Balancer Labs, the core team behind the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Balancer, has announced plans to wind down after a $116 million exploit that occurred in November.

 

The decision, according to CEO Marcus Hardt, was driven by the impact of the hack. Despite continuing to generate revenue, Balancer Labs’ economic model was no longer sustainable in the aftermath of the hack.

 

“We were spending too much to attract liquidity relative to what that liquidity was actually generating in revenue,” Hardt said. “We were diluting BAL holders to sustain a system that, in my view, was no longer serving the protocol well. At some point, you have to be honest about that.”

 

With Balancer Labs winding down its operations, the protocol is expected to be managed by the Balancer Foundation and its decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), an approach supported by co-founders Hardt and Fernando Martinelli. 

 

DAO members have been asked to vote on a proposal to restructure the protocol and its tokenomics. If approved, BAL emissions will end, all fees will be routed to the treasury, and the protocol’s share of swap fees will be reduced. The team size will also be cut.

 

So, while Balancer Labs, the core development team, is winding down, the protocol will continue operating under new management with a leaner structure.

 

 

The Balancer Protocol Exploit

On November 3, 2025, Balancer Protocol suffered a smart contract exploit targeting its V2 composable stable pools, resulting in the theft of significant amounts of cryptocurrency.

 

Although Balancer had a permission system in place, a bug in the smart contract allowed the attacker to bypass these controls. The attacker exploited the vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to the protocol’s shared vault system, enabling them to drain assets from multiple liquidity pools across different blockchains simultaneously.

 

The hack had a severe impact on Balancer, causing its total value locked (TVL) to drop from about $775 million to $258 million within days of the exploit, according to a report. Its native token, BAL, also fell by about 30%.

 

The shutdown of the Balancer Labs team comes weeks after crypto aggregator Step Finance announced its own shutdown following a January 31 hack that reportedly led to losses of between $26 million and $40 million from the protocol’s treasury.

 

Bunni, a decentralized liquidity protocol built on Uniswap V4, also shut down around October last year after suffering a hack that resulted in losses of about $8.4 million.

 

 

Bitcoin climbed back toward the $72,000 mark Wednesday as the derivatives market showed telltale signs of growing leverage, putting traders on alert for sharp moves in either direction. The world's largest cryptocurrency rose roughly 1.2% after midnight UTC, mirroring gains across U.S. equity futures, with the Nasdaq 100 up around 1% over the same window. BTC was last seen trading near $71,300, well within the choppy $69,000 to $76,000 band that has defined the market for much of March.

 

The session's gains carried a cautionary undertone. Futures open interest in bitcoin has climbed to a one-week high, driven in large part by short positioning rather than fresh bullish conviction. Traders who have seen BTC get turned away from $72,000 repeatedly appear to be leaning into those rejections rather than chasing a breakout. Funding rates and cumulative volume delta have stayed flat to muted, two readings that analysts typically cite when the OI build is defensive in nature rather than a signal of aggressive dip-buying.

 

$14 Billion Options Expiry Looms Large

The backdrop sharpens considerably when you factor in what is sitting on the calendar for Friday. Deribit, the dominant crypto options venue, is set to settle roughly $14.16 billion in bitcoin contracts at 08:00 UTC on March 27, a figure that accounts for nearly 40% of all open interest on the exchange. The quarterly event is the single largest derivatives settlement of Q1 2026, and it arrives with a specific price level commanding outsized attention.

 

That level is $75,000. According to Deribit, max pain for this Friday's expiry sits right there, meaning it is the price at which the highest number of contracts expire worthless and option writers, typically large funds and institutional players, would owe the least. Deribit Chief Commercial Officer Jean-David Pequignot described the dynamic as a gravitational pull, noting that delta-hedging activity by market makers historically nudges spot prices toward that pain threshold in the hours leading up to settlement.

 

The gap between where bitcoin is trading now and $75,000 is not trivial, a roughly 5% move from current levels. Whether max pain theory ultimately delivers on that gravitational pull remains a matter of debate even inside the industry. But with nearly 40% of Deribit's open interest scheduled to roll off in one session, the mechanical hedging flows alone are worth watching closely.

 

Altcoins Showing Stronger Positioning

While Bitcoin grinds sideways with mounting leverage, a more constructive picture is forming in parts of the altcoin market. Ethereum open interest has climbed to multi-month highs, and the positioning profile looks more directionally bullish than what is currently visible in BTC futures. DeFi-adjacent tokens and AI infrastructure projects are outperforming Bitcoin on a short-term basis, with the CoinDesk Computing Select Index, which tracks TAO, FET, and Chainlink, rising about 1.9% Wednesday to lead all major benchmarks.

 

Chainlink alone accounts for roughly 62% of that index and added 1.5% on the day, while TAO and FET posted gains of 4.9% and 2.9% respectively. The broader CoinDesk 20 benchmark gained around 0.9%, with the altcoin-heavy CoinDesk 80 generally outpacing the bitcoin-heavy CoinDesk 5. The pattern suggests that risk appetite has not evaporated, it is simply migrating toward names where there is clearer near-term narrative momentum.

