Nakamoto, a Bitcoin treasury company listed on the Nasdaq, recently announced the details of its Bitcoin derivatives program, a program designed to generate recurring volatility income from a defined portion of Nakamoto’s Bitcoin holdings while hedging some portion of the company’s downside exposure to Bitcoin price risk.

 

While the Bitcoin derivatives program had already begun in the first quarter of the year, Nakamoto will be partnering with Bitwise Asset Management and the crypto exchange Kraken, with Bitwise running the derivatives strategy and Kraken offering its custody solution that will hold a portion of Nakamoto’s Bitcoin holdings that will be used for the derivatives program.

 

The derivatives program, according to Nakamoto, is aimed at achieving two main objectives: (1) monetizing Bitcoin volatility and (2) mitigating downside risk.

 

By systematically writing covered calls and call spreads against a portion of its Bitcoin holdings, Nakamoto’s Bitcoin derivatives program aims to convert the volatility in the Bitcoin options market into recurring income, which the company says can be reinvested into its Bitcoin treasury or used for its everyday operational costs.

 

The program also aims to mitigate downside risk due to a decline in the Bitcoin price by maintaining a defined allocation of Nakamoto’s Bitcoin holdings to protective puts and put spreads, supporting the stability of Nakamoto’s net asset value and reducing the risk of forced deleveraging, especially during stressed market conditions.

 

"Bitcoin's implied volatility is one of the most persistently mispriced assets in capital markets," said Tyler Evans, chief investment officer of Nakamoto and UTXO Management.

 

"Working with institutional grade partners like Bitwise and Kraken, we have built a disciplined framework to harvest that premium systematically, at scale, and convert that opportunity into long term value for shareholders. This program is just one component of a broader effort to identify and execute on opportunities to generate yield on our Bitcoin holdings."

 

Nakamoto as a Bitcoin Treasury Company

Nakamoto Inc is a publicly traded company that operates a Bitcoin treasury strategy as its core business. The company currently holds approximately 5,342 BTC on its balance sheet, valued at roughly $467.5 million.

 

It made its first major Bitcoin purchase in August 2025 when it purchased 5,743.91 BTC worth approximately $679 million through its subsidiary Nakamoto Holdings. However, it recently sold 284 BTC for $20 million last month, with the proceeds used to support its working capital and fund its business operations.

 

 

Bitnomial, the Chicago based cryptocurrency exchange, has launched the first Injective (INJ) futures contracts in the United States, regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

 

Although access is currently limited to institutional clients, with retail traders expected to gain access in the future, the newly launched INJ futures contracts allow users to gain exposure to the Injective Protocol underlying INJ token without directly holding it.

 

 

The futures contracts settle in INJ with monthly expiries. This means that while the INJ futures contracts are tradable on the Bitnomial exchange, each contract has an expiry date. When this date is reached each month, the contract expires and settles.

 

The INJ futures contracts can also be margined in crypto or United States dollars, which means traders can choose to deposit either United States dollars or other supported cryptocurrencies as collateral when they open and maintain leveraged positions on the Bitnomial platform.

 

The launch of the Injective INJ futures contracts is one of several futures contract launches by Bitnomial this year, with the exchange having launched XRP futures contracts last month and Tezos and Aptos futures contracts earlier in the year.

 

What the Injective Protocol is

The Injective protocol is a high performance layer 1 blockchain built for decentralized finance DeFi and other advanced financial applications. The Injective chain was built to support complex blockchain infrastructures such as decentralized exchanges DEXs, derivatives trading, perpetual futures, spot markets, prediction markets, lending, and real world assets RWAs.

 

Since its launch, several blockchain protocols have been built on the Injective chain, including Helix, a decentralized exchange, DojoSwap, an automated market maker, and Astroport.

 

Kraken in Deal to Acquire Bitnomial

In its latest acquisition move, Payward, the parent company of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, has agreed to acquire Bitnomial for 550 million dollars in a deal expected to close before the end of the quarter.

 

 

Through this acquisition, Kraken aims to establish a fully vertically integrated United States crypto derivatives platform under full Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulation. The acquisition is intended to help Kraken accelerate the development of its derivatives business in the United States.

 

Bitnomial’s strong regulatory framework and compliance structure are among the factors influencing the deal. The company operates a Designated Contract Market, a Derivatives Clearing Organization, and a Futures Commission Merchant that supports its brokerage services.

 

Since Bitnomial already has these infrastructures in place, its acquisition is expected to be pivotal for Kraken in advancing its derivatives exchange objectives.

 

 

Hyperliquid's RWA trading just hit a new all time high, with open interest crossing $2.3 billion on its blockchain which says a lot about how much liquidity is actually flowing into real world assets through a decentralized venue. The platform has quietly become a go-to spot for trading, building apps, and launching tokens all in one place, and the RWA growth is starting to grow rapidly. It’s fees are competing with top blockchains and stable coin companies within crypto.

 

 

On March 31, Cointelegraph reported that Ripple Prime expanded its Hyperliquid integration with HIP-3. That means institutions now get seamless on-chain perpetuals on traditional assets like gold, silver, oil, and even compute prices.

 

This is the kind of bridge that allows retail to hedge oil exposure at 3 a.m on a Sunday when traditional futures are closed. The same rails powering crypto perps now handle real-world commodities that move markets worldwide. It's infrastructure that pulls capital on-chain because the UX finally matches what people expect from a modern trading venue.

