Wells Fargo has filed a trademark application for "WFUSD" with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, covering a broad slate of cryptocurrency services.

 

The 'USD" within the filling leads to huge speculation about stablecoins as it follows the same naming convention used by Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC, the two more notable stablecoins account for the vast majority of the roughly $200 billion stablecoin market. Whether Wells Fargo is building toward a consumer-facing stablecoin product, an institutional settlement layer, or something else entirely, is not clear, and all just speculation.

 

The trademark was filed just months after President Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law in July 2025, the first comprehensive federal framework for payment stablecoins in U.S. history. The law opened a clear path for bank subsidiaries to issue dollar-pegged digital tokens under regulatory oversight, and Wells Fargo's trademark application reads like a bank that intends to walk through that door.

 

 

A Long History, A New Gear
Wells Fargo is not a newcomer to blockchain experimentation. Back in 2019, the bank unveiled Wells Fargo Digital Cash, a dollar-linked stablecoin built on R3's Corda blockchain designed to handle internal book transfers and cross-border settlements within its global network. The pilot worked. The bank successfully ran test transactions between its U.S. and Canadian accounts. But it stayed internal, never touching retail customers or external counterparties.

 

That earlier project had a narrow scope to try to reduce friction in the bank's own back-office transfers. The WFUSD trademark filing feels different. The scope covers cryptocurrency exchange services, digital asset transfers, payment processing, tokenization, blockchain transaction verification, and digital wallet services. That is not a description of an internal settlement tool. It is a description of a full-spectrum digital asset platform.

 

Wells Fargo's own research analysts had been tracking the stablecoin market closely well before the trademark filing surfaced. In a note published in May 2025, analysts led by Andrew Bauch wrote that stablecoin momentum had reached what they called "must-monitor levels," pointing to a 16% jump in total stablecoin market capitalization that year and a 43% rise over the prior twelve months. The report flagged payments companies including Mastercard, Visa, and PayPal as stocks with the most strategic exposure to the stablecoin wave. Whether those analysts knew about internal trademark discussions is unclear, but the research and the filing tell a consistent story about where the bank's thinking may have landed.

Wells Fargo is not acting alone. In May 2025, the Wall Street Journal reported that JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo were in early discussions about building a jointly operated U.S. dollar stablecoin, with payment infrastructure providers including Zelle and The Clearing House also at the table. Sources familiar with the matter described the conversations as exploratory, but the ambition was clear: create a bank-backed digital dollar that would compete with the success of crypot-native products.

 

JPMorgan has the most developed track record in this space, having operated JPM Coin since 2019 as an internal settlement instrument for institutional clients. The bank has reportedly settled more than $200 billion in transactions through the system. 

 

The GENIUS Act, which passed the Senate with a bipartisan vote of 68 to 30 and the House 308 to 122 before Trump signed it on July 18, 2025, created the regulatory framework that banks had been waiting for. Under the law, bank subsidiaries can issue payment stablecoins under the supervision of their primary federal banking regulator.

 

Issuers must maintain one-to-one reserves in highly liquid assets like Treasury bills, submit to regular audits, and comply with anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act requirements. The law also gave stablecoin holders priority claims over other creditors in any insolvency proceeding, a significant consumer protection provision.

 

For a bank like Wells Fargo, that framework essentially legalizes and licenses what its trademark filing envisions. The FDIC has already approved a proposed rulemaking to implement the GENIUS Act's application procedures for supervised institutions seeking to issue stablecoins, moving the machinery toward full implementation by January 2027 as the law prescribes.

 

 

Competition or Collaboration with Crypto?

While the big four banks have been circling the stablecoin market, crypto-native firms have been circling the banking sector. Circle, the issuer of USDC, has been in discussions about obtaining a bank charter. Coinbase, BitGo, and Paxos are all reportedly pursuing various forms of banking licensure that would let them compete more directly with traditional institutions for deposits and payment volumes. And, most notably, Kraken just recentlly received a Federal Reserve master account, gaining direct access to the Federal Reserve's payment infrastructure.

 

That competitive dynamic is partly what has given the joint stablecoin exploration among the major banks its urgency. A dollar-denominated stablecoin backed by federally chartered banks would carry a different kind of institutional weight than products issued by crypto firms, regardless of how well those firms have managed their reserves. 