 

A Market Trapped Between Catalysts

Zoom out and the picture gets harder to trade comfortably. Bitcoin is on pace to close March in the red, which would extend a losing or flat monthly streak to six consecutive months, the longest such run since the 2022 bear market. The final week of the month carries several potential catalysts, including the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures data on March 28, which could shift rate-cut expectations and send ripples through risk assets.

 

For now, the market appears to be threading a needle between a derivatives setup that could pull prices higher ahead of Friday and a macro backdrop that has not yet given bulls a clean reason to push through resistance with conviction. Rising open interest without corresponding spot demand and funding is historically the kind of configuration that resolves violently, though the direction is rarely obvious until it starts moving. With $14 billion in contracts settling in roughly 48 hours, the next few sessions aren't looking to be very quiet.

 

Resolv Labs’ stablecoin, USR, has lost its U.S. dollar peg following an exploit of the token’s contract that allowed attackers to mint millions of tokens.

 

The exploit, which occurred on March 22, 2026, resulted in the creation of 50 million unbacked USR tokens, prompting the team to temporarily pause the protocol’s functions to prevent “further malicious actions.”

 

 

According to YieldsandMore, which first reported the story, the attack began with a 100,000 USDC deposit by the attackers, ultimately causing USR to lose its dollar peg and fall to $0.01.

 

After minting the USR tokens, the attackers converted them into wrapped USR (wstUSR) to access deeper liquidity on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). This allowed them to offload large amounts of wstUSR more gradually, reducing the risk of an immediate price crash of USR.

 

The next phase of the attack involved dumping and selling wstUSR tokens across multiple platforms, including KyberSwap and Velora. Using this method, the attackers swapped wstUSR for USDt and USDC, which were then aggressively converted into Ether (ETH).

 

Although the attack was first made public by the crypto research and analysis group YieldsandMore, the Resolv team was only able to pause the protocol three hours later.

 

“It took ResolvLabs three hours to pause its protocol. Roughly one hour of that delay came from the gap between submitting the multisig transaction and collecting the four required signatures to execute it,” YieldsandMore wrote on X.

 

While 50 million tokens were initially minted by the attackers, blockchain security company PeckShield reported that an additional 30 million USR tokens were later minted, bringing the total to approximately 80 million.

 

 

Price Action of USR in the Aftermath of the Exploit

The minting and dumping of USR tokens triggered a severe depeg, sending its price from $1 to roughly $0.02 to $0.05 within minutes, a decline of about 95 to 97%.

 

Although it briefly rebounded to between $0.14 and $0.20, USR is currently trading at $0.2773, according to data from CoinMarketCap at the time of publication. 

 

The USR depeg ranks among the most severe in recent history, second only to the collapse of Terra's TerraUSD (UST) in 2022, which fell from $1 to $0.02 and lost 98% of its value. Iron Finance also had its IRON stablecoin lose its dollar peg, dropping from $1 to about $0.05.

 

 

Bitcoin surged to $71,200 on Monday as investors are optimisitc on de-escalation of the Iran conflict.

 

The move started when President Trump posted on Truth Social that he had instructed the Department of War to postpone planned strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for five days, following what he called "very good and productive" talks with Tehran. Crypto jumped roughly 5% on the news. Ether climbed above $2,100, BNB pushed through $650, and XRP traded above $1.40. Oil plunged around 11%, S&P 500 futures gained nearly 4%, and global markets added an estimated $2.5 trillion in value within about 20 minutes.

 

Then Iran's state-affiliated Fars News Agency cited an unidentified source denying any talks had taken place. Gains started reversing almost immediately. Bitcoin is now up about 2.5% on the day and down roughly 5% on the week, sitting just under $71,000 after hitting an intraday high of $71,224 per CoinGecko data.

 

The session is the latest chapter in a conflict that has rattled crypto markets since Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28, when the U.S. and Israel struck targets across Iran and killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran's subsequent blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil flows, has kept energy prices elevated and risk appetite suppressed. The Federal Reserve, meeting earlier this month against that backdrop, revised its 2026 inflation forecast upward to 2.7% and signaled a higher-for-longer stance on rates.

 

Despite the chaos, Bitcoin has held above its pre-war price level, a fact that has not gone unnoticed. When the strikes began on a Saturday morning and every traditional market was closed, crypto was the only liquid venue available for investors to respond. That 24/7 trading reality, once seen as a volatility risk, has started looking more like a feature.

 

The five-day pause, if it holds at all, does not end the conflict. Iran continues to strike targets across the Gulf, and Israel would need to sign on to any broader ceasefire. Israel has publicly said it has thousands of remaining targets and requires at least three more weeks of operations. Prediction markets currently favor a ceasefire by late April at the earliest.

 

Bitcoin's 30-day implied volatility index has bounced to 60%, and $791 million in total leveraged positions have been wiped across crypto markets this session according to CoinGlass, with $425 million of those being longs. The clock on Trump's five-day window is ticking, and so is the market's patience.