 

On the prime brokerage side, a traditional S&P futures trade runs through six different entities: prime broker, FCM, CME Clearing, and so on with multiple fee layers, T+1 settlement, financing charges, and all the custody overhead that comes with it. On HIP-3, connect your wallet, post USDC margin, trade the perp, and settle instantly on-chain. One fee, self-custody, the smart contract is the clearinghouse, and the blockchain handles custody. It's making large chunks of what they actually do look pretty unnecessary, once the regulatory picture clears up. 

 

Hyperliquid's terms of service explicitly block US users, and enforce this with IP geoblocking, so if you're in the States you'll hit a wall at app.hyperliquid.xyz. The underlying protocol is fully permissionless since it's non-custodial and requires no KYC, but using it from the US still carries real regulatory risk given the CFTC's jurisdiction over leveraged perps. In February 2026 they launched a $29 million Policy Center in D.C. led by Jake Chervinsky, pushing for regulatory clarity around on-chain derivatives. Until something like the CLARITY Act or formal CFTC guidance moves things forward, the restriction is basically the protocol protecting itself while it keeps running 24/7 for the rest of the world. For US builders and investors, the play is watching that policy push closely because when the rails open, the infrastructure is already battle tested and ready to go.

 

Non-crypto assets on Hyperliquid with HIP-3 markets now cover licensed indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, individual equities, commodities, and even compute perps tied to GPU rental rates for H100, H200, and A100 chips through projects like Global Compute Index and Hyperbolic. At peak moments these non-crypto pairs have accounted for up to 45% of total volume, with HIP-3 open interest recently sitting around $1.9 billion.

 

Late last year, Aster looked like it could replace Hyperliquid with BNB Chain speed, incentives, and early buzz that some called the “Hyperliquid killer.” Hyperliquid has pulled ahead in TVL, open interest, fees, and real value returned to holders. Aster remains solid, yet Hyperliquid’s dedicated L1 edge with tighter spreads, deeper books, and consistent performance has widened the gap.

 

 

@CosimoCapital posted a thread making a pretty compelling case for why a future proposal of HIP-4 prediction markets could be a serious unlock. The core problem with most prediction market platforms is thin liquidity and parlays that just don't work because every market is isolated from everything else. Hyperliquid flips that by letting prediction markets tap into the same infrastructure already handling massive perpetuals and commodities volume. "When prediction markets share a unified liquidity pool with perpetual markets," Cosimo wrote, "the parlay math transforms completely." One account, cross-margined across oil perps, equity moves, and event outcomes, all settling instantly. It's not just another betting app. It could end up being "the everything market for global event risk."

 

 

This opens up some genuinely interesting scenarios with macro hedges like "if CPI beats and the Fed holds and BTC closes green," or geopolitical risk desks chaining election outcomes to commodity moves, parametric insurance, treasury automation, you name it. Every multi-leg position multiplies fee events too, so five legs means five burns, which turns HIP-4 volume into structural HYPE supply reduction over time. Hyperliquid is pulling in roughly $700 million in annualized trading fees from its perpetuals and spot markets, and around 97 to 99% of it flows automatically into the Assistance Fund, which runs daily HYPE buybacks on a continuous basis. There's constant structural demand and deflationary pressure on circulating supply whether the market is up, down, or sideways.

 

And yet CEXs still dominate headlines, but Hyperliquid delivers the speed and depth traders love as everything is transparent, on-chain, and runs non-stop. For builders shipping interoperability tools, this is the tool that makes cross-border and cross-asset trading feel native.

 

Hyperliquid is quietly becoming a 24/7 venue where crypto-native capital meets macro and physical assets without intermediaries. The current restriction is more about protecting the protocol long term than anything else, and the policy push happening in DC is very much part of the plan. Once clarity comes, the floodgates will open and give a much needed update to trading.

 

 

Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase has secured the Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Australia’s main financial regulator, expanding its services beyond cryptocurrencies.

 

With the AFSL license secured, Coinbase Australia Pty Ltd, the exchange’s Australian entity, will be the first cryptocurrency exchange in Australia to offer non-crypto retail derivatives.

 

 

According to John O'Loghlen, the regional managing director for APAC and Australia country director at Coinbase, the expansion will begin with Coinbase offering crypto and equity perpetuals to its Australian users, followed by future expansion into futures, options, and stock trading, all of which will be made available through the Coinbase Wallet app.

 

With this planned expansion, Coinbase will be competing directly with traditional finance companies already offering these non-crypto derivatives, including IG Markets, CMC Markets, and Pepperstone, which serve hundreds of thousands of users. Nevertheless, according to O'Loghlen, Coinbase will be leveraging the speed and execution advantages of crypto.

 

Review of Coinbase Activity in Australia

Since its entry into the Australian crypto market in 2016, Coinbase has performed fairly well, particularly given that Australia is known for high cryptocurrency adoption, with about 33 percent of Australians reportedly having been exposed to cryptocurrencies.

 

In 2022, Coinbase expanded from offering basic crypto services to establishing a local Australian entity, Coinbase Australia Pty Ltd, which was registered with the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Center, AUSTRAC, Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing regulator and financial intelligence agency.

 

Through its Australian entity, headed by John O’Loghlen, Coinbase began offering PayID support for fast Australian dollar transfers, advanced trading features, and round-the-clock local customer support for its Australian users.

 

Coinbase’s journey in the Australian crypto sector has also been relatively smooth from a regulatory perspective, as it has not faced any major legal or regulatory challenges from Australian regulators, despite the country’s strict crypto enforcement actions and penalties imposed on compliance violators.

