations when they pay for something.

Rain’s model hides that complexity. Users swipe a card. The merchant gets paid. The settlement happens using stablecoins in the background.

That approach aligns with a broader trend across payments and fintech, where blockchain is increasingly treated as infrastructure rather than a product in itself.

 

A Competitive Landscape and Real Execution Risk

None of this guarantees success.

The space is getting crowded. Other crypto infrastructure companies are building similar tools, and large fintechs and banks are experimenting with stablecoin settlement of their own. Regulatory frameworks are evolving, but uncertainty still exists, especially across jurisdictions.

Rain’s challenge now is execution. Scaling payments infrastructure is hard. Doing it globally, while staying compliant and reliable, is even harder. The Series C gives Rain the resources to try, but the next phase will be about proving that stablecoin-powered payments can move from niche programs to mainstream usage.

 

Why This Matters

Rain’s funding round is a signal that the crypto market’s focus is shifting again.

Not toward speculation, but toward utility. Not toward flashy narratives, but toward infrastructure that quietly connects crypto to the real economy.

If stablecoins are going to become everyday money, they will need to work through systems people already trust and understand. Rain’s partnership with Visa, and its push to make stablecoin settlement invisible to users, suggests one possible path forward.

 

That makes this raise more than just another big crypto funding headline. It marks a moment where stablecoins start to look less like an experiment and more like a serious part of the global payments conversation.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

W3i Software Moves to Bring Privacy-First Stablecoins to Midnight With ShieldUSD

 

As the stablecoin market matures, a growing number of projects are focusing on what many see as the next missing piece of on-chain finance: privacy that works alongside regulation, not against it.

That is the direction W3i Software is taking with ShieldUSD, a USD-pegged stablecoin being built for the Midnight Network, a privacy-focused blockchain designed for confidential smart contracts and selective disclosure.

The project aims to deliver a digital dollar that preserves transactional privacy while remaining compatible with compliance and audit requirements, a balance that has proven difficult for most stablecoin models to strike.

 

A Stablecoin Designed for Real-World Privacy

ShieldUSD is being developed by W3i Software in collaboration with Moneta Digital and Norwegian Block Exchange (NBX), combining regulated issuance with Midnight’s privacy-native infrastructure.

Unlike most dollar-backed stablecoins, which expose transaction details publicly on chain, ShieldUSD is designed to allow users to transact confidentially by default. Sensitive information such as counterparties, amounts, or transaction logic can remain private, while still allowing selective disclosure when required for regulatory, legal, or audit purposes.

For many businesses and institutions, that distinction matters. Public blockchains have made settlement faster and more programmable, but the lack of confidentiality has limited adoption in areas like payroll, supplier payments, and enterprise finance. ShieldUSD is explicitly targeting those gaps.

 

Building on Midnight’s Privacy-Native Architecture

ShieldUSD is being built specifically for the Midnight Network, a Layer 1 blockchain developed to support privacy-preserving applications from the ground up. Midnight uses advanced cryptographic techniques to enable confidential transactions and smart contracts without sacrificing verifiability or compliance.

That design allows developers to define what data is private, what is shareable, and with whom. Rather than forcing transparency or secrecy across the board, Midnight supports selective disclosure as a native feature.

ShieldUSD fits naturally into that model. It is intended to function as a settlement asset that can move privately within applications, while still offering the assurances needed by regulators, auditors, and institutional counterparties.

 

W3i’s Experience With Regulated Stablecoins

W3i Software brings prior experience to the project through its work on USDM, a regulated fiat-backed stablecoin in the Cardano ecosystem. That background has shaped ShieldUSD’s approach, particularly around compliance, custody, and reserve transparency.

By pairing that experience with Midnight’s privacy infrastructure, the project aims to show that privacy-preserving finance does not need to exist in tension with regulation. Instead, it can be engineered to support it.

 

A Broader Shift in Stablecoin Design

ShieldUSD arrives amid a broader rethinking of how stablecoins should function as they move deeper into mainstream finance. While transparency has been a core feature of early stablecoins, it has also created unintended consequences, including transaction surveillance and data leakage that make certain use cases impractical.

As AI agents, automated trading systems, and on-chain business logic become more common, privacy is increasingly viewed as a functional requirement rather than a philosophical preference. Midnight’s architecture reflects that shift, positioning privacy as infrastructure rather than an add-on.

ShieldUSD is one of the first stablecoin projects explicitly designed around that premise.