 

 

Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) pulled off a real power play on Wall Street Thursday, with shares jumping roughly 25% after the company announced it had locked in $125 million in new institutional commitments from a lineup that includes Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest, and Payward, the parent company of crypto exchange Kraken.

 

The raise was led by Bitmine, which committed $75 million, with ARK Invest pledging at least $25 million and Payward rounding out the headline trio with another $25 million of its own. The full investor roster behind ORBS reads like a who's who of the crypto world: Coinfund, Pantera Capital, GSR, FalconX, Discovery Capital Management, and the World Foundation are all listed as backers.

 

But the capital raise wasn't even the most eyebrow-raising piece of news in Thursday's announcement. Eightco simultaneously disclosed it had already closed initial strategic investments of $50 million into OpenAI and $25 million into MrBeast and Beast Industries. 

 

The OpenAI investment, worth approximately $52.5 million in economic interests in the company's equity, closed on March 6, just days before this announcement.

 

 

To understand how we got here, we kind of have to dive a bit deeper. Eightco has had one of the stranger corporate transformations of recent years. The Pennsylvania-based company pivoted from inventory management to cryptocurrencies and is currently developing a universal framework for digital identity and authentication. Not too long ago, its main business was making cardboard boxes through a subsidiary called Ferguson Containers.

 

Now, the company's identity is built around Worldcoin (WLD), the biometric-based digital identity project co-founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. As of March 5, 2026, Eightco's treasury holdings included 277,222,975 WLD tokens, 11,068 ETH, and $82 million in cash. That WLD position, the company says, represents nearly 10% of the token's circulating supply, making ORBS the largest public market holder of Worldcoin on any exchange.

 

The company continues to hold Worldcoin and Ethereum as a long-term believer in the world's second-most valuable cryptocurrency, and frames its Worldcoin stake as foundational to a "proof of humanity" authentication layer it's building out.

 

The vision, as ORBS tells it, is to combine Worldcoin's biometric identity infrastructure with OpenAI's foundational models to create something at the intersection of AI verification, blockchain rails, and mass consumer reach. And it seems that it's clearly a compelling enough pitch to draw in some serious institutional names.

Who's Backing It, and Why

Tom Lee, Chairman of Bitmine, is joining Eightco's Board of Directors, while Brett Winton, Chief Futurist at ARK Invest, will serve as an advisor to the board.

 

Lee's involvement through Bitmine is notable. Bitmine itself has been on an aggressive crypto treasury strategy of its own, positioning itself as the leading Ethereum treasury company in public markets. Bitmine has combined crypto, cash, and "moonshot" holdings ranging well into the billions, and adding Eightco to that ecosystem tightens the connection between the two companies considerably. Lee getting a board seat means this isn't a passive financial bet.

 

His take on the investment was direct. Bitmine sees Eightco sitting at the center of some of the most important future needs and developments in AI, with what Lee described as tremendous synergy between Proof of Human via Worldcoin, OpenAI's foundational models, and the reach of the world's biggest content creator in MrBeast.

 

ARK Invest's Cathie Wood weighed in too, describing ORBS as taking on a unique initiative at the intersection of AI, blockchain, and creator-driven platforms.

 

Kraken's Arjun Sethi was perhaps the most philosophical about the whole thing. The Payward co-CEO framed it around power-law dynamics, suggesting that a small number of platforms tend to capture a disproportionate share of value in technological revolutions, and that ORBS is trying to position itself at the convergence of AI, cryptographic infrastructure, and global digital distribution.

MrBeast and the Distribution Play

The $25 million bet on Beast Industries deserves its own look. On March 10, Eightco invested approximately $25 million in shares of Beast Industries, with $7 million of that amount structured as committed capital that may be funded within 60 days in exchange for additional stock.

 

Beast Industries is the broader enterprise behind YouTube megastar Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast. The company spans entertainment, consumer products, and CPG, with the snack brand Feastables among its faster-growing launches. MrBeast's YouTube channel has over 450 million subscribers and generates more than 5 billion monthly views across all channels.

 

For a blockchain infrastructure play trying to build out digital identity at scale, having a meaningful stake in the world's most-subscribed YouTube channel is an unusual but not entirely illogical move. Distribution is distribution, and Eightco seems to be betting that the future of human authentication online will require massive consumer reach to actually work.

 

Taken together, Eightco is making a bold argument that the convergence of AI identity verification, blockchain infrastructure, and mass consumer distribution represents a huge opportunity, and that a small public company out of Pennsylvania is somehow positioned to sit at the center of it.

 

Whether the OpenAI stake, the MrBeast bet, the Worldcoin treasury, and the Ethereum holdings actually compound into something concrete is still up in the air. The risk disclosures in ORBS's own SEC filings acknowledge this as well, flagging the company's lack of control over private companies where it holds minority stakes, and the ongoing challenges of maintaining Nasdaq listing compliance while burning cash.

 

But the investor lineup announced today isn't made up of amateurs. Pantera, Brevan Howard, Coinfund, and ARK all know what they're doing, and they all decided this particular combination of bets was worth backing.