 

 

Bitcoin climbed back toward the $72,000 mark Wednesday as the derivatives market showed telltale signs of growing leverage, putting traders on alert for sharp moves in either direction. The world's largest cryptocurrency rose roughly 1.2% after midnight UTC, mirroring gains across U.S. equity futures, with the Nasdaq 100 up around 1% over the same window. BTC was last seen trading near $71,300, well within the choppy $69,000 to $76,000 band that has defined the market for much of March.

 

The session's gains carried a cautionary undertone. Futures open interest in bitcoin has climbed to a one-week high, driven in large part by short positioning rather than fresh bullish conviction. Traders who have seen BTC get turned away from $72,000 repeatedly appear to be leaning into those rejections rather than chasing a breakout. Funding rates and cumulative volume delta have stayed flat to muted, two readings that analysts typically cite when the OI build is defensive in nature rather than a signal of aggressive dip-buying.

 

$14 Billion Options Expiry Looms Large

The backdrop sharpens considerably when you factor in what is sitting on the calendar for Friday. Deribit, the dominant crypto options venue, is set to settle roughly $14.16 billion in bitcoin contracts at 08:00 UTC on March 27, a figure that accounts for nearly 40% of all open interest on the exchange. The quarterly event is the single largest derivatives settlement of Q1 2026, and it arrives with a specific price level commanding outsized attention.

 

That level is $75,000. According to Deribit, max pain for this Friday's expiry sits right there, meaning it is the price at which the highest number of contracts expire worthless and option writers, typically large funds and institutional players, would owe the least. Deribit Chief Commercial Officer Jean-David Pequignot described the dynamic as a gravitational pull, noting that delta-hedging activity by market makers historically nudges spot prices toward that pain threshold in the hours leading up to settlement.

 

The gap between where bitcoin is trading now and $75,000 is not trivial, a roughly 5% move from current levels. Whether max pain theory ultimately delivers on that gravitational pull remains a matter of debate even inside the industry. But with nearly 40% of Deribit's open interest scheduled to roll off in one session, the mechanical hedging flows alone are worth watching closely.

 

Altcoins Showing Stronger Positioning

While Bitcoin grinds sideways with mounting leverage, a more constructive picture is forming in parts of the altcoin market. Ethereum open interest has climbed to multi-month highs, and the positioning profile looks more directionally bullish than what is currently visible in BTC futures. DeFi-adjacent tokens and AI infrastructure projects are outperforming Bitcoin on a short-term basis, with the CoinDesk Computing Select Index, which tracks TAO, FET, and Chainlink, rising about 1.9% Wednesday to lead all major benchmarks.

 

Chainlink alone accounts for roughly 62% of that index and added 1.5% on the day, while TAO and FET posted gains of 4.9% and 2.9% respectively. The broader CoinDesk 20 benchmark gained around 0.9%, with the altcoin-heavy CoinDesk 80 generally outpacing the bitcoin-heavy CoinDesk 5. The pattern suggests that risk appetite has not evaporated, it is simply migrating toward names where there is clearer near-term narrative momentum.

 

A Market Trapped Between Catalysts

Zoom out and the picture gets harder to trade comfortably. Bitcoin is on pace to close March in the red, which would extend a losing or flat monthly streak to six consecutive months, the longest such run since the 2022 bear market. The final week of the month carries several potential catalysts, including the U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditures data on March 28, which could shift rate-cut expectations and send ripples through risk assets.

 

For now, the market appears to be threading a needle between a derivatives setup that could pull prices higher ahead of Friday and a macro backdrop that has not yet given bulls a clean reason to push through resistance with conviction. Rising open interest without corresponding spot demand and funding is historically the kind of configuration that resolves violently, though the direction is rarely obvious until it starts moving. With $14 billion in contracts settling in roughly 48 hours, the next few sessions aren't looking to be very quiet.

 

CME Group, the world’s largest derivatives exchange, is exploring the idea of issuing its own digital token, a move that signals how far traditional market infrastructure has come in its engagement with blockchain technology.

 

The idea, casually referred to as a “CME Coin,” was raised by CME Group CEO Terry Duffy during a recent earnings call. While still early and undefined, the concept centers on using a proprietary digital asset within CME’s own ecosystem, potentially for collateral, margin, or settlement purposes.

 

This is not about launching a new retail cryptocurrency or competing with bitcoin or ether. Instead, it is about modernizing the technology that supports global derivatives markets, a space where CME plays a critical role.

 

 

What CME Is Actually Exploring

Duffy described the initiative as part of an ongoing review into tokenization and digital asset infrastructure. He suggested that CME is evaluating whether issuing a token that operates on a decentralized network could improve how collateral moves between participants in cleared markets.

 

Details remain scarce. CME has not confirmed whether such a token would be structured as a stablecoin, a settlement asset, or a more limited utility token designed solely for institutional use. The company has also declined to share any timeline or technical framework.

 

Still, the fact that CME is openly discussing the idea is notable. As a systemically important market operator, CME tends to move cautiously, especially when it comes to new financial instruments that intersect with regulation.

 

 

Why Collateral Is the Real Story

The potential importance of a CME-issued token lies in collateral and margin, not payments or speculation.

 

Every day, CME clears massive volumes of derivatives tied to interest rates, foreign exchange, commodities, equities, and cryptocurrencies. These markets rely on collateral to manage risk, and moving that collateral efficiently is a constant operational challenge.

 

Today, most collateral still moves through traditional banking rails, with settlement delays, cut-off times, and operational friction baked in. Tokenized collateral could allow assets to move almost instantly, potentially on a 24-hour basis, while remaining within a regulated framework.

