
Revolut has scrapped its plan to buy a U.S. bank, deciding instead to apply for a brand new federal banking license directly from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It's a notable gamble that the regulatory winds have shifted enough under the Trump administration to make the slower, riskier path actually the faster one.
The pivot comes after Revolut apparently concluded that acquiring an existing American bank would take longer and create more headaches than originally expected. Sources familiar with the matter say the acquisition route would have forced the digital-only company into owning physical branches, which is basically the opposite of everything Revolut stands for. Not exactly ideal when your whole pitch is "banking on your phone, no branches needed."
Here's where it gets interesting. Revolut is clearly betting that the new administration's much friendlier stance toward fintech and crypto companies means they can actually get a de novo charter approved in a reasonable timeframe. That would have been borderline laughable just two years ago.
The OCC under Biden basically shut the door on crypto firms and fintechs looking for national bank charters. But things changed fast after Trump took office. By late 2025, the agency started conditionally approving charters for companies like Circle and Ripple, which would have been unthinkable under the previous regime. The regulatory floodgates didn't just open, they got ripped off the hinges.
So Revolut's calculation seems to be: why spend months or years trying to negotiate an acquisition, deal with integration nightmares, and inherit a bunch of branches we don't want, when we might be able to get a fresh charter approved faster than ever before?
For those not deep in banking arcana, a de novo license means starting from scratch. You're building a new bank rather than buying an existing one. It's traditionally been the longer, harder path because regulators scrutinize new applications intensely.
But for a company like Revolut, it has some real advantages. They get to build exactly what they want without dealing with legacy systems, outdated tech stacks, or that branch in Des Moines that somehow still uses fax machines. Everything can be designed for mobile-first customers who expect instant everything.
The company already has experience running banks in other markets. They've held a European banking license since 2018 and got a restricted UK banking license in 2024. So it's not like they're starting completely fresh, they know how this game works.
Revolut isn't exactly limping into this application process. The company hit a $75 billion valuation in a secondary share sale back in November 2025, making it one of the most valuable private tech companies in Europe. That funding round pulled in heavy hitters like Coatue, Greenoaks, and even Nvidia's venture arm.
The financials back up the hype too. Revolut reported $4 billion in revenue for 2024, up 72% year over year. Pre-tax profit jumped 149% to $1.4 billion. They've got over 65 million users across 39 countries. These aren't struggling startup numbers, this is a company that's figured out how to grow profitably at scale.
Right now, Revolut operates in the U.S. through a partnership with Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which limits what they can offer. A full federal banking license would unlock deposit accounts, loans, overdraft protection, basically the full menu of services that would let them actually compete as a primary bank rather than a secondary account people use for travel.
The American market is the big prize that Revolut hasn't quite cracked yet. It's the world's largest financial market and arguably the toughest nut to crack for foreign fintechs. But the potential upside is massive.
U.S. consumers have shown they're willing to ditch traditional banks for digital alternatives. Chime has millions of customers. SoFi went public. There's clearly appetite for what Revolut does, they just need the regulatory approvals to do it properly.
The company calls itself "the world's first global financial superapp," which is the kind of ambitious branding you'd expect from a $75 billion fintech. But you can't really claim to be global if you're hamstrung in the U.S. market.
The U.S. license application fits into Revolut's broader expansion blitz. They applied for a banking license in Peru in January 2026, their fifth market in Latin America after Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil. They've also moved into India, got regulatory approval in the UAE, and announced a $1.1 billion investment in France over three years.
Latin America in particular seems ripe for disruption. In Peru, the top four banks control over 82% of total loans. That kind of concentration creates opportunities for newcomers, especially ones focused on remittances and cross-border payments where traditional banks tend to charge hefty fees.
Revolut's crypto capabilities might actually help its case, which would have sounded absurd a few years ago. The company runs a crypto exchange called Revolut X and has a MiCA license from Cyprus to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area.