 

 

An X user with the username "Sillytuna" has reportedly lost $24 million in Aave Ethereum USDC (aEthUSDC) in an attack that involved a combination of violence, sexual assault, weapons, and threats to life.

 

 

"Bruised, held off while I could, but can't do that much with axes over your hands and feet," Sillytuna wrote. The user further stated that he was, at this point, done with crypto. In his words, "And now... definitely out of crypto ****ers."

 

While the matter has already been reported to law enforcement, no official statement has been issued by the authorities. However, the X user has announced a 10% bounty for whoever helps recover the stolen funds.

 

 

 

How the Crypto Community Reacted

Shortly after the news went viral, the crypto community reacted with mixed feelings, with many commiserating with the user over their loss. Some also raised awareness about the deplorable state of security in the United Kingdom. Apparently, the victim is a UK resident.

 

 

Amid the sympathy from the global crypto community, some, however, doubted the authenticity of the victim's story.

 

According to YokaiCapital, an X user, the victim had not posted anything about crypto before. He also alleges that the victim's account appears to have been bought recently.

 

"He will probably shill the coin at some point or say that he will take donations from the coin," YokaiCapital went on to write. 

 

However, the victim has denied allegations that he intentionally wanted to trend and claims the stolen funds were long-term holdings.

 

 

How the Attackers Moved the Stolen Funds

Tracking the stolen funds, blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence said that the attackers moved the funds across Layer 2 networks, Bitcoin, and Monero, obviously to evade trail.

 

 

 

Roughly $20 million of the stolen funds were stored in two Ethereum addresses as DAI, a stablecoin on the Ethereum network, while $2.48 million was bridged to USDC on Arbitrum.

 

Arkham reported that the attackers sent $2.47 million to Hyperliquid through 19 separate Wagyu accounts, which were used to convert the funds to Monero (XMR).

 

The attackers also bridged $1.1 million to the Bitcoin blockchain using LiFi, noting that 0.5 BTC was deposited into a mixing service, Arkham added.

 

 

 

Crypto exchange Kraken has launched xChange, a new on-chain trading engine designed to facilitate trading of its tokenized stocks, xStocks, across Ethereum and Solana.

 

According to Kraken, xChange supports on-chain trading of more than 70 tokenized equities with 1:1 price backing to their underlying shares. To ensure transparency, the platform allows these tokenized equities to track their prices in the public stock market.

 

As a result, tokenized equities on the xChange platform will track their corresponding prices in the public stock market without the involvement of third-party intermediaries.

 

How xChange Is Transforming the Tokenized Equity Market

The tokenized equity market has grown remarkably. According to a January report from DL Research, it expanded approximately 2,800% year over year, rising from about $32 million in January 2024 to $963 million in January 2025.

 

In fact, Token Terminal reported that the tokenized stock and equity market reached an all-time high valuation of $1.2 billion in December 2025.

 

 

 

As tokenized equities continue to gain traction, with monthly trading volumes reaching $800 million, Kraken launched xChange to build on this momentum.

By providing a unified execution layer that connects liquidity across Ethereum and Solana, xChange enables users to execute large trades quickly with minimal slippage.

 

xChange offers atomic on-chain settlement, allowing users to execute trades indivisibly. There are no intermediate states during a trade; orders are either executed in full at the quoted price or not executed at all.

 

xChange also operates 24 hours a day, five days a week across the Ethereum and Solana blockchains. The benefit? Traders can continue trading tokenized equities beyond traditional market hours.

 

 

What xStocks Are

Launched in June 2025, xStocks are tokenized representations of real U.S. stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Although they were launched by Kraken, they are issued by Backed Finance.

 

Although they are not available to users in the United States and the United Kingdom, they are available in more than 140 countries, and their performance so far has been impressive.

 

 

 

Since launch, they have recorded $3.5 billion in on-chain transaction volume and $25 billion in total trading volume across exchanges, with approximately $225 million in tokenized assets held across 80,000 blockchain wallets.

 

 

 

Uniswap Labs has secured a decisive courtroom victory that could ripple across decentralized finance for years.

 

On March 2, a federal judge in New York dismissed, with prejudice, a long-running class action lawsuit accusing the company of facilitating crypto rug pulls on its decentralized exchange. The ruling closes the door on a case first filed in 2022 and underscores a principle that courts are becoming increasingly comfortable with: writing open-source software is not the same as committing securities fraud.

 

 

The Lawsuit That Would Not Go Away

The case began in April 2022, when a group of investors led by Nessa Risley sued Uniswap Labs, founder Hayden Adams, and several high-profile venture capital backers. The plaintiffs alleged that scam tokens traded on Uniswap had caused substantial losses and argued that the protocol’s creators should bear responsibility.

 

At its core, the lawsuit tried to stretch traditional securities law into a decentralized environment. The argument was relatively straightforward. If fraudulent tokens were being created and traded on Uniswap, and if Uniswap’s infrastructure made that trading possible, then perhaps the developers and investors behind the protocol were on the hook.

 

The problem for the plaintiffs was always going to be causation and knowledge.