 

That makes a CME Coin fundamentally different from most stablecoins. Its value would not come from being widely traded or used for payments, but from being embedded directly into the risk management systems of institutional markets.

 

Some industry observers argue that a token used in this way could ultimately matter more to financial infrastructure than consumer-facing digital currencies, simply because of the scale and importance of the markets involved.

 

 

Tokenization Without Giving Up Control

Importantly, CME is not signaling any desire to decentralize its role as a central counterparty. The exchange’s interest in tokenization appears focused on efficiency, not ideology.

 

Any CME-issued token would almost certainly operate within a tightly controlled environment, designed to meet regulatory expectations and preserve CME’s oversight of clearing and settlement. In that sense, it reflects a broader trend among traditional financial institutions that are adopting blockchain technology while maintaining centralized governance.

 

The token discussion fits neatly into CME Group’s expanding crypto footprint.

 

CME already offers regulated futures and options on Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. It has also announced plans to introduce futures tied to Cardano, Chainlink, and Stellar, pending regulatory approval.

 

These products have positioned CME as one of the main gateways for institutional crypto exposure in the U.S. market. Unlike offshore exchanges or crypto-native platforms, CME’s offerings are deeply embedded in traditional financial workflows, making them attractive to banks, hedge funds, and asset managers.

 

CME is also planning to expand trading hours for its bitcoin and ether futures to a 24/7 model, reflecting the always-on nature of crypto markets and growing demand from global participants.

 

Separate from the CME Coin idea, CME is working with Google Cloud on a tokenized cash initiative expected to roll out later this year. That project involves a depository bank and is focused on settlement and payments between institutional counterparties.

 

Taken together, these efforts suggest CME is methodically experimenting with how tokenized money and assets can fit into regulated financial infrastructure, rather than making a single, headline-grabbing bet.

 

 

A Familiar Pattern for CME

This is not CME’s first cautious step into crypto.

 

When the exchange launched bitcoin futures in 2017, it marked one of the first major points of contact between regulated derivatives markets and digital assets. That move helped legitimize bitcoin as a tradable asset class for institutions, even as skepticism remained high.

 

Today’s exploration of tokenization follows a similar pattern. CME is not chasing hype. It is watching where market structure could benefit from new technology and testing whether blockchain-based tools can solve real operational problems.

 

 

Regulatory Questions Still Loom

Any move toward issuing a proprietary token would inevitably draw scrutiny from regulators, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and potentially banking authorities depending on how the asset is structured.

 

Questions around custody, settlement finality, and classification would all need to be addressed before anything goes live. CME’s history suggests it will not move forward without regulatory clarity, even if that slows progress.

 

 

The Bottom Line

For now, the CME Coin remains an idea rather than a product. But the fact that it is being discussed at the CEO level underscores how seriously traditional market operators are taking tokenization.

 

If CME ultimately moves forward, it could reshape how collateral works in cleared markets and accelerate the adoption of blockchain technology at the core of global finance.

 

For an industry that once viewed crypto as a fringe experiment, this type of move is very telling. 

 

 

Crypto.com is leaning harder into prediction markets, and it is doing so with a clear message: this is no longer a side experiment.

 

The exchange has launched OG, a standalone prediction markets app that pulls event trading out of the main Crypto.com platform and gives it its own dedicated product. The move comes at a moment when prediction markets are not just growing, but accelerating, driven by sports, politics, and a broader appetite for trading real-world outcomes.

 

For Crypto.com, spinning prediction markets into their own app is a signal that this category is starting to matter in a way it did not before.

 

 

Why Crypto.com Is Breaking Prediction Markets Out on Their Own

OG focuses on event contracts that allow users to trade on the outcome of future events, starting with high-profile sports like the Super Bowl. Over time, the company says it plans to expand into financial events, politics, entertainment, and culture.

 

What sets OG apart from many crypto-native prediction platforms is its regulatory structure. The contracts are offered through Crypto.com’s U.S. derivatives arm, which operates under federal oversight. That positioning allows Crypto.com to frame prediction markets as regulated financial products rather than gambling, a distinction that has become increasingly important in the U.S.

 

There is also a product reason for the separation. Prediction markets behave differently than spot crypto trading. They move faster, they are driven by opinion and information flow, and they tend to be more social by nature. OG leans into that with features like leaderboards and community-style engagement, along with aggressive incentives aimed at onboarding early users.

 

Crypto.com has used that playbook before, and it is betting it works again here.

 

 

Prediction Markets Are Booming

Prediction markets are seeing record activity across the industry. Recent data shows combined monthly trading volume on leading platforms Kalshi and Polymarket has climbed for six straight months, rising from roughly $2 billion last August to nearly $17.5 billion in January.

 

That growth has been fueled by a mix of major sports events, political cycles, and growing interest in markets that reflect real-world probabilities rather than token price action. For many users, trading on whether something will happen feels more intuitive than trading whether a coin will go up or down.

 

Sports, in particular, have become an entry point. They are familiar, emotionally charged, and easy to understand. From there, users often branch into macroeconomic events, policy decisions, and cultural moments that attract attention well beyond crypto.

 

 

How Event Trading Actually Works

At its core, prediction markets allow users to buy and sell positions tied to whether an event happens or not. Prices move based on collective belief. A contract trading at 65 cents implies the market sees about a 65 percent chance of that outcome occurring.

 

As new information enters the market, whether it is an injury report, polling data, or an economic release, prices adjust in real time.