Under Trump, the OCC has made clear that crypto activities are fair game for national banks, assuming they have proper risk controls. The agency issued multiple interpretive letters throughout 2025 clarifying that banks can do crypto custody, stablecoin activities, and participate in blockchain networks.
The GENIUS Act passed in July 2025 created a federal framework for payment stablecoins, requiring full reserve backing and putting federal banking regulators in charge of oversight. That kind of regulatory clarity is exactly what banks need to feel comfortable offering crypto services without worrying they'll get slapped down later.
So Revolut's crypto experience could actually be a selling point rather than a liability, depending on who's reviewing the application.
Revolut has some baggage to deal with. The company's customer service has been criticized pretty heavily, with some customers reporting major difficulties resolving fraud claims or getting help with account issues.
In 2023, Action Fraud in the UK received 10,000 reports of fraud naming Revolut, which was more than Barclays, one of Britain's biggest banks. Consumer organization Which? has warned people not to keep large amounts of money with Revolut, citing concerns about fraud reimbursement.
Those aren't the kind of headlines that make regulators eager to approve your banking license application. The OCC is going to want to see evidence that Revolut has seriously upgraded its consumer protection and customer support operations. A few bad reviews are one thing, but systematic problems with fraud response could sink the whole application.
Revolut confirmed it's exploring multiple paths for U.S. expansion but the de novo license is currently the priority. They haven't said when they'll formally submit the application or how long they expect the process to take.
The OCC typically aims to make decisions within 120 days of accepting an application, though that timeline can stretch depending on complexity. Given Revolut's size, international operations, and the breadth of services they want to offer, this probably won't be a quick rubber stamp approval.
Still, the recent approvals for crypto-focused companies suggest the regulatory environment is about as friendly as it's been in years. If there was ever a time to roll the dice on a de novo application, this is probably it.
Revolut's strategic flip illustrates how quickly regulatory changes can reshape business strategy. Two years ago, every fintech was looking at acquisitions as the realistic path into U.S. banking. Now the calculus has completely reversed for some companies.
The Trump administration's lighter touch on fintech and crypto regulation has opened a window that might not stay open forever. Companies are rushing to get applications in while the getting's good. Whether this regulatory approach proves sustainable long-term is anyone's guess, but for now it's created opportunities that simply didn't exist under the previous administration.
For Revolut specifically, cracking the U.S. market is kind of the final boss level in their quest to become a truly global financial platform. They've got strong financials, solid user growth, and a regulatory environment that's actually receptive to innovation for once.
The next few months will show whether their bet on going the de novo route pays off, or if U.S. banking regulation proves too complex even for a $75 billion company to navigate smoothly. Either way, it's going to be an interesting case study in how fintechs approach regulatory strategy in an era of rapid political change.
One thing's for sure though: if Revolut pulls this off, expect every other major fintech to start reconsidering their U.S. market strategies too.

Japan is quietly laying some important groundwork that could make XRP more than just another crypto token. What’s happening now in Tokyo and in the country’s banking corridors could shape the way large pools of capital get sent across borders in the years ahead.
The big idea circulating among traders and institutional tech teams is that Japan is turning its regulatory and financial attention toward programmable settlement rails. XRP fits into that picture because it can move value fast and cheaply. But the real story is about infrastructure, banks, and the rules that let them play without fear of breaking the law.
Here’s what’s going on.
For years Japan has talked about clarifying how digital assets should be treated under the law. That conversation has been moving into serious policy change. Regulators in Tokyo are preparing updates that would treat crypto assets more like traditional financial products. That changes the risk profile for big incumbents. It makes it easier for banks and brokers to offer crypto services without special carve-outs or excessive legal gymnastics.
At the same time, Japan’s government has publicly backed projects from major banking groups to issue stablecoins. This is the kind of step that signals policymakers see on-chain settlement as more than a novelty. Stablecoins are the closest thing in crypto to digital cash, and when big banks start experimenting with them, it opens the door for broader adoption.