 

But Uniswap is a permissionless protocol built on Ethereum. Anyone can deploy a token. Anyone can create a liquidity pool. Smart contracts execute swaps automatically. There is no listing committee. No approval process. No centralized trading desk.

 

Over the past four years, the case wound through motions to dismiss, amendments to complaints, and an appeal to the Second Circuit. Federal securities claims were largely thrown out earlier in the process. What remained were state law claims, including allegations that Uniswap had aided and abetted fraudulent conduct.

 

This week, those claims fell too. Manhattan federal judge Katherin Polk Failla dismissed the suit with prejudice on Monday.

 

Why the Court Said No

Judge Katherine Polk Failla dismissed the second amended complaint with prejudice, meaning the plaintiffs cannot bring the same claims again.

 

The reasoning was technical but important. To establish aiding and abetting liability, plaintiffs generally must show that a defendant had actual knowledge of wrongdoing and substantially assisted it. The court found that the complaint failed on both fronts.

 

There were no plausible allegations that Uniswap Labs knew about specific rug pulls before they happened. Nor was there evidence that the company took affirmative steps to advance fraudulent schemes. Providing a neutral, automated protocol that others can use, even if some use it badly, was not enough.

 

The court drew comparisons to other neutral infrastructure. Payment networks process transactions that later turn out to be illicit. Messaging apps are used for scams. Internet service providers transmit fraudulent communications. Yet courts have historically hesitated to hold those intermediaries liable absent clear knowledge and participation.

 

The same logic, at least here, applied to DeFi.

 

The dismissal with prejudice sends a strong signal. 

 

 

A Win for Protocol Neutrality

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams described the outcome as sensible. Company lawyers called it precedent-setting. That may not be an exaggeration.

 

The Second Circuit had already affirmed dismissal of the core securities claims last year, reinforcing the notion that decentralized trading protocols are not automatically securities exchanges under existing law. This final ruling on the remaining state claims sharpens the boundary further.

 

Developers who publish autonomous smart contracts are not, by default, guarantors of every token that trades through them.

 

If courts had ruled the other way, it would have opened the door to expansive liability for developers across DeFi. Automated market makers, lending protocols, even wallet providers could have found themselves exposed whenever bad actors exploited open systems.

 

Instead, the judiciary appears to be drawing a line between building infrastructure and orchestrating fraud.

 

 

Venture Capital Backers Breathe Easier

The case also named major venture capital firms that invested in Uniswap Labs. While those firms were not accused of directly launching scam tokens, plaintiffs argued that by funding and promoting the protocol, they shared responsibility.

 

Those claims have now effectively collapsed alongside the broader case.

 

For crypto VCs, the ruling reduces a specific litigation risk. Investing in a protocol that later hosts fraudulent activity does not automatically translate into liability, at least under the theories tested here.

 

Still, risk has not disappeared. Regulators continue to scrutinize token listings, governance structures, and revenue models. And courts have not issued a blanket immunity for DeFi projects.

 

What this case does suggest is that stretching traditional intermediary liability to decentralized software will be an uphill battle.

 

 

A Move in the Right Direction

The broader regulatory environment for crypto remains unsettled. Lawmakers are still debating market structure legislation. Agencies continue to spar over jurisdiction. Courts are gradually filling in gaps.

 

Uniswap’s victory does not settle whether certain tokens are securities. It does not resolve how decentralized autonomous organizations should be treated under U.S. law. And it certainly does not eliminate fraud in DeFi.

 

But it does clarify one thing.

 

Writing code that others misuse is not, without more, a securities violation.

 

For an industry that has spent years arguing that decentralized protocols are more like public infrastructure than traditional financial institutions, this ruling is validation. It also places pressure back where many judges seem to believe it belongs, on the individuals who design and execute scams.

 

As DeFi matures, that distinction between neutral tools and active misconduct will likely remain central. The Uniswap case may not be the final word, but it is an important chapter in defining how far platform liability extends in crypto’s open markets.

 

Ethereum has been stuck in a prolonged downtrend. Prices are down more than 60 percent from the August 2025 highs, sentiment is shaky, and some analysts are floating scenarios where ETH could revisit the $1,400 level before finding a durable bottom.

 

And yet, through all that noise, something else is happening in the background.

 

Investors are still buying BitMine, as BitMine is buying more Ethereum.

 

Not trimming. Not waiting. Buying. In some cases, buying aggressively.

 

 

Ethereum Weakness Sets the Stage

The broader crypto market has been under pressure for months. Spot Ethereum ETFs have seen notable outflows, a sharp contrast to the steady demand flowing into Bitcoin products. That divergence has reinforced the narrative that institutions are leaning toward relative safety in BTC while treating ETH with more caution.

 

Ethereum’s price action reflects that hesitation. Lower highs, fading rallies, and persistent risk off positioning have defined the tape. Even bullish long term analysts concede that the near term setup remains fragile.

 

But the selloff has not scared everyone away.

 

 

BitMine Is Doubling Down

BitMine Immersion Technologies, (BMNR), has quietly become one of the largest corporate holders of ETH after pivoting to an Ethereum treasury strategy in 2025 under Chairman Tom Lee.