 

In regulated environments, these contracts are treated as derivatives. That classification is what allows companies like Crypto.com to operate nationally, rather than navigating a patchwork of state-level gambling rules. It is also what opens the door, at least in theory, to more advanced features like leverage and margin trading on event outcomes.

 

Crypto.com has signaled interest in going down that path, pending regulatory approval.

 

 

Regulation Is Becoming the Real Battleground

As prediction markets grow, regulation has become the defining line between platforms.

 

Some operate entirely outside the U.S. framework, relying on crypto-native liquidity and offshore structures. Others are betting that long-term scale depends on regulatory clarity, even if that means slower iteration and tighter constraints.

 

Crypto.com has clearly chosen the second route. By anchoring OG to a federally regulated derivatives entity, the company gains credibility with regulators and institutions, and potentially access to a much larger user base.

 

That does not eliminate risk. Legal interpretations continue to evolve, and prediction markets still sit in an uncomfortable gray area between finance and betting. But for now, regulation looks less like a constraint and more like a competitive advantage.

 

Kalshi and Polymarket have established themselves as leaders, particularly around political and macro events. Other major exchanges are watching closely, and in some cases preparing their own entries. Prediction markets offer something many crypto products struggle with: relevance to people who do not care about crypto prices.

 

Crypto.com’s advantage is distribution. The company already knows how to onboard millions of users through mobile-first products, and OG is clearly designed to plug into that existing funnel.

 

Whether that is enough to stand out in this crowded field remains an open question.

 

 

The Bottom Line

Prediction markets have moved out of the margins and into the center of the crypto conversation.

 

Crypto.com’s launch of OG reflects a broader shift in how exchanges are thinking about growth. Not everything needs to revolve around tokens. Not every product needs to look like a traditional exchange. The fact that Crypto.com has a huge user base as an traditional exchange definitely makes this latest move smart, and it is certainly following the trend of exchanges becoming more than just a place to buy and sell. They are beginning to offer a full suite of products for an ever-growing customer base.

 

By turning real-world events into tradable markets, prediction platforms tap directly into attention, opinion, and information flow. If OG succeeds, it could help push prediction markets...and Crypto.com even more in to the mainstream.

 

When Michael Selig stepped into the role of CFTC chair late last year, the crypto industry was already expecting a change in tone. This week, it got confirmation.

 

On January 20, Selig announced the launch of the CFTC’s new “Future-Proof” initiative, a program designed to rethink how U.S. markets regulate crypto, digital assets, and other fast-moving financial technologies. The message was clear. The old approach is no longer enough.

 

Rather than relying on enforcement actions and retroactive interpretations of decades-old rules, the CFTC wants to build regulatory frameworks that actually reflect how these markets function today.

 

For an industry that has spent years navigating uncertainty, that alone is a notable shift.

 

A Chair With Deep Crypto Roots

Selig is not new to crypto regulation. Before taking the top job at the CFTC, he worked closely with digital asset policy at the SEC and spent time in private practice advising both traditional financial firms and crypto companies. He also previously clerked at the CFTC, giving him an unusually well-rounded view of how regulators and markets interact.

 

That background shows up in his public comments. Since taking office, Selig has repeatedly emphasized predictability, clarity, and rules that market participants can actually follow without guessing how an agency might interpret them years later.

 

The Future-Proof initiative is the clearest expression of that philosophy so far.

 

What “Future-Proof” Really Means

At its core, Future-Proof is about moving away from improvisation. The CFTC wants to stop forcing novel digital products into regulatory boxes built for traditional derivatives and commodities.

 

Instead, the agency plans to pursue purpose-built rules through formal notice-and-comment processes. That means more upfront guidance and fewer surprises delivered through enforcement actions.

 

Selig has described the goal as applying the minimum effective level of regulation. Enough oversight to protect markets and participants, but not so much that innovation is choked off before it has a chance to mature.

 

For crypto firms, that approach could offer something they have long asked for but rarely received, which is regulatory certainty.

 

Why the Industry Is Paying Attention

The timing matters. Crypto markets are more institutional than they were even a few years ago. Large asset managers, trading firms, and infrastructure providers want clearer rules before committing serious capital. Uncertainty around jurisdiction and compliance has been one of the biggest obstacles.

 

If the CFTC follows through, Future-Proof could help define how derivatives, spot markets, and emerging products like prediction markets are treated under U.S. law. That would make it easier for firms to build, invest, and operate without constantly second-guessing regulators.

 

At the same time, clarity cuts both ways. More defined rules could also raise the bar for compliance, especially for smaller startups and decentralized platforms that have operated in legal gray zones.

 

 

Tennessee Attempts to Block Prediction Markets

 

 

A Broader Political Shift

Selig’s initiative does not exist in isolation. It comes as lawmakers in Washington continue debating how to split crypto oversight between the CFTC and the SEC. Several proposed bills aim to draw clearer lines around digital commodities and spot market regulation, potentially expanding the CFTC’s role.

 

Future-Proof appears designed to fit neatly into that broader push. If Congress hands the agency more authority, the CFTC wants to be ready with frameworks that can scale.

 

Still, challenges remain. The commission currently lacks a full slate of confirmed commissioners, raising questions about how durable these policy shifts will be. Coordination with the SEC is another open issue, especially where token classifications blur the line between securities and commodities.

 

What Does The Future Hold?

For now, Future-Proof is more direction than destination. The real test will be how quickly the CFTC turns principles into actual rules, and whether those rules survive political change and legal scrutiny.