For XRP specifically, these regulatory shifts matter because they reduce uncertainty. If regulators are saying, “Yes, this is finance. Let’s give clear rules,” then large institutions are closer to saying, “Yes, we can build real products here.”
Much of the buzz around XRP in Japan centers on the work between SBI Group and Ripple. These two have been collaborating for years to push payment innovation, remittance services, and now regulated digital asset distribution.
One of the biggest developments to watch is the planned rollout of a regulated stablecoin called RLUSD in Japan. Ripple and SBI’s exchange arm have said they intend to bring it to market soon. While RLUSD isn’t XRP itself, it matters to XRP as part of the ecosystem. More regulated on-chain money means more use cases where a fast settlement asset like XRP can add real value.
If RLUSD gets traction and institutions start using it for real flows, that could create a halo effect for XRP. Liquidity and rails built around regulated tokens help the whole market.
When the headlines say “Japan is adopting XRP,” it doesn’t literally mean every bank is running XRP nodes tomorrow. What’s actually happening is more nuanced. There are three main layers in play:
Remittance and payment rails The work between SBI entities and others to offer faster and cheaper cross-border payments is a base layer. XRP’s speed and low cost make it interesting here.
Regulated stablecoin frameworks These open the door for tokenized fiat in ways that Japan’s largest banks can legally touch.
Capital markets access If Japanese brokers and banks can offer structured products involving XRP, that could lead to real institutional capital flows.
That last part is what people mean when they talk about “global capital flows.” It’s not just remittance. It’s corporate treasury movement, fund flows, cross-border settlement in amounts that matter to institutional desks.
For XRP to truly shine as a bridge asset, liquidity and execution quality have to be reliable around the clock. This isn’t just about regulatory licenses. It’s about markets that don’t freeze up when volatility hits. So while Japan might be creating the conditions for adoption, the rest of the ecosystem has to be ready too.
But here’s the positive spin: the institutional interest in XRP is no longer theoretical. It’s tied to real product plans, real regulatory engagement, and partnerships with major financial groups.
If Japan ends up with a live, regulated stack that includes stablecoins, regulated exchanges, bank participation, and real settlement activity, that becomes a proof point. Other countries watch this stuff. When a major developed market shows it can integrate crypto tech with regulated finance, it marks a shift in global capital infrastructure.
That doesn’t guarantee XRP will win every corridor or every use case. But it does mean that XRP is not sitting on the crypto fringes. Japan’s approach shows it is being considered in serious planning for next-generation settlement rails.
Real adoption doesn’t come from announcements alone. What we want to see is:
Live throughput on remittance corridors using on-chain settlement.
Institutional partners offering XRP exposure in regulated products.
Bank and broker integration that goes beyond pilot mode.
Stablecoin and regulated token use that actually moves significant value.
If those conditions start showing up in quarterly reports and product launches, then the narrative shifts from potential to performance.
Japan is not shouting at the top of its lungs that XRP is the future money rail. What is happening is more meaningful. The country is building a compliant, regulated framework that makes it possible for assets like XRP to be used in real capital movement at scale.
In an industry where regulation and finance often move at glacial pace, this feels like movement. For XRP holders and anyone watching the evolution of cross-border settlement, that is headline-worthy. It might not be the revolution yet, but it could easily be the start of one.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.


For years, stablecoins have lived in an uncomfortable gray zone in the U.S. financial system. Big enough to matter, but never quite official enough to be fully welcomed. That may finally be changing.
On December 16, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took a significant step by proposing the first formal rules for stablecoins under the recently passed GENIUS Act. It is the clearest signal yet that Washington intends to treat certain stablecoins less like an experiment and more like financial infrastructure.
This is not a sweeping overhaul overnight. But it is a meaningful start.
The FDIC’s proposal focuses on process before product. Rather than setting hard capital or reserve requirements immediately, the agency is laying out how banks can apply to issue stablecoins through regulated subsidiaries.