 

The company has accumulated millions of tokens, building a balance sheet that is heavily exposed to Ethereum. That exposure has not looked pretty on paper during the drawdown. Reports show billions in unrealized losses as ETH retraced from its highs.

 

Still, BitMine has continued to add.

 

Rather than slowing purchases during weakness, the company has leaned into the downturn. The logic appears straightforward. If the long term thesis around Ethereum remains intact, lower prices represent opportunity rather than risk.

 

It is a classic buy the dip strategy, but on a corporate scale.

 

 

Ark Invest Adds More Shares

Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest has reinforced that narrative. The firm has repeatedly increased its exposure to BitMine across multiple ETFs, adding millions of dollars worth of BMNR shares even as Ethereum remained under pressure. The firm bought a total of 212,314 shares across three of its exchange-traded funds, worth $4.2 million based on Thursday's closing price.

 

Ark has a history of leaning into volatility in high conviction themes. Crypto infrastructure and blockchain exposure remain central to its long horizon strategy. In that context, adding BitMine during a downtrend fits the pattern.

 

For Ark, the weakness in ETH may be noise relative to the structural growth story around smart contracts, tokenization, and onchain financial rails.

 

 

BlackRock Increases Its Stake

It is not just Ark.

 

BlackRock has also boosted its BMNR position significantly, increasing its holdings by more than 165 percent according to recent disclosures. That scale of increase is difficult to ignore, especially in a market where Ethereum linked products have seen soft flows.

 

The timing is notable. While some funds reduced direct ETH exposure through ETFs, large asset managers appear comfortable gaining exposure indirectly through equity vehicles like BitMine.

 

For institutions that prefer regulated equity structures over direct token custody, BMNR offers a levered proxy. It packages Ethereum exposure inside a public company wrapper, complete with traditional reporting and corporate governance.

 

That structure can matter for mandates that limit direct crypto ownership.

 

Why Buy BitMine When ETH Is Falling

At first glance, the trade looks counterintuitive. Ethereum is in a downtrend. ETF flows are mixed at best. Volatility remains elevated.

 

But the bull case rests on a few pillars.

 

First, long term fundamentals. Ethereum still anchors decentralized finance, stablecoin issuance, and a growing tokenization ecosystem. Institutional advocates argue that the network’s utility has not disappeared simply because price momentum has faded.

 

Second, balance sheet leverage. BitMine’s growing ETH treasury creates a scenario where equity performance can amplify moves in the underlying asset. For investors who believe ETH eventually reclaims higher levels, BMNR can offer outsized upside.

 

Third, cycle dynamics. Crypto markets have a history of brutal drawdowns followed by sharp recoveries. Accumulating during periods of pessimism has historically rewarded patient capital, even if timing the bottom is nearly impossible.

 

Investors are clearly looking past the next few quarters and thinking long term on Ethereum.

 

 

The Bottom Line

There is a clear split in the market right now.

 

Short term traders are reacting to chart levels, macro uncertainty, and ETF flow data. Long term allocators appear to be focusing on strategic positioning.

 

The continued accumulation of BitMine shares by names like Ark Invest and BlackRock suggests that institutional conviction in Ethereum infrastructure has not broken, even if spot prices have.

 

That does not guarantee a rebound. Ethereum could test lower levels before sentiment turns. Volatility is part of the asset class.

 

But the steady bid under BitMine tells its own story.

 

Even in a downtrend, capital is being deployed...with intent.

 

For now, Ethereum may be drifting lower. BitMine buyers, however, are still stepping in and definitely betting on Ethereum for the long haul.

 

Robinhood is going deeper into crypto infrastructure.

 

The company has launched the public testnet for Robinhood Chain, its own Ethereum layer 2 network built on Arbitrum’s rollup technology. Until now, Robinhood has mostly acted as a gateway, letting users trade crypto and, in some regions, tokenized equities. This move changes that. It is now building the underlying blockchain where those assets could live.

 

It is a meaningful shift. Running a brokerage app is one thing. Operating blockchain infrastructure is another.

 

 

What Robinhood Chain Actually Is

Robinhood Chain is a permissionless Ethereum layer 2. It uses Arbitrum’s technology, which means it inherits Ethereum’s security while offering lower transaction costs and higher throughput through rollups.

 

“With Arbitrum’s developer-friendly technology, Robinhood Chain is well-positioned to help the industry deliver the next chapter of tokenization and permissionless financial services,” said Steven Goldfeder, Co-Founder and CEO of Offchain Labs. “Working alongside the Robinhood team, we are excited to help build the next stage of finance.”

 

For developers, it is EVM compatible. Smart contracts built for Ethereum can be deployed here with standard tooling. Wallets, developer libraries, and infrastructure services should feel familiar.

 

On paper, nothing radical. The differentiation is not in the virtual machine. It is in the intended use case.

 

 

The Core Bet: Tokenized Stocks

Robinhood is clearly focused on tokenized real world assets, especially public equities and ETFs.