 

But the tone alone represents a meaningful break from the past. After years of regulation by enforcement and ambiguity, the agency is signaling that crypto markets are not a temporary problem to be contained, but a permanent part of the financial system that deserves thoughtful governance.

 

Whether that vision becomes reality will shape the next phase of U.S. crypto regulation, and potentially determine whether innovation stays onshore or continues looking elsewhere.

 

 

 

Tennessee Orders Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com to Halt Sports Prediction Contracts

 

Tennessee regulators have ordered Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com to immediately stop offering sports-related prediction contracts to residents of the state, escalating a growing conflict between state gambling authorities and federally regulated prediction markets.

The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council issued cease-and-desist orders on January 9, demanding that the three platforms halt all sports event contracts, void any open positions tied to Tennessee users, and refund customer funds by the end of the month.

State officials argue the products function as unlicensed sports betting under Tennessee law, regardless of how the companies describe them.

The move places Tennessee alongside a growing list of states pushing back against prediction markets that allow users to trade contracts based on the outcomes of sporting events, elections, or real-world events. While the platforms frame these products as financial instruments, state regulators increasingly see them as gambling by another name.

 

What Tennessee Is Demanding

According to the orders, Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com must immediately cease offering sports contracts to Tennessee residents. Any existing sports-related contracts must be canceled, and all funds deposited by users in the state must be returned by January 31.

Failure to comply could expose the companies to civil penalties, injunctions, and possible criminal enforcement under Tennessee’s sports gaming laws.

The council’s position is straightforward. If money is being risked on the outcome of a sporting event, the state considers it sports wagering, which requires a license, tax payments, and adherence to consumer protection rules.

 

The Regulatory Fault Line

At the heart of the dispute is a long-running jurisdictional battle between state gambling regulators and the federal framework governing derivatives and commodities trading.

Kalshi and Polymarket operate under federal oversight tied to commodities regulation, and Crypto.com has positioned its event contracts as a similar financial product. The companies argue that their platforms fall outside traditional sports betting laws and should be regulated at the federal level.

Tennessee, like several other states, rejects that argument. State officials maintain that federal oversight does not override state authority when it comes to gambling conducted within state borders.

This disagreement has become one of the most contentious regulatory issues facing crypto-adjacent markets in the U.S.

 

A Pattern Across the States

Tennessee’s action is not an isolated case. Over the past year, multiple states have issued warnings or cease-and-desist orders targeting prediction markets tied to sports outcomes. Recently, Coinbase filed suit against Connecticut, Michigan, and Illinois. Those states argue that Coinbase's prediction markets amount to illegal gambling and are attempting to ban them there.

Gaming regulators in states such as Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland, Ohio, and Illinois have raised similar concerns, arguing that prediction markets undermine state-regulated sports betting ecosystems while avoiding licensing requirements and taxes.

In some cases, platforms have pulled back voluntarily. In others, companies have opted to fight.

Kalshi has already challenged similar enforcement actions in court, arguing that state gambling laws are being improperly applied to federally regulated markets. The outcome of those cases could shape the future of prediction markets nationwide.

 

Why States Are Pushing Back Now

State regulators say the issue is not just about definitions, but about consumer protection and regulatory consistency.

Licensed sportsbooks are required to meet strict standards related to age verification, responsible gambling tools, fund segregation, and auditing. States argue that prediction markets offering sports contracts operate outside those guardrails while competing for the same customers.

There is also growing concern that prediction markets blur the line between financial trading and gambling in ways existing laws were never designed to address.

For regulators, allowing these products to operate unchecked could weaken the authority of state gaming frameworks that were carefully built following the legalization of sports betting.

 

What Happens Next

The Tennessee order adds new pressure on Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com at a time when prediction markets are expanding rapidly and attracting increased attention from both traders and policymakers.

The companies could comply and exit the state, challenge the order in court, or push for clearer federal guidance that limits states’ ability to intervene.

Until that happens, the industry remains stuck in a regulatory gray zone, where legality depends less on federal approval and more on how individual states choose to interpret decades-old gambling laws.

 

For crypto-linked prediction markets, Tennessee’s action is another reminder that regulatory risk in the U.S. remains fragmented, unpredictable, and increasingly aggressive.

Coinbase has sued Connecticut, Michigan, and Illinois today, but it does not look like a typical regulatory skirmish. On the surface, it was about a few cease-and-desist orders targeting prediction market contracts. In practice, it put a much bigger question on the table. What exactly are prediction markets supposed to be?

Are they casinos in disguise, digital poker rooms with better UX, or a new kind of financial market that belongs under federal oversight?

The answer matters, because the wrong classification could freeze a fast-growing corner of finance in legal limbo.

 

Why Coinbase Is Taking States to Court

The states argue that Coinbase’s prediction markets amount to illegal gambling. Users put money down on outcomes. Some win, some lose. No state gambling license, no approval.

Coinbase sees it very differently. These contracts, the company argues, are event-based derivatives. They look like futures, trade like futures, and are already subject to federal commodities law. The Chief Legal Officer for Coinbase, Paul Grewal, stated in an X post on Friday that the company filed the lawsuits to "confirm what is clear" and that prediction market should fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

If states are allowed to regulate these markets anyway, the logic goes, national liquidity disappears. A market that works in one state but not another stops being a market at all. But, there are comparisons to existing gambling laws and we broke those down for you.

 

The Casino Comparison Only Goes So Far

State regulators tend to reach for the casino analogy first, and it is easy to see why. There is money at risk. Outcomes are uncertain. The optics are not subtle.

But structurally, prediction markets do not behave like casinos. Casinos set the odds. The house always wins over time. The product is entertainment.