In simple terms, the rule defines how a bank asks permission, what information regulators expect to see, how long the FDIC has to respond, and what happens if an application is rejected.
Under the proposal, banks would submit detailed applications covering governance, risk management, compliance controls, and operational readiness. The FDIC would have set timelines to review submissions, determine whether they are complete, and issue approvals or denials. There is also an appeals process, which is notable in a space where regulatory decisions have often felt opaque.
There is even a temporary safe harbor for early applicants, giving institutions a window to engage before all GENIUS Act requirements fully take effect.
None of this is flashy. That is the point.
The FDIC’s move only makes sense in the context of the GENIUS Act, which passed earlier this year after years of stalled crypto legislation. The law created a new category for payment stablecoins and, crucially, decided who gets to supervise them.
Under the act, stablecoins designed for payments are no longer left floating between agencies. The FDIC is responsible for stablecoin-issuing subsidiaries of insured banks, while other regulators handle different corners of the market.
The law also sets the broad expectations. Stablecoins must be fully backed, redeemable at par, and supported by transparent reserves. They are not treated as securities, and they are not left entirely to state regulators either.
That clarity alone has shifted the leading question from “Is this allowed?” to “How does this work in practice?”
What stands out about the FDIC proposal is how procedural it is. This is not Washington hyping innovation or trying to pick winners. It is regulators building guardrails, slowly and deliberately.
That may frustrate parts of the crypto industry that hoped for faster approval paths or broader access for nonbank issuers. But for traditional financial institutions, this kind of rulemaking is familiar. It reduces uncertainty, and uncertainty is often the biggest barrier to participation.
Banks have been hesitant to touch stablecoins directly, not because they lacked interest, but because the regulatory consequences were unclear. This proposal begins to close that gap.
The current proposal is only the first layer. The FDIC and other agencies are expected to follow with rules covering capital, liquidity, reserve composition, and ongoing supervision.
Those details will matter. A lot.
Too strict, and stablecoin issuance could remain concentrated among a small number of players. Too loose, and regulators risk recreating the same fragilities they are trying to prevent.
There is also the question of how these U.S. rules will interact with frameworks emerging in Europe and Asia. Stablecoins move across borders easily. Regulation does not.
Stablecoins are no longer just a crypto market issue. They sit at the intersection of payments, banking, and monetary policy.
If regulated correctly, they could make settlement faster, cheaper, and more resilient. If handled poorly, they could introduce new forms of run risk into the financial system.
The FDIC’s proposal suggests regulators understand that tension. This is not an endorsement of stablecoins, but it is an acknowledgment that they are not going away.
After years of debate, enforcement actions, and regulatory silence, the U.S. is finally starting to write the rulebook. Slowly. Carefully. And very much on its own terms.
That alone marks a turning point.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

A Major Step Toward Bringing Crypto to Everyone
Aave has taken a bold leap forward in decentralized finance by releasing a new consumer app designed to feel as familiar as traditional online banking. The launch represents a major shift in the DeFi landscape. Instead of forcing users through complicated Web3 interfaces, wallet setups and high technical hurdles, Aave has introduced a clean, simple and user friendly application that could finally push crypto into mainstream adoption.
This is not just another front end for Aave. It is a complete rethinking of how DeFi can look and feel for everyday users.
The new Aave app offers high yield savings on stablecoins, automatic compounding, and a smooth experience that resembles a modern fintech platform. Users can deposit stablecoins and earn interest instantly, with no minimum deposit and no complex understanding of lending markets required.
Other reports highlight several key features:
yields ranging from 6 percent to 9 percent depending on the asset,
balance protection up to 1 million dollars, which is significantly higher than typical FDIC limits,
a sleek and intuitive design that mirrors top neobanks,
an iOS waitlist already live, with Android and web versions on the way.
The goal is simple. Bring DeFi to people who have never touched crypto before.