 

The company has already offered tokenized stock exposure in Europe. Now it is building infrastructure that could support broader issuance and trading of these assets directly onchain.

 

A big part of the pitch is continuous trading. Crypto markets operate 24 7. Traditional stock exchanges do not. If equities are represented as tokens on a blockchain, they can, in theory, trade at any time and settle much faster than traditional systems.

 

That sounds straightforward. In practice, it depends heavily on regulatory clarity. Tokenized securities raise questions around custody, investor protections, and jurisdictional restrictions. Robinhood has acknowledged this and appears to be designing the chain with compliance in mind.

 

 

Compliance Is Not an Afterthought

Unlike many general purpose layer 2 networks, Robinhood Chain is being built with regulated financial products as the primary target.

 

That means infrastructure that can handle minting and burning of tokenized securities in a controlled way. It likely also means features that support jurisdiction based restrictions and other compliance requirements at the protocol or system level.

 

Robinhood has not framed this as a purely decentralized experiment. It is positioning the network as financial infrastructure, with guardrails.

 

That will appeal to some institutions. It may frustrate parts of the crypto community. Both reactions are predictable.

 

 

Infrastructure Partners in Place

Robinhood is not building this alone.

 

Chainlink is involved to provide oracle services, which are essential if you are dealing with tokenized stocks that need accurate real world price feeds. Alchemy is supporting developer infrastructure. Other analytics and compliance firms are integrated from the outset.

 

This is not a bare bones testnet thrown into the wild. It is being launched with a fairly complete infrastructure stack.

 

The company is also rolling out developer documentation and encouraging builders to start experimenting immediately.

 

 

The Exchange Layer 2 Trend

Robinhood joins a growing list of exchanges and fintech firms launching their own Ethereum layer 2 networks.

 

Coinbase operates Base. Kraken is developing its own network. Other trading platforms are exploring similar strategies.

 

The rationale is not complicated. If tokenized assets and onchain trading grow, exchanges would prefer that activity to happen on networks they influence, rather than on third party chains. Controlling infrastructure can mean more flexibility in product design, fee structures, and integration with existing platforms.

 

For Robinhood, which already serves millions of retail users, owning a layer 2 could tighten the loop between its app, its wallet, and onchain markets.

 

 

Testnet Today, Mainnet Later

Right now, Robinhood Chain is in public testnet. Developers can deploy contracts, test integrations, and experiment with wallet flows, including direct testing with Robinhood Wallet. No production assets are live yet.

 

To drive activity, Robinhood is backing developer engagement with hackathons and incentives, including a seven figure prize pool aimed at financial applications built on the network.

 

A mainnet launch is expected later this year, though exact timing has not been pinned down publicly. Technical stability and regulatory comfort will likely dictate the pace.

 

 

The Bottom Line

Robinhood Chain is a signal that tokenized finance is not just a side project for major platforms anymore.

 

If tokenized equities become widely accepted, infrastructure will matter as much as distribution. Robinhood already has distribution through its app. Now it is trying to build the rails underneath.

 

There are open questions. Will regulators in the US allow meaningful onchain trading of tokenized securities? Will liquidity concentrate on exchange backed layer 2s or on more neutral networks? Will users care which chain their tokenized stock sits on?

 

For now, Robinhood has made its position clear. It wants to be more than a broker. It wants to operate the blockchain layer where digital versions of traditional assets trade and settle.

 

The testnet is the first real step in that direction.

 

Nearly a decade after one of crypto’s most painful episodes, a large pool of forgotten Ether tied to TheDAO is being put back to work. This time, not as a risky experiment, but as a long-term security fund for Ethereum.

 

Roughly $220 million worth of ETH that has sat unclaimed since the infamous 2016 DAO hack is being transformed into a new, ecosystem-wide security endowment. The goal is simple on paper: fund audits, tools, research, and emergency response efforts that help keep Ethereum and its users safe. 

 

From Crisis to Capital

To understand why this matters, you have to go back to TheDAO itself.

 

In early 2016, TheDAO was pitched as a radical idea. A decentralized venture fund governed entirely by code and token holders. It quickly became the biggest crowdfunding event crypto had ever seen, pulling in millions of Ether from participants around the world.

 

Then it broke.

 

A flaw in the smart contract allowed an attacker to drain a massive portion of the funds. Panic followed. Debates erupted. And eventually, Ethereum hard-forked to reverse the damage, a decision that permanently split the network and created Ethereum Classic.

 

What was left behind were fragments of that original system. Contracts that never got emptied. ETH that was never claimed. Funds that, for years, were largely ignored.

 

Now they are coming back into focus.

 

Where the Money Comes From

The new security fund is built from two main pools of ETH left over from TheDAO era.

 

The largest portion comes from what is known as the ExtraBalance contract. This Ether was left behind during the original refund process, largely due to overpayments and technical quirks. Today, that balance adds up to more than 70,000 ETH, worth over $200 million at current prices.

 

Most of that ETH will not be spent outright. Instead, the majority is expected to be staked, generating yield that can fund security work year after year. That turns a one-time windfall into something closer to an endowment.