 

Still, the incumbents face real headwinds. The GENIUS Act, while giving banks a clear path to issue stablecoins, also permits nonbank firms like fintechs and crypto companies to issue them under OCC oversight. Grant Thornton's national blockchain and digital assets practice leader, Markus Veith, noted after the law passed that banks could face serious competition from nonbank entities that don't carry the same regulatory burden or capital requirements. Stablecoins from USDT and USDC already saw their combined market share dip from 89% to under 84% over the past year as newer entrants gained traction.

 

 

What WFUSD Could Become
The trademark itself, of course, is not a product. Banks and large corporations file trademarks for concepts that never reach the market all the time, and a filing covering cryptocurrency services does not obligate Wells Fargo to ship a stablecoin by any particular date. The application does, however, reserve the commercial rights to the WFUSD brand across a spectrum of digital asset services, which is a form of strategic positioning that serious companies do when they intend to eventually use what they are protecting.

 

If Wells Fargo does build out WFUSD into a live product, the most likely initial form would be an institutional-grade settlement and payment layer, mirroring what Wells Fargo Digital Cash did internally but opening it to corporate clients and potentially other financial institutions. Cross-border payments represent the most obvious near-term use case. The market for global cross-border transactions was roughly $44 trillion in 2023 according to McKinsey estimates cited by the bank's own research team, and stablecoins offer demonstrably faster settlement, lower funding costs, and programmability through smart contracts compared to the correspondent banking infrastructure that currently handles most of that volume.

 

A consumer-facing version would require more work and more time. Wells Fargo analysts themselves noted in their May research note that everyday consumer adoption of stablecoins is likely still a decade away. But the infrastructure being built now, the trademarks being registered, the regulatory licenses being sought, the interoperability frameworks being designed, will determine who is positioned to serve that market when it arrives.

 

 

What Comes Next?

For Wells Fargo specifically, WFUSD represents the most concrete public signal of the bank's digital asset intentions to date. 

 

Whether the bank ultimately issues WFUSD as a standalone product, folds it into a larger bank consortium stablecoin, or uses the trademark as a branding vehicle for a custody and trading platform remains to be seen. The competitive pressure from both crypto-native firms building toward bank charters and fellow Wall Street institutions building their own digital dollar products means the bank can't afford to stay in patent-pending limbo for too long.

 

The name was chosen carefully. When the fourth-largest bank in the United States puts its initials on a dollar-pegged ticker and files it with the federal government, it is placing a bet on where finance is going. The question now is how fast it gets there.

 

 

Washington's stablecoin standoff just got a whole lot more personal.

 

Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, publicly fired back at JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on Tuesday, calling his arguments about stablecoin yields misleading and, in Witt's own word, a "deceit."

 

The exchange marks one of the sharpest moments yet in a months-long tug-of-war between Wall Street and the White House over the future of digital asset regulation in America.

 

Dimon Draws a Line in the Sand

It started Monday, when Dimon went on CNBC and didn't mince words. His position was simple, if uncompromising: any platform holding customer balances and paying interest on them is functionally a bank, and should be regulated like one.

 

"If you do that, the public will pay. It will get bad," Dimon warned, arguing that a two-tiered system where crypto firms operate with fewer restrictions than banks is unsustainable.

 

Dimon suggested a narrow compromise: platforms could offer rewards tied to transactions. But he drew a clear line at interest-like payments on idle balances, saying, "If you're going to be holding balances and paying interest, that's a bank."

 

The list of obligations Dimon believes should apply is long, FDIC insurance, capital and liquidity requirements, anti-money laundering controls, transparency standards, community lending mandates, and board governance requirements. "If they want to be a bank, so be it," he said.

 

For Dimon, it's fundamentally about fairness. JPMorgan uses blockchain in its own operations, and the CEO was careful to frame his argument not as anti-crypto but as pro-competition on equal terms. "We're in favor of competition. But it's got to be fair and balanced," he said.

 

 

The White House Fires Back

Witt wasn't going to let that stand. In a post on X late Tuesday, he went directly at Dimon's framing, calling it deliberately misleading.

 

"The deceit here is that it is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that necessitates bank-like regulations, but rather the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance," Witt wrote. "The GENIUS Act explicitly forbids stablecoin issuers from doing the latter."