Until now, decentralized finance has mainly attracted crypto natives. You needed a wallet, private keys, bridges, an understanding of smart contract risks, and the patience to navigate unfamiliar tools. That barrier kept DeFi from growing beyond millions of users when the potential market is billions.
Aave’s new approach removes many of those obstacles. The app feels like a normal banking product while still giving users the power and control of decentralized finance.
Aave already has more deposits than many real world banks, and its total value locked places it in the same conversation as major financial institutions. By offering an app that mirrors a bank account while providing higher yields and self custody, Aave is directly challenging traditional finance in a way DeFi has not done before.
The application integrates:
streamlined onboarding,
high yield savings,
transparent risk information,
smart contract protections,
potential debit card functionality,
an always accessible self custody wallet.
This is financial technology, not a crypto experiment.
Aave’s app is powered by one of the most battle tested and liquid protocols in DeFi. Aave V3 and the upcoming V4 upgrades provide a robust risk management system, cross chain liquidity, and deep institutional integrations. That foundation gives the new app stability and credibility that most consumer facing crypto products lack.
Key elements include:
multi chain lending infrastructure,
billions of dollars in locked liquidity,
real world asset integrations,
a decade of security audits and upgrades,
transparent yields derived from on chain markets.
Aave is not building from scratch. It is using proven infrastructure to deliver a new kind of financial experience.
Aave’s bold move raises several important questions and opportunities:
Will traditional finance users adopt the app at scale? Early interest appears strong, but mass adoption is the real test.
High yields are a major draw, but long term stability depends on how lending markets behave, how demand evolves, and how efficiently the app allocates liquidity.
Consumer finance sits under heavy regulation. Aave will need to navigate evolving frameworks, especially because the app offers yield, consumer protections, and custody features.
Other DeFi protocols and crypto banks will likely respond. If Aave’s model succeeds, we may see a wave of similar products emerging quickly.
Because the app feels like a bank, users will expect reliability and safety at a level far higher than typical DeFi platforms. Aave must live up to those expectations.
Aave’s new app brings DeFi closer to everyday financial use than ever before. It takes the most proven parts of decentralized finance and wraps them in a product that anyone can understand, anyone can use and anyone can trust without needing deep crypto expertise.
If Aave succeeds, this could be a breakthrough moment. The first DeFi app that ordinary people use not because they believe in crypto, but because it simply works better than a bank account.
This launch signals a new phase for the industry. DeFi is no longer just advanced financial infrastructure for power users. It is starting to become a real consumer product.
And that changes everything.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

A U.S. appeals court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, has affirmed that Custodia Bank is not automatically entitled to a Federal Reserve master account. The ruling supports an earlier decision from a Wyoming district court, which found that the Federal Reserve has discretion in granting or denying master account privileges.
The case centers on a special-purpose depository institution (SPDI) chartered in Wyoming that focuses on digital assets and crypto services. Custodia applied for a master account in October 2020 with the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and later sued both the Federal Reserve and the Kansas City Fed for what it described as unfair delay and denial of access.
In its judgment, the appeals court agreed that the Fed acted within its legal authority, rejecting Custodia’s claim that it was unlawfully denied access under federal banking laws.
Access to a master account matters because it allows direct participation in core central bank services such as Fedwire and the Automated Clearing House (ACH). Without it, a bank must rely on a partner institution that already holds an account.
For Custodia and other crypto-friendly institutions, this ruling is significant because it reaffirms that eligibility does not guarantee access. Even if an institution meets charter requirements, the Federal Reserve retains discretion to deny or delay master account access.
For the broader banking and crypto industries, this decision sends a clear message: non-traditional or digital asset banks cannot assume central bank access simply because they hold a state charter. The Federal Reserve’s oversight and standards remain firm.
Custodia argued that under the Monetary Control Act of 1980, Federal Reserve services are mandatory for eligible depository institutions. The bank claimed that the word “shall” in the law means entitlement to master account services.