 

Momentum Around the Midnight Ecosystem

The announcement also adds momentum to the Midnight Network more broadly, which has been steadily building toward mainnet readiness with a focus on regulated, privacy-aware applications. The presence of a native, privacy-preserving dollar stablecoin strengthens Midnight’s value proposition as a settlement layer for real-world finance.

While ShieldUSD will still need to build liquidity and adoption in a competitive stablecoin market, its design aligns closely with the needs of enterprises and institutions that have largely remained on the sidelines of public blockchains.

 

What to Expect next

Challenges remain. Privacy-preserving systems are more complex to implement, and regulatory expectations around stablecoins continue to evolve. Still, ShieldUSD represents a clear step toward a more nuanced model of on-chain money, one that treats privacy as compatible with compliance rather than something to be sacrificed.

If successful, ShieldUSD could help demonstrate how stablecoins evolve beyond transparent consumer tokens into serious financial infrastructure, and position Midnight as a network purpose-built for that next phase.

 

For a sector still searching for scalable, privacy-aware settlement tools, ShieldUSD and the Midnight Network offer a direction that many in the industry have been waiting for.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Wyoming Launches the First State-Issued Dollar Stablecoin

 

Wyoming just crossed a line that many in crypto have talked about for years but few thought would happen this soon. The state has announced the official launch its own U.S. dollar stablecoin, live across seven major blockchains, making it the first U.S. state to issue a blockchain-based digital dollar at scale.

The move is not symbolic. It is operational, multi-chain, and designed to be used.

Wyoming just provided one of the strongest validations yet that blockchain technology can be beneficial to the financial system and it is here to stay.

 

What Wyoming actually launched

The new stablecoin, known as the Frontier Stable Token (FRNT), is a dollar-pegged asset issued under Wyoming state authority. Unlike private stablecoins that usually start on a single network, this one launched simultaneously across seven blockchains, including Arbitrum (ARB), Avalanche (AVAX), Base, Ethereum (ETH), Optimism (OP), Polygon (POL), and Solana (SOL) networks.

That decision matters. It signals that Wyoming is not picking winners in the blockchain wars. Instead, it is meeting users and developers where they already are.

The token is backed by U.S. dollar reserves and short-term Treasuries, with a buffer above one hundred percent backing. In plain terms, the state is trying to build something boring, stable, and trustworthy. In stablecoins, that is a feature, not a flaw.

 

Why this is different from every other stablecoin

Until now, every major stablecoin has come from the private sector. USDT, USDC, and others dominate because they were fast, global, and useful, not because they were government-issued.

Wyoming’s move flips that script without turning it into a federal project. This is not a central bank digital currency. It is a state-issued stablecoin built under existing law, with public oversight and clear rules around reserves and transparency.

That distinction is important. It shows there is a middle ground between unregulated private money and a top-down federal digital dollar. Wyoming is effectively saying states can innovate here too.

For crypto, this is a quiet but powerful endorsement. A U.S. state is not just regulating stablecoins. It is issuing one.

 

Why Wyoming was able to do this

This did not come out of nowhere.

Wyoming has spent years building a reputation as the most crypto-forward state in the country. From digital asset custody laws to DAOs and special-purpose depository institutions, the state has consistently taken the approach of learning the technology and writing laws around it, rather than trying to ban it into submission.

The stablecoin project is the logical next step. Instead of just attracting crypto companies, Wyoming is now exporting crypto infrastructure.

It also shows a level of comfort with blockchain that most governments still lack. Launching across multiple chains, managing reserves, and coordinating public and private partners is not trivial. Wyoming treated it like a real financial product, not a pilot experiment.

 

Why this is good for the stablecoin industry

Stablecoins already move more value than most people realize. They are the backbone of crypto trading, global remittances, and on-chain finance. What they have often lacked is public-sector legitimacy.

Wyoming’s stablecoin helps close that gap.

It sends a message that stablecoins are not just tools for exchanges and traders. They are payments infrastructure that governments can use, oversee, and improve. That matters for banks, fintechs, regulators, and institutions that have been watching from the sidelines.

It also strengthens the case that stablecoins are not a threat to the dollar, but an extension of it. This token is explicitly dollar-backed, designed to move dollars faster and more efficiently, not replace them.

 

The bigger picture

The launch itself is only the beginning.

Over time, a state-issued stablecoin opens the door to faster government payments, real-time settlement for contractors, easier cross-border transactions, and new ways to move money without relying on slow banking rails.

Just as importantly, it creates a reference point. Other states now have a working example to study, critique, and potentially copy. That alone raises the odds that stablecoin innovation in the U.S. accelerates rather than stalls.