Prediction markets do not work that way. Prices are set by participants. New information moves markets. There is no built-in house edge. The value comes from aggregating beliefs into a number that says something useful about the future.

Calling that gambling because it involves money is a shortcut, and not a very precise one.

 

Poker Explains the Skill Argument, and Its Limits

Poker is the comparison that usually comes next. Courts have spent years debating whether poker is mostly luck or mostly skill. Many have concluded that skill dominates over time, even if chance plays a role in the short run.

Yet poker is still regulated as gambling in most places. Not because it lacks skill, but because the law never quite figured out where else to put it.

That history matters. It shows how activities that clearly reward information and decision-making can still end up trapped in gaming frameworks that were built for something else entirely.

Prediction markets risk repeating that mistake. Like poker, they reward skill. Unlike poker, they are not games. They are continuous markets with prices, liquidity, and arbitrage. Treating them like a card room because money changes hands misses the point.

 

Why Prediction Markets Look Like Futures Markets

If you strip away the cultural baggage, prediction markets start to look familiar. They are standardized contracts tied to future outcomes. Prices reflect probability. Traders respond to data.

That is the same basic logic behind futures contracts tied to interest rates, inflation, or commodities. Those markets involve speculation, risk, and uncertainty too. They are regulated, but they are not treated as gambling.

This is where Coinbase’s argument lands. Congress already created a regulator for markets like this. The CFTC exists to oversee contracts that trade future outcomes, including event-based ones. The fact that an outcome is an election or a policy decision does not change the structure of the market.

 

What Changes If Coinbase Wins

If Coinbase wins, the impact goes well beyond these three states.

First, jurisdiction becomes clearer. States would no longer be able to regulate federally governed prediction markets simply by labeling them gambling. That alone would remove one of the biggest sources of uncertainty hanging over the industry.

Second, the casino argument loses legal weight. Courts would be acknowledging that uncertainty plus money does not automatically equal gambling, especially when prices are discovered through open trading rather than set by an operator.

Third, prediction markets would finally escape the poker problem. They would not sit in a gray zone where skill is recognized but regulation never quite fits. Instead, they would fall under a framework designed for markets, not games.

With that clarity, these markets could scale. Liquidity would deepen. Institutional participants could step in. Contracts tied to economic data, climate outcomes, and corporate milestones could expand without the constant risk of state-level shutdowns.

Over time, prediction markets could start to look less like a regulatory headache and more like infrastructure. Another tool, alongside surveys and models, for figuring out what the world might do next.

 

A Bigger Signal About Regulation

This case is not really about Coinbase. It is about whether U.S. regulation can adapt when finance starts to blur into something new, a question that has stifled digital asset growth for years.

Casinos deal in chance. Poker deals in skill inside a gaming framework. Futures markets deal in information. Prediction markets belong in the third category, even if they make people uncomfortable.

If courts agree, it would send a signal that regulation can still be about function rather than analogy. That is not a radical idea. It is how most financial markets came to exist in the first place. Prediction markets are here to stay. We've seen huge partnerships with major media news outlets and exchanges. The regulatory details need to be clearly defined for this emerging industry.

 

And if that happens, prediction markets may finally stop being debated as gambling, and start being treated as what they have been trying to become all along. Markets that trade in probabilities, under rules built for markets, not casinos.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

Crypto CEOs Join CFTC’s Innovation Council as Market Structure Overhaul Picks Up Speed

Caroline Pham is heading into her final stretch as acting chair of the CFTC, but she is not easing her way out. Instead, she has pulled together a new CEO Innovation Council, bringing in a mix of crypto founders and leaders from major financial institutions. The timing feels intentional. Markets are shifting fast, the technology is shifting even faster, and she clearly wanted this group in place before she hands off the job.

The council itself is an unusual gathering. On one side are Tyler Winklevoss from Gemini, Arjun Sethi from Kraken and Shayne Coplan from Polymarket. On the other, executives from CME Group, Nasdaq, ICE and Cboe. It is not often you see these people sitting on the same advisory panel, let alone one created this quickly. According to the commission, the entire list came together in about two weeks, which says a lot about how much urgency Pham applied.

She thanked the group for agreeing to join so quickly, noting that the commission needs their experience as it tries to prepare for what comes next. The council will focus on the areas where the rulebook is changing as fast as the products themselves. Tokenization. Prediction markets. Perpetual contracts. Crypto collateral. Around the clock trading. Blockchain market plumbing. Basically all the things that traditional derivatives systems were never built to handle.

 

Here is the full list of names:

Shayne Coplan, Polymarket
Craig Donohue, Cboe
Terry Duffy, CME Group
Tom Farley, Bullish
Adena Friedman, Nasdaq
Luke Hoersten, Bitnomial
Tarek Mansour, Kalshi
Kris Marszalek, Crypto.com
David Schwimmer, LSEG
Arjun Sethi, Kraken
Jeff Sprecher, Intercontinental Exchange
Tyler Winklevoss, Gemini

 

All of this is happening as the agency prepares for new leadership. President Trump’s nominee, Mike Selig, is expected to be confirmed soon. When he steps in, he will inherit an agency already deep into crypto policy work that accelerated under Pham. Just this week, the CFTC launched a pilot for using crypto collateral inside derivatives markets. A few days before that, Bitnomial began offering leverage spot crypto trading with her support.

Pham has only been in the acting role for a short time, but she treated crypto as a top priority, pushing several initiatives that line up with the administration’s goal of positioning the United States as a leading hub for digital assets. Over at the SEC, Chairman Paul Atkins has been doing something similar through Project Crypto, which has been absorbing much of the agency’s energy.