Regulators and legal experts disagreed, stating that the Federal Reserve Act gives the Fed discretion to assess risks and decide whether to grant access.
The court found that Custodia failed to show a legally enforceable right to a master account. It also ruled that Custodia did not properly challenge a “final agency action” under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The district court judge warned that removing the Fed’s discretion could lead to a “race to the bottom,” with states offering light regulations to attract new banks looking for automatic access to Federal Reserve services.
Custodia may still seek further review, but this ruling narrows the path forward. The company can request a rehearing or appeal to the Supreme Court, though both options face long odds.
For the crypto banking industry, the message is clear: meeting state charter requirements is necessary but not enough. Institutions must also demonstrate strong risk management, compliance, and operational standards that meet Federal Reserve expectations.
Regulators and the financial sector will likely use this case as a precedent to define clearer guidelines for digital asset banks. Risk management, anti-money-laundering measures, and transparent governance will remain top priorities before granting master account access.
This case also signals that the Federal Reserve is cautious about integrating crypto-related banks into traditional financial systems until their risk frameworks align with established banking norms.
While the ruling is a setback for Custodia, it reinforces an important principle: access to central bank systems comes with oversight and responsibility. The decision does not shut out crypto banks entirely, but it does raise the bar for entry.
For the broader digital asset sector, this moment highlights the ongoing challenge of bridging innovation with regulation. The focus for crypto banks will now shift from arguing for entitlement to demonstrating readiness — proving that they can meet the same safety, stability, and trust standards that define the U.S. banking system.
In the end, this case is less about denial and more about definition. It sets the boundaries for what a compliant, well-managed crypto bank must look like if it wants a seat at the table in traditional finance.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Western Union is stepping boldly into the future of digital finance. The company has announced plans to launch a U.S. dollar backed stablecoin on the Solana blockchain in early 2026. This initiative marks one of the most significant moves yet by a global money transfer leader to embrace blockchain technology at scale.
Western Union’s stablecoin will be issued by a regulated U.S. bank partner and fully backed by cash and short-term Treasuries. The company aims to deliver instant cross-border settlement, dramatically lower transfer costs, and a modern user experience for millions of customers worldwide.
Western Union’s entry into blockchain payments signals a major milestone for the broader crypto industry. For years, stablecoins have demonstrated their potential to move money quickly and efficiently. Now, one of the largest payment companies in the world is validating that model.
Rather than viewing crypto as a competitor, Western Union is integrating it into its business. The company’s network of digital users, agents, and mobile partners will give blockchain payments global reach. This could open new corridors for stablecoin adoption in countries that depend heavily on remittances.
Solana’s technology is at the heart of this project. The network is known for its high transaction speed, low fees, and scalability, which are critical factors for small-value remittances. Solana can process thousands of transactions per second with settlement finality measured in seconds.
These capabilities make Solana a practical choice for Western Union’s global payment volume. Low-cost transfers ensure affordability for customers, while rapid settlement creates a better experience for both senders and receivers. Solana’s expanding ecosystem of wallets, exchanges, and payment apps also strengthens the project’s foundation for future growth.
Western Union brings something to the blockchain space that few crypto projects can match: decades of experience in global money movement, deep compliance expertise, and an existing infrastructure for cash pick-up and payout. Combining these strengths with Solana’s performance creates a bridge between traditional finance and digital assets.
Anchorage Digital, Western Union’s issuance and custody partner, ensures that the stablecoin is backed by regulated reserves and operates under strict banking standards. This structure combines the security of traditional banking with the speed and transparency of blockchain technology.
This project could have an especially meaningful impact in emerging markets. In many countries, remittances are a vital lifeline for families, yet traditional transfers can take days and cost up to ten percent in fees. A blockchain-based stablecoin can cut those costs significantly while allowing users to hold digital dollars safely during times of local currency volatility.
Western Union’s massive footprint, which includes hundreds of thousands of agent locations and mobile partnerships, allows it to bridge the gap between digital and physical money. Customers could send and receive digital dollars instantly, then cash out locally or use their balance in digital apps.