Adoption will still matter. Liquidity, exchange access, and user experience will determine whether this becomes widely used or remains a niche tool. But the foundation is there, and it is far more serious than anything seen before from a state government.

For years, crypto advocates have argued that blockchains are better infrastructure for money. Faster settlement. Fewer intermediaries. More transparency. More programmability.

Wyoming just put that argument into practice.

By launching a fully backed, multi-chain dollar stablecoin, the state has shown that crypto is not just compatible with public finance, it can improve it. That is a meaningful moment, not just for Wyoming, but for the entire stablecoin ecosystem.

 

This is what progress in crypto often looks like. Quiet, practical, and suddenly very real.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Japan’s Move on XRP Could Signal Real Change in How Money Moves Around the World

 

Japan is quietly laying some important groundwork that could make XRP more than just another crypto token. What’s happening now in Tokyo and in the country’s banking corridors could shape the way large pools of capital get sent across borders in the years ahead.

The big idea circulating among traders and institutional tech teams is that Japan is turning its regulatory and financial attention toward programmable settlement rails. XRP fits into that picture because it can move value fast and cheaply. But the real story is about infrastructure, banks, and the rules that let them play without fear of breaking the law.

Here’s what’s going on.

 

Regulation is Shifting from Theory to Reality

For years Japan has talked about clarifying how digital assets should be treated under the law. That conversation has been moving into serious policy change. Regulators in Tokyo are preparing updates that would treat crypto assets more like traditional financial products. That changes the risk profile for big incumbents. It makes it easier for banks and brokers to offer crypto services without special carve-outs or excessive legal gymnastics.

At the same time, Japan’s government has publicly backed projects from major banking groups to issue stablecoins. This is the kind of step that signals policymakers see on-chain settlement as more than a novelty. Stablecoins are the closest thing in crypto to digital cash, and when big banks start experimenting with them, it opens the door for broader adoption.

For XRP specifically, these regulatory shifts matter because they reduce uncertainty. If regulators are saying, “Yes, this is finance. Let’s give clear rules,” then large institutions are closer to saying, “Yes, we can build real products here.”

 

SBI and Ripple: A Relationship That Keeps Delivering

Much of the buzz around XRP in Japan centers on the work between SBI Group and Ripple. These two have been collaborating for years to push payment innovation, remittance services, and now regulated digital asset distribution.

One of the biggest developments to watch is the planned rollout of a regulated stablecoin called RLUSD in Japan. Ripple and SBI’s exchange arm have said they intend to bring it to market soon. While RLUSD isn’t XRP itself, it matters to XRP as part of the ecosystem. More regulated on-chain money means more use cases where a fast settlement asset like XRP can add real value.

If RLUSD gets traction and institutions start using it for real flows, that could create a halo effect for XRP. Liquidity and rails built around regulated tokens help the whole market.

 

What “Integration” Really Means

When the headlines say “Japan is adopting XRP,” it doesn’t literally mean every bank is running XRP nodes tomorrow. What’s actually happening is more nuanced. There are three main layers in play:

1. Remittance and payment rails The work between SBI entities and others to offer faster and cheaper cross-border payments is a base layer. XRP’s speed and low cost make it interesting here.

2. Regulated stablecoin frameworks These open the door for tokenized fiat in ways that Japan’s largest banks can legally touch.

3. Capital markets access If Japanese brokers and banks can offer structured products involving XRP, that could lead to real institutional capital flows.

That last part is what people mean when they talk about “global capital flows.” It’s not just remittance. It’s corporate treasury movement, fund flows, cross-border settlement in amounts that matter to institutional desks.

 

The Bigger Picture on Liquidity

For XRP to truly shine as a bridge asset, liquidity and execution quality have to be reliable around the clock. This isn’t just about regulatory licenses. It’s about markets that don’t freeze up when volatility hits. So while Japan might be creating the conditions for adoption, the rest of the ecosystem has to be ready too.

But here’s the positive spin: the institutional interest in XRP is no longer theoretical. It’s tied to real product plans, real regulatory engagement, and partnerships with major financial groups.

 

Why This Matters Outside Japan

If Japan ends up with a live, regulated stack that includes stablecoins, regulated exchanges, bank participation, and real settlement activity, that becomes a proof point. Other countries watch this stuff. When a major developed market shows it can integrate crypto tech with regulated finance, it marks a shift in global capital infrastructure.

That doesn’t guarantee XRP will win every corridor or every use case. But it does mean that XRP is not sitting on the crypto fringes. Japan’s approach shows it is being considered in serious planning for next-generation settlement rails.