 

The second pool is smaller but more immediately usable. Around 4,600 ETH sits in old curator-related wallets connected to TheDAO. Those funds are expected to be deployed more directly toward grants and security initiatives.

 

Together, they form one of the largest dedicated security funds the Ethereum ecosystem has ever seen.

 

What the Fund Will Actually Do

Ethereum has no shortage of capital, but security spending has often been fragmented. This fund is meant to change that.

 

The focus is broad by design. Audits for major protocols. Funding for security tooling and infrastructure. Support for incident response teams when exploits happen. Research into emerging risks across layer 2 networks, wallets, and user-facing applications.

 

There is also an emphasis on user protection, things like phishing detection, transaction safety tools, and services that help everyday users avoid costly mistakes.

 

Some of the money will likely go to well-known security firms. Some will go to smaller, community-driven projects that quietly do important work but struggle to secure consistent funding.

 

Governance, DAO-Style

In a nod to TheDAO’s original vision, the fund will not operate like a traditional foundation grant program.

 

Instead, distribution is expected to lean heavily on decentralized governance mechanisms. Quadratic funding, retroactive grants, and community voting will all play a role. The idea is to reward impact, not just proposals, and to let a broad set of stakeholders help decide where the money goes.

 

The Ethereum Foundation will still be involved, particularly in setting guardrails and defining what qualifies as security work. But the ambition is to keep decision-making as open and participatory as possible.

 

Why This Matters Now

Ethereum is no longer an experimental network. It secures hundreds of billions of dollars in value across DeFi, NFTs, stablecoins, and layer 2 systems. With that scale comes constant pressure from attackers.

 

Exploits today are faster, more complex, and often more damaging. At the same time, public funding for security work tends to lag behind growth. This fund helps close that gap.

 

It also reflects a broader shift in how the Ethereum community thinks about risk. Security is no longer something you bolt on at the end. It is infrastructure.

 

The Bottom Line

There is something poetic about this moment. I love how they are taking one of Ethereum's darkest moments and turning it in to a security fund to try to ensure that something like this would never happen again.

 

TheDAO hack forced Ethereum to confront its own limits

 

It exposed the dangers of unaudited code and untested governance. It shaped how the ecosystem thinks about security to this day.

 

Turning the remnants of that failure into a permanent security fund feels like closing a loop. A way of acknowledging the past without being defined by it.

 

If the fund works as intended, one of crypto’s earliest disasters may end up funding its future resilience.

 

The walls between Wall Street and the "Wild West" of digital assets just got a little thinner.

 

Charles Schwab, the stalwart of retail investing, has officially signaled its intent to join the spot crypto trading fray.

 

CEO Rick Wurster confirmed on Yahoo Finance’s Opening Bid podcast that Schwab plans to roll out spot Bitcoin and Ethereum trading within the next 12 months. The rollout will debut on their high-octane Thinkorswim platform before migrating to the standard Schwab.com and mobile interfaces.

 

The Strategy: Blue Chips Only

While platforms like Robinhood or Coinbase often lean into the viral chaos of "meme coins," Schwab is taking a predictably measured approach. Wurster made it clear that the firm isn't interested in the speculative frenzy of the latest Shiba Inu derivative.

 

"Those are areas we will leave to the side," Wurster stated, emphasizing that Schwab’s focus remains on "everyday investors" looking to integrate crypto into a diversified, long-term portfolio.

 

A Shifting Regulatory Tide

Schwab isn't acting in a vacuum. The move comes as the regulatory environment in Washington undergoes a massive vibe shift. Since the Trump administration took office, the SEC has pivoted from its previously aggressive "regulation by enforcement" stance.

 

With the swearing-in of the pro-crypto Paul Atkins as SEC Chair—replacing the crypto-skeptic Gary Gensler—lawsuits against major exchanges have been dropped, and restrictive accounting rules for banks holding crypto have been scrapped. Morgan Stanley is reportedly following a similar blueprint, with eyes on adding spot trading to E*Trade by 2026.

 

Ty’s Take: The View from the New Guy

As someone who is relatively new to the financial industry, watching this unfold feels like seeing a massive cruise ship finally decide to change course. For years, the "old guard" of finance treated crypto like a radioactive hobby. Now, they're laying out the red carpet.

 

My honest opinion? This is the "Adults in the Room" moment for crypto.

 

I think Schwab’s decision to avoid meme coins is a brilliant move for their brand. It tells their clients: "We aren't here to help you gamble; we're here to help you invest." For a guy like me, seeing these legacy institutions provide a regulated, familiar bridge to Bitcoin makes the space feel less like a casino and more like a legitimate asset class.

 

However, there’s a catch. Part of me wonders if Schwab is a little late to the party. By the time they launch, many retail investors may have already set up shop elsewhere. But if there’s one thing I’ve learned in my short time here, it’s that you never bet against the convenience of having all your money—stocks, bonds, and now crypto—under one roof.

 

The "crypto winter" is officially over, and the thaw is being led by the very people who once told us to stay away. It’s an exciting time to be entering the industry, even if it means I have a lot more homework to do on blockchain tech.