The Western Union stablecoin represents more than a new product. It is a roadmap for how traditional financial institutions can integrate crypto responsibly. It shows that public blockchains like Solana can serve as infrastructure for regulated money movement on a global scale.
This model could inspire other banks, payment firms, and fintechs to issue stablecoins backed by transparent reserves. It also sets the stage for a world where cross-border transactions happen in seconds, with full auditability and minimal friction.
Western Union’s stablecoin initiative positions it at the intersection of finance and technology. It reflects growing confidence in blockchain as a foundation for everyday payments. If successful, it could redefine how money moves around the world and accelerate mainstream adoption of stablecoins.
This is more than just another digital asset project. It is a vote of confidence in Solana’s technology and in the promise of crypto to create faster, fairer, and more inclusive financial systems.
You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

JPMorgan Chase is preparing to allow institutional clients to use Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings as collateral for loans. This move, expected by year-end, marks a decisive pivot from the bank’s earlier skeptical stance toward cryptocurrencies.
Reports from Bloomberg, CoinDesk and others indicate the program will rely on third-party custody for the pledged assets and extends JPMorgan’s earlier acceptance of crypto-linked ETFs as collateral.
CEO Jamie Dimon long dismissed Bitcoin—calling it “worthless” or a “pet rock”—yet this policy change suggests a hard turn by JPMorgan toward crypto integration.
This is not about hype. It’s about a bank with over $4 trillion in assets formally recognising crypto as part of its credit infrastructure.
Traditionally, banks only accepted highly liquid, low-volatility assets as loan collateral. Bitcoin and Ethereum are neither of those. So JPMorgan’s interest signals crypto is being treated more like mainstream assets—albeit with special guardrails.
Financial institutions now appear ready to unlock liquidity for clients who hold crypto without forcing them to sell. This could reshape how crypto assets are used in major portfolios and by large institutions.
Liquidity without selling: Crypto holders can pledge assets as collateral instead of selling, preserving upside while accessing cash.
Broader adoption: Large banks entering the space bring legitimacy and infrastructure—moving crypto further toward the mainstream.
Competitive pressure: If JPMorgan rolls this out, other banks will likely follow, accelerating institutional crypto services.
Regulatory interplay: The move aligns with a more friendly regulatory tone in Washington and signals that banks believe the legal risks are manageable.
Institutionally focused: The offering is targeted at institutional clients, not retail.
Third-Party Custody Model: Crypto pledged will be held by an approved external custodian, so the bank avoids direct asset custody.
Global Scope: The program is expected to launch “by end of year” across relevant jurisdictions, though final details remain subject to change.
Extension from ETFs: Earlier this year, JPMorgan accepted crypto-linked ETFs as loan collateral. This step advances directly to underlying crypto assets.
Launch Date and Terms: When exactly will the program go live and on what terms (loan-to-value ratios, margin calls, etc.)?
Asset Coverage: Will it start with Bitcoin and Ethereum only, or eventually include other major tokens?
Risk Framework: How will JPMorgan manage volatility, liquidation risk, custody failure and regulatory oversight?
Market Reaction: Will this spur greater institutional crypto investment and service offerings from banks, or will it prompt caution due to the novelty of crypto as collateral?
Competitive Impact: Which banks follow JPMorgan’s lead and how fast will the industry evolve?
JPMorgan’s plan to allow Bitcoin and Ethereum as loan collateral is a landmark for the crypto-banking crossover. It reflects growing confidence in digital assets, regulatory progress and the adoption of the crypto industry.
For crypto investors, this is a strong signal: the era of fringe use-cases is fading, and crypto is increasingly being integrated into core financial services. For the banking sector, it marks the beginning of a new chapter where digital assets may become standard tools in credit and liquidity management.
The details still matter—but the direction is clear. Crypto is stepping firmly into the mainstream.