 

What to Watch in the Coming Months

Real adoption doesn’t come from announcements alone. What we want to see is:

• Live throughput on remittance corridors using on-chain settlement.

• Institutional partners offering XRP exposure in regulated products.

• Bank and broker integration that goes beyond pilot mode.

• Stablecoin and regulated token use that actually moves significant value.

If those conditions start showing up in quarterly reports and product launches, then the narrative shifts from potential to performance.

 

Bottom Line

Japan is not shouting at the top of its lungs that XRP is the future money rail. What is happening is more meaningful. The country is building a compliant, regulated framework that makes it possible for assets like XRP to be used in real capital movement at scale.

 

In an industry where regulation and finance often move at glacial pace, this feels like movement. For XRP holders and anyone watching the evolution of cross-border settlement, that is headline-worthy. It might not be the revolution yet, but it could easily be the start of one.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Stablecoins May Be Crypto’s Most Important Success Story

 

Stablecoins are not exciting.

They do not spike overnight. They do not crash and wipe out portfolios. They are not the thing people argue about on social media at two in the morning. Most days, they are barely mentioned at all.

And yet, when you look past the noise and actually follow where money moves in crypto, stablecoins are everywhere. They sit in the background of trades, payments, payouts, and transfers. They are the part of crypto people rely on without thinking about it.

That is usually how real adoption starts.

 

The Boring Part of Crypto Is Doing the Heavy Lifting

Stablecoins exist to do one job: move money without drama.

They are designed to stay pegged to a currency, usually the US dollar. One token equals one dollar. No guessing. No watching charts. No hoping the price holds long enough to send a payment.

That might not sound revolutionary, but in crypto, it is a big deal.

For years, using crypto for anything practical meant dealing with volatility. Stablecoins remove that problem. They let people move value on-chain without turning every transaction into a speculative bet.

That is why traders use them. That is why businesses are paying attention. And that is why stablecoins quietly became the default currency of crypto.

 

Why Stablecoins Keep Growing Even When Markets Cool Off

When markets slow down, most crypto activity drops with them. Stablecoin usage usually does not.

The reason is simple. Stablecoins are not about price. They are about function.

Traditional financial systems are slow and expensive in ways people have mostly just accepted. Transfers take days. Cross-border payments get complicated fast. Fees show up in places no one asked for.

Stablecoins cut through a lot of that. They settle quickly. They move globally. They do not care what day it is or which country you are in.

For individuals, that means easier access to dollar-denominated money. For companies, it means faster settlement and fewer moving parts. None of that depends on whether the market is up or down. Daily users of stablecoins has grown tremendously in the last few years and people should expect to see that continue to skyrocket as more payment rails and use-cases come on board.

 

 

A Lot of Stablecoin Usage Is Invisible on Purpose

One reason stablecoins feel easy to ignore is because they are often hidden.

In many cases, users never touch them directly. A payment looks normal. A balance looks normal. Behind the scenes, stablecoins handle settlement because they are simply better at it.

This is not crypto trying to replace everything at once. It is crypto quietly fixing specific parts of the system that were not working very well to begin with.

And when something works smoothly, no one talks about it.

 

The Real Power Is in Controlling the Flow

The companies that benefit most from stablecoins are often not the ones issuing them.

They are the ones sitting in the middle of payments, wallets, and settlement. They already control how money moves. Stablecoins just make that movement cheaper and faster.

From that position, it does not really matter which stablecoin wins. Volume is what matters. Flow is what matters. Stablescoins are used in a wide variety of settlements and those are growing everyday.

 

 

What Mass Adoption Actually Looks Like

Crypto mass adoption was never going to look like everyone trading tokens or using complex on-chain tools.

It was always going to look boring.

It looks like people getting paid faster. It looks like cheaper transfers. It looks like money moving globally without anyone thinking twice about it.

Stablecoins fit that picture better than almost anything else crypto has produced. They lower the barrier instead of raising it. They work with existing habits instead of fighting them.

For many people, stablecoins are the first time crypto feels practical.

 

Why Stablecoins Matter, Even If They Never Trend

Stablecoins change how money moves.

That turns out to be a much more useful problem to solve.

They support trading. They power on-chain finance. They help businesses operate across borders. They give people access to stable value when local systems fall short.

They do all of this quietly, without asking for attention.

And that is probably why they are working.

Stablecoins are not the loudest part of crypto. They might never be.

But they are becoming the part that actually touches real economic activity at scale. Not in theory. In practice.

By the time stablecoins feel obvious, they will already be everywhere.

 

That is usually how infrastructure wins.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.