 

The argument gets at something technically important. What makes a bank risky, and therefore subject to heavy regulation, isn't that it pays interest. It's that banks take deposits and lend them back out, creating credit and the systemic risk that comes with it. If too many people want their money back at once, that's a bank run. Stablecoin issuers operating under the GENIUS Act must maintain reserves at a 1:1 ratio. There is no fractional reserve lending, no rehypothecation, no credit creation.

 

In Witt's view, stablecoin balances aren't deposits, and treating them as such misrepresents what's actually happening. He closed with a pointed equation: "Stablecoins ≠ Deposits."

 

President Donald Trump didn't stay quiet either. On Tuesday, he took to Truth Social with a message that made his position unmistakably clear.

 

"The U.S. needs to get Market Structure done, ASAP. Americans should earn more money on their money. The Banks are hitting record profits, and we are not going to allow them to undermine our powerful Crypto Agenda that will end up going to China, and other Countries if we don't get the Clarity Act taken care of," Trump wrote.

 

Senator Cynthia Lummis quickly reposted Trump's message, adding her own call to action: "America can't afford to wait. Congress must move quickly to pass the Clarity Act."

 

The same day Trump posted, a Coinbase delegation led by CEO Brian Armstrong visited the White House for talks. The timing was not subtle.

 

The Real Stakes: The CLARITY Act

To understand why this debate matters so much right now, you need to understand the legislation being held hostage by it.

 

The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, established the first federal framework for payment stablecoins. The CLARITY Act is its sequel: a broader market structure bill that would assign clear regulatory jurisdiction to the SEC and CFTC over the crypto industry, and is widely seen as the piece of legislation needed to unlock large-scale institutional participation in digital assets.

 

The bill cleared the House comfortably but has been mired in Senate gridlock since January, when the Senate Banking Committee indefinitely postponed a planned markup vote. The trigger was Coinbase withdrawing support over a proposed amendment that would have restricted stablecoin rewards for users.

 

That withdrawal, announced by CEO Brian Armstrong in a post on X the night before the scheduled committee vote, split the crypto industry. a16z crypto's Chris Dixon publicly disagreed, posting "Now is the time to move the Clarity Act forward." Kraken's co-CEO Arjun Sethi also pushed back, writing that "walking away now would not preserve the status quo in practice" and warning it "would lock in uncertainty and leave American companies operating under ambiguity while the rest of the world moves forward."

 

The stakes for Coinbase are concrete. Stablecoins contribute nearly 20% of Coinbase's revenue, roughly $355 million in the third quarter of 2025 alone, and most of USDC's growth is occurring on Coinbase's platform. Coinbase currently offers 3.5% yield on USDC, a figure most traditional bank accounts can't come close to matching.

 

 

Banks Are Scared, and They Have the Numbers to Show It

The banking lobby's concern isn't hypothetical. Banking trade groups, led by the Bank Policy Institute, have warned that unrestricted stablecoin yield could trigger deposit outflows of up to $6.6 trillion, citing U.S. Treasury Department analysis. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan put a similar figure forward, reportedly suggesting as much as $6 trillion in deposits, representing roughly 30-35% of all U.S. commercial bank deposits, could be at risk.

 

Stablecoins registered $33 trillion in transaction volume in 2025, up 72% year-over-year. Bernstein projects total stablecoin supply will reach approximately $420 billion by the end of 2026, with longer-run forecasts from Citi putting the market at up to $4 trillion by 2030. Those aren't niche numbers anymore. At that scale, deposit competition becomes a serious macroeconomic question.

 

The American Bankers Association and 52 state bankers' associations explicitly urged Congress to extend the GENIUS Act's yield prohibitions to partners and affiliates of stablecoin issuers, warning of deposit disintermediation.

 

The Bottom Line

What's playing out right now is a genuine philosophical disagreement about what money is and how it should be regulated, wrapped inside a very consequential legislative fight, a prize fight with Banks in one corner and Crypto in the other.

 

Dimon's argument is not frivolous. Banks are regulated as heavily as they are because of what they do with deposited money, and a world where consumers move trillions into yield-bearing crypto instruments held at lightly regulated platforms carries real risks. The history of financial crises is largely a history of regulatory arbitrage gone wrong.

 

But Witt's counter is also not frivolous. The GENIUS Act was designed specifically to prevent stablecoin issuers from doing the things that make banks dangerous. A fully reserved, non-lending stablecoin issuer is structurally different from a fractional reserve bank, and applying the same regulatory framework to both risks conflating two fundamentally different business models.