 

What comes next will land in Selig’s lap. But with this council now in place, he will walk into a job where the industry and the regulators are already in the middle of a much bigger conversation about what the future of market structure should look like.

Polymarket Secures CFTC Approval, Marking a Landmark Return to the U.S. Regulated Market

Polymarket, one of the most well-known crypto prediction platforms, has officially secured approval from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to operate as a fully regulated exchange in the United States. This milestone represents the end of a long regulatory saga and marks the beginning of a new era for event-based markets in the American financial system.

Once viewed primarily as an offshore curiosity on the fringes of crypto, Polymarket is now entering the most regulated derivatives market in the world with a structure that resembles a traditional exchange. The approval signals a wider shift in how prediction markets are treated, not as gray-area gambling products but as legitimate financial instruments with real informational and economic value.

 

A Long Road Back: From Enforcement Actions to Full Approval

Polymarket’s path to reentry took several years and involved significant regulatory challenges.

In 2022 the CFTC fined the company and required it to shut down operations for U.S. customers. At the time the agency viewed Polymarket as an unregistered derivatives venue, and American users were cut off as the platform relocated offshore. For nearly three years Polymarket operated internationally, mostly in regulatory limbo, even as it grew rapidly.

Everything shifted in 2025. Polymarket acquired QCEX, a CFTC-licensed exchange and clearing entity, which gave the company a compliant foundation to reenter the United States. This acquisition changed the regulatory landscape. With QCEX under its umbrella, Polymarket could finally connect to the U.S. derivatives system in a way that aligned with federal rules.

The CFTC then issued a targeted no-action letter providing relief for certain recordkeeping and reporting requirements related specifically to event contracts. This signaled that regulators were open to a structured, compliant form of prediction markets.

The latest approval goes further. It integrates Polymarket’s U.S. entity into the full Designated Contract Market framework, meaning it can now operate in tandem with brokers, clearing firms and professional market infrastructure.

Polymarket has not simply returned. It has transformed.

 

What the New CFTC Approval Allows

With this newly amended approval, Polymarket’s U.S. exchange gains access to traditional financial infrastructure, including:

Intermediated Access

Brokers, futures commission merchants and financial intermediaries can now connect to the exchange. Retail participants will eventually be able to access markets through their existing brokerage accounts.

Regulated Clearing and Custody

Contracts can settle through a compliant clearinghouse with full risk controls, reporting frameworks and established audit systems. This allows Polymarket to operate with the same safeguards that apply to regulated futures markets.

Clear Legal Status

The exchange now sits inside the CFTC’s regulatory perimeter. Instead of operating in a legal gray zone, Polymarket’s U.S. operations function as a recognized derivatives venue.

This level of integration was once unimaginable for prediction markets. Now it represents the new baseline.

---

What Polymarket Plans to Bring to U.S. Users

Polymarket’s core innovation is event-based trading. Users buy or sell positions tied to real-world outcomes such as elections, policy decisions, sports results, economic data releases or cultural events.

The company plans a phased rollout for the U.S. market that will begin with a limited number of markets while onboarding infrastructure is tested. Over time the platform intends to expand into broader categories, including political outcomes, macroeconomic indicators and entertainment markets.

The company has raised substantial capital at valuations nearing one billion dollars, and investors expect the regulated U.S. platform to be a major growth driver.

 

Why This Moment Matters for Prediction Markets

Polymarket’s approval arrives at a time when interest in event contracts is growing across the financial, regulatory and technology sectors. Several major industry trends make this moment especially significant:

A Shift Away From Viewing Markets as Gambling

For decades regulators struggled to categorize prediction markets. The new CFTC framework acknowledges that event-based products can carry informational and hedging value rather than being dismissed as speculative wagers.

Expansion of Prediction Markets Across Industries

Traditional finance platforms, sports betting operators and fintech companies are exploring event-based products. This includes sports markets, political prediction markets and financial data markets.

Integration Into Mainstream Platforms

With intermediated access permitted, it is possible that Polymarket’s markets will eventually appear on traditional brokerage platforms, in the same accounts where users already trade stocks and futures.

Rising Legal Clarity

The regulatory structure around event contracts is still evolving, but Polymarket’s approval provides a template for others to follow. Until recently, no one could point to a clear path. Now there is one.

This is not just a step forward for Polymarket. It is a turning point for the entire prediction market industry.

 

Remaining Risks and Open Questions

While the approval is a major milestone, several challenges remain:

• State-level restrictions may still apply. Some states treat event markets as gambling, regardless of federal classification.

• Political concerns are rising as political event markets attract both attention and controversy.

• Scope of no-action relief remains limited, meaning regulators could still intervene if markets move outside approved parameters.

• Global regulatory landscape remains inconsistent, with foreign jurisdictions applying very different gambling and derivatives rules.

Polymarket’s success in the United States does not automatically eliminate international hurdles.

 

Final Thoughts

Polymarket’s return to the United States in fully regulated form marks one of the most important shifts in the history of prediction markets. A platform once forced offshore has now reentered the U.S. through a regulated, institutional-grade exchange framework. The significance of this moment goes far beyond one company. It signals that prediction markets may finally be entering the financial mainstream.

 

The next phase will determine how widely these markets spread, how they integrate with traditional finance and how regulators balance innovation with oversight. But for now, a once-fringe industry has gained legitimacy, and Polymarket stands at the center of the transformation.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.