 

What's harder to square is that the banking lobby's intervention in the CLARITY Act seems, to many in the crypto world, less about prudential regulation and more about protecting market share. President Trump has not been subtle about that read, accusing banks of holding the CLARITY Act hostage to protect incumbent interests against crypto competition.

 

With the legislative window narrowing, Armstrong back at the White House, and Trump openly calling out the banking lobby by name, this standoff has reached the kind of inflection point where someone is going to have to blink. The question is whether either side is willing to do it before time runs out entirely.

 

 

JPMorgan Takes Money Markets Onchain With Ethereum Launch

 

JPMorgan Chase is stepping deeper into blockchain finance, this time with a product that looks very familiar to Wall Street.

The bank has launched a tokenized money-market fund on Ethereum, marking one of the clearest signs yet that large financial institutions are moving beyond experiments and into real onchain products designed for investors.

The fund, called My OnChain Net Yield, or MONY, is a private money-market vehicle issued by JPMorgan Asset Management. It is seeded with $100 million of the bank’s own capital and is aimed squarely at institutional clients and high-net-worth investors, not crypto traders chasing volatility.

In simple terms, it is a traditional money-market fund, but the ownership lives on a blockchain.

 

A Familiar Product, Delivered Differently

Money-market funds are among the most conservative products in finance. They invest in short-term, high-quality debt and are used by institutions to park cash, manage liquidity, and earn modest yield.

JPMorgan is not changing that formula. What it is changing is how the fund is issued, held, and transferred.

Instead of relying solely on traditional fund administration systems, MONY issues digital tokens on Ethereum that represent ownership in the fund. Investors can subscribe using cash or stablecoins and receive tokenized shares that can be held in compatible digital wallets.

The pitch is efficiency. Blockchain settlement can be faster, more transparent, and easier to integrate with other digital financial tools. For large investors managing billions in cash, shaving time and operational friction matters.

 

Why Ethereum, Why Now

Ethereum has become the default blockchain for large financial institutions experimenting with tokenization. It offers a mature ecosystem, deep liquidity, and a growing set of standards for issuing real-world assets onchain.

Timing also plays a role. Tokenized funds have gained momentum over the past year as interest rates remain elevated and investors search for safe yield options that can operate alongside digital assets.

Stablecoins now move enormous sums across blockchains, but they typically do not pay interest. Tokenized money-market funds fill that gap, allowing capital to stay onchain while earning yield backed by regulated assets. That combination is proving difficult for institutions to ignore.

JPMorgan has framed the move as a response to client demand rather than a bet on crypto prices. The goal is infrastructure, not speculation.

 

Growing Appetite for Tokenization and Real-World Assets

Behind JPMorgan’s move is a surge in client interest that has been building quietly.

“There is a massive amount of interest from clients around tokenization,” said John Donohue, who leads liquidity at JPMorgan Asset Management. The firm expects to be a leader in the space and to give investors the same range of choices on blockchain that they already have in traditional money-market funds.

That demand is arriving as the regulatory picture in the U.S. begins to look more settled. Policymakers have taken steps this year to clarify how digital asset activity fits within the existing financial system. New rules around dollar-backed stablecoins and clearer signals on oversight of blockchain-based products have reduced some of the uncertainty that previously kept large institutions cautious.

Those changes have encouraged banks and asset managers to move faster on tokenization initiatives across funds, securities, and other real-world assets.

The market reflects that shift. The total value of tokenized real-world assets reached roughly $38 billion in 2025, a record level. Tokenized money-market funds have been particularly attractive to crypto-native investors, offering a way to earn yield without leaving the blockchain or converting assets back into traditional cash accounts.

 

 

A Crowded Field Is Taking Shape

JPMorgan’s launch places it alongside a growing group of large financial firms experimenting with tokenized funds.

BlackRock operates the largest tokenized money-market fund, with assets already measured in the billions. Goldman Sachs and Bank of New York Mellon have also outlined plans to issue digital tokens tied to money-market products from major asset managers. At the same time, crypto exchanges have begun rolling out tokenized stocks and other securities in select markets.

What was once a collection of pilot programs is turning into a competitive landscape.

 

The Quiet Bet Behind the Headlines

There is a longer-term bet embedded in JPMorgan’s move. If financial assets increasingly live onchain, money-market funds could become core building blocks of a new financial stack.

Tokenized cash can be used as collateral, settle instantly, and plug into automated systems that move value without waiting for bank cut-off times or settlement windows.

That future is still taking shape, and it will not arrive overnight. But moves like this bring it closer, one conservative product at a time.

For JPMorgan, MONY is not a moonshot. It is something more deliberate. Take a product Wall Street already trusts, put it on new rails, and see where efficiency leads.

 

That approach may end up being the most convincing case yet for blockchain finance inside traditional markets.

 

Stay Connected

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America’s Premier Blockchain Conference, happening  July 28th-31st, 2026 at The ARIA Resort & Casino, by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

JPMorgan Embraces Crypto Collateral: A Major Shift in Banking

JPMorgan Chase is preparing to allow institutional clients to use Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings as collateral for loans. This move, expected by year-end, marks a decisive pivot from the bank’s earlier skeptical stance toward cryptocurrencies.
Reports from Bloomberg, CoinDesk and others indicate the program will rely on third-party custody for the pledged assets and extends JPMorgan’s earlier acceptance of crypto-linked ETFs as collateral.

---

Why This Matters

From Skeptic to Adopter

CEO Jamie Dimon long dismissed Bitcoin—calling it “worthless” or a “pet rock”—yet this policy change suggests a hard turn by JPMorgan toward crypto integration.
This is not about hype. It’s about a bank with over $4 trillion in assets formally recognising crypto as part of its credit infrastructure.

Crypto Moves Into the Core System

Traditionally, banks only accepted highly liquid, low-volatility assets as loan collateral. Bitcoin and Ethereum are neither of those. So JPMorgan’s interest signals crypto is being treated more like mainstream assets—albeit with special guardrails.
Financial institutions now appear ready to unlock liquidity for clients who hold crypto without forcing them to sell. This could reshape how crypto assets are used in major portfolios and by large institutions.

Implications for Institutions and Investors

• Liquidity without selling: Crypto holders can pledge assets as collateral instead of selling, preserving upside while accessing cash.

• Broader adoption: Large banks entering the space bring legitimacy and infrastructure—moving crypto further toward the mainstream.

• Competitive pressure: If JPMorgan rolls this out, other banks will likely follow, accelerating institutional crypto services.

• Regulatory interplay: The move aligns with a more friendly regulatory tone in Washington and signals that banks believe the legal risks are manageable.

---

Key Details of the Proposal

• Institutionally focused: The offering is targeted at institutional clients, not retail.

• Third-Party Custody Model: Crypto pledged will be held by an approved external custodian, so the bank avoids direct asset custody.

• Global Scope: The program is expected to launch “by end of year” across relevant jurisdictions, though final details remain subject to change.

• Extension from ETFs: Earlier this year, JPMorgan accepted crypto-linked ETFs as loan collateral. This step advances directly to underlying crypto assets.

---

What to Watch Moving Forward

1. Launch Date and Terms: When exactly will the program go live and on what terms (loan-to-value ratios, margin calls, etc.)?

2. Asset Coverage: Will it start with Bitcoin and Ethereum only, or eventually include other major tokens?

3. Risk Framework: How will JPMorgan manage volatility, liquidation risk, custody failure and regulatory oversight?

4. Market Reaction: Will this spur greater institutional crypto investment and service offerings from banks, or will it prompt caution due to the novelty of crypto as collateral?

5. Competitive Impact: Which banks follow JPMorgan’s lead and how fast will the industry evolve?

---

Final Thoughts

 

JPMorgan’s plan to allow Bitcoin and Ethereum as loan collateral is a landmark for the crypto-banking crossover. It reflects growing confidence in digital assets, regulatory progress and the adoption of the crypto industry.
For crypto investors, this is a strong signal: the era of fringe use-cases is fading, and crypto is increasingly being integrated into core financial services. For the banking sector, it marks the beginning of a new chapter where digital assets may become standard tools in credit and liquidity management.
The details still matter—but the direction is clear. Crypto is stepping firmly into the mainstream.

---

 

You can stay up to date on all News, Events, and Marketing of Rare Network, including Rare Evo: America's Premier Blockchain Conference by following our socials